Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gel™ and Blockbuster™ laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized pediatric patients

被引:3
|
作者
Selvin, Caren Candace [1 ]
Singariya, Geeta [1 ]
Bihani, Pooja [1 ]
Kamal, Manoj [2 ]
Paliwal, Naveen [1 ]
Ujwal, Shobha [1 ]
机构
[1] Dr SN Med Coll Jodhpur, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Jodhpur, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci Jodhpur, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, 123 Vaishali Ave,Jhanwar Rd, Jodhpur 342008, Rajasthan, India
来源
ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
Blockbuster LMA; I-gel; Pediatric anesthesia; Supraglottic airways; I-GEL; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; CHILDREN; PERFORMANCE; DEVICES;
D O I
10.17085/apm.22209
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Supraglottic airways (SGA) are increasingly used in pediatric anesthesia. Among SGA, I-gel (TM) is a commonly used device in pediatric patients. The Blockbuster (TM) laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is latest addition in pediatric airway armamentarium. This study was conducted to compare the clinical performance of I-gel (TM) and Blockbuster (TM) LMA in pediatric patients. Methods: A total of 140 children aged 1-5 years, who were undergoing elective surgery, were randomized into two groups either I-gel (TM) (Group I) or Blockbuster (TM) LMA (Group B). Air-way was secured with appropriate-sized LMA according to group allocation under general anesthesia. The primary objective of study was oropharyngeal leak pressures (OPLP), and secondary objectives were number of attempts of device insertion, success rate, ease of LMA insertion, hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative pharyngolaryngeal morbidities. Results: The mean OPLP was significantly higher for I-gel (TM) compared to Blockbuster (TM) LMA (27.97 +/- 1.65 vs. 26.04 +/- 2.12; P < 0.001). The devices were successfully inserted on the first attempt in 97.14% and 90% of the Group I and Group B respectively. The insertion time, ease of insertion, hemodynamic parameters and postoperative complications were compa-rable between groups. Conclusions: The I-gel (TM) was more efficacious device in term of OPLP than Blockbuster (TM) LMA for positive pressure ventilation in pediatric patients undergoing short surgical proce-dures under general anesthesia.
引用
收藏
页数:121
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A randomized controlled study to compare oropharyngeal leak pressure between I-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in children in lateral position under general anesthesia
    Raksha Kundal
    Kriti Puri
    Garima Agrawal
    Ranju Singh
    Maitree Pandey
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 15
  • [22] Randomized crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask airway classic with i-gel laryngeal mask airway in the management of difficult airway in post burn neck contracture patients
    Singh, Jeevan
    Yadav, Manohar Kumar
    Marahatta, Sujan Babu
    Shrestha, Bikash Lal
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 56 (04) : 348 - 352
  • [23] Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme and the i-gel in paralysed elderly patients A randomised controlled trial
    Kim, Myoung H.
    Lee, Jae H.
    Choi, Yong S.
    Park, Sujung
    Shin, Seokyung
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 35 (08) : 598 - 604
  • [24] Comparison of Frequency of Complications of i-Gel and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Ali, Kashif
    Kumar, Ravi
    Ali, Abid
    Ali, Pervaiz
    Alam, M. Aneeque
    Kumar, Kelash
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (12): : 3180 - 3182
  • [25] Crossover Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Supreme™ and the i-gel™ in Simulated Difficult Airway Scenario in Anesthetized Patients
    Theiler, Lorenz G.
    Kleine-Brueggeney, Maren
    Kaiser, Dagmar
    Urwyler, Natalie
    Luyet, Cedric
    Vogt, Andreas
    Greif, Robert
    Unibe, M. M. E.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 111 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [26] Lubrication of the i-gel supraglottic airway and the classic laryngeal mask airway reply
    Wilkes, A. R.
    Janakiraman, C.
    Goodwin, N.
    Stacey, M. R.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 65 (01) : 89 - 89
  • [27] A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable Classic™ Laryngeal Mask Airway and the single-use Soft Seal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway
    Hanning, SJ
    McCulloch, TJ
    Orr, B
    Anderson, SP
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2006, 34 (02) : 237 - 239
  • [28] Comparison of laryngeal tube with laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized and paralysed patients
    Yildiz, T. S.
    Solak, M.
    Toker, K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 24 (07) : 620 - 625
  • [29] Airway management in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized children:: comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway™ with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway
    Mamaya, B
    PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 12 (05): : 411 - 415
  • [30] Intraocular pressure and haemodynamic responses to insertion of the i-gel, laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube
    Ismail, Salah A.
    Bisher, Neama A.
    Kandil, Hazem W.
    Mowafi, Hany A.
    Atawia, Hayam A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 28 (06) : 443 - 448