Comparison of EMR versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett's neoplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Fujiyoshi, Yusuke [1 ,2 ]
Khalaf, Kareem [1 ]
He, Tony [1 ,3 ]
Tham, Daniel [1 ]
Yuan, Yuhong [4 ,5 ]
Calo, Natalia C. [1 ]
Grover, Samir C. [1 ]
Teshima, Christopher W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Melbourne, Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, London, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
HIGH-GRADE DYSPLASIA; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.012
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are both accepted resection strategies for Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, a lack of consensus exists regarding which technique offers superior outcomes. This study aims to systematically review the evidence comparing EMR versus ESD in treating Barrett's neoplasia and EAC. Methods: We searched 3 databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central) through October 2023. We included studies comparing the efficacy of EMR and ESD for Barrett's neoplasia and EAC. Primary outcomes include en bloc, R0, and curative resection; complete remission of dysplasia (CRD), and local recurrence. Secondary outcomes encompass adverse events. Results: Our search identified 905 records. Eleven studies were included in the final analyses. Data showed significantly higher en bloc resection rates with ESD (odds ratio [OR], 31.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.02-99.19; P < .01; 7 studies). R0 resection rates were significantly higher with ESD (OR, 5.92; 95% CI, 2.75-12.77; P < .01; 8 studies). Curative resection rates tended to be higher with ESD (OR, 3.49; 95% CI, 0.86-14.14; P = .080; 4 studies). There was no significant difference in CRD rates (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.37-2.26; P = .86; 3 studies). Local recurrence rates tended to be lower with ESD (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.11-1.04; P = .058; 10 studies). As for adverse events, there was no significant difference in bleeding, perforation, and postoperative stricture rates. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that ESD achieves higher en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates, with a tendency toward lower recurrence rates. These results suggest that ESD may be a more effective option for managing Barrett's neoplasia and EAC. (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO] registration number: CRD42023426486.)
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Fenghao
    Yuan, Ping
    Chen, Tianxiang
    Hu, Jian
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 9
  • [32] Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early Barrett's neoplasia
    Barret, Maximilien
    Cao, Dalhia Thao
    Beuvon, Frederic
    Leblanc, Sarah
    Terris, Benoit
    Camus, Marine
    Coriat, Romain
    Chaussade, Stanislas
    Prat, Frederic
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 4 (02) : 207 - 215
  • [33] ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OF ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION LESIONS - A POOLED ANALYSIS AND COMPARATIVE META-ANALYSIS OF BARRETT'S ADENOCARCINOMA AND GASTRIC ADENOCARCINOMA
    Ali, Faisal S.
    Soin, Sarthak
    Hussain, Maryam R.
    Nehme, Fredy
    Lee, Jeffrey
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB461 - AB461
  • [34] Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection compared with conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lu, Jia-Xi
    Liu, De-Liang
    Tan, Yu-Yong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 10 (05) : 935 - 943
  • [35] The Impact of Traction Methods on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Efficacy for Gastric Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Niu, Chengu
    Zhang, Jing
    Vallabhajosyula, Saarwaani
    E-Xin, Bryan
    Napel, Mahesh
    Okolo, Patrick I.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2024, 55 (01) : 129 - 142
  • [36] The Impact of Traction Methods on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Efficacy for Gastric Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chengu Niu
    Jing Zhang
    Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula
    Bryan E-Xin
    Mahesh Napel
    Patrick I. Okolo
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer, 2024, 55 : 129 - 142
  • [37] ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD) VERSUS TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY (TAES) FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF RECTAL ADENOMA AND ADENOCARCINOMA - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Saleem, Nasir
    Ali, Faisal S.
    Soin, Sarthak
    Hussain, Maryam R.
    Moore, Joseph A.
    Ismail, Mohammad K.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (06) : AB426 - AB427
  • [38] Comparison of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Eggleston, Connor J.
    Claassen, Pierce L.
    Rangray, Rajani
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (10): : S833 - S834
  • [39] Endoscopic Resection of Esophageal Neoplasia: Comparison of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) With Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) in Our Institution
    Kambayashi, Harutaka
    Nishimura, Makoto
    Matsukawa, Miho
    Ushio, Yasuko
    Sasaki, Mina
    Uegaki, Satoko
    Nakajima, Kenichirou
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB576 - AB576
  • [40] Endoscopic resection of esophageal neoplasia: comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in our institution
    Omura, Takuya
    Nishimura, Makoto
    Kanbayashi, Harutaka
    Nakajima, Kenichirou
    Ushio, Yasuko
    Sasaki, Mina
    Uegaki, Satoko
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 298 - 298