Comparison of EMR versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett's neoplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Fujiyoshi, Yusuke [1 ,2 ]
Khalaf, Kareem [1 ]
He, Tony [1 ,3 ]
Tham, Daniel [1 ]
Yuan, Yuhong [4 ,5 ]
Calo, Natalia C. [1 ]
Grover, Samir C. [1 ]
Teshima, Christopher W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Melbourne, Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, London, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
HIGH-GRADE DYSPLASIA; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.012
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are both accepted resection strategies for Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, a lack of consensus exists regarding which technique offers superior outcomes. This study aims to systematically review the evidence comparing EMR versus ESD in treating Barrett's neoplasia and EAC. Methods: We searched 3 databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central) through October 2023. We included studies comparing the efficacy of EMR and ESD for Barrett's neoplasia and EAC. Primary outcomes include en bloc, R0, and curative resection; complete remission of dysplasia (CRD), and local recurrence. Secondary outcomes encompass adverse events. Results: Our search identified 905 records. Eleven studies were included in the final analyses. Data showed significantly higher en bloc resection rates with ESD (odds ratio [OR], 31.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.02-99.19; P < .01; 7 studies). R0 resection rates were significantly higher with ESD (OR, 5.92; 95% CI, 2.75-12.77; P < .01; 8 studies). Curative resection rates tended to be higher with ESD (OR, 3.49; 95% CI, 0.86-14.14; P = .080; 4 studies). There was no significant difference in CRD rates (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.37-2.26; P = .86; 3 studies). Local recurrence rates tended to be lower with ESD (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.11-1.04; P = .058; 10 studies). As for adverse events, there was no significant difference in bleeding, perforation, and postoperative stricture rates. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that ESD achieves higher en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates, with a tendency toward lower recurrence rates. These results suggest that ESD may be a more effective option for managing Barrett's neoplasia and EAC. (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO] registration number: CRD42023426486.)
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA IN BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS AFTER ENDOSCOPIC RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW & META-ANALYSIS
    Singh, Sahib
    Rahman, Arisha
    Faiz, Zohaa
    Vinayek, Rakesh
    Dutta, Sudhir
    Dahiya, Dushyant Singh
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Sharma, Neil
    Adler, Douglas
    Mohan, Babu
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (06) : AB946 - AB946
  • [22] Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Barrett's Esophagus After Endoscopic Ablative Therapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
    Wani, Sachin
    Puli, Srinivas R.
    Shaheen, Nicholas J.
    Westhoff, Brenda
    Slehria, Sanjeev
    Bansal, Ajay
    Rastogi, Amit
    Sayana, Hari
    Sharma, Prateek
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (02): : 502 - 513
  • [23] CLINICAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Fuccio, L.
    Hassan, C.
    Ponchon, T.
    Mandolesi, D.
    Farioli, A.
    Cucchetti, A.
    Frazzoni, L.
    Bhandari, P.
    Bellisario, C.
    Bazzoli, F.
    Repici, A.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2017, 49 : E211 - E211
  • [24] Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Hassan, Cesare
    Ponchon, Thierry
    Mandolesi, Daniele
    Farioli, Andrea
    Cucchetti, Alessandro
    Frazzoni, Leonardo
    Bhandari, Pradeep
    Bellisario, Cristina
    Bazzoli, Franco
    Repici, Alessandro
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 86 (01) : 74 - +
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Chunyao
    Sun, Yonghong
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2021, 34 (04)
  • [26] Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Akintoye, Emmanuel
    Kumar, Nitin
    Aihara, Hiroyuki
    Nas, Hala
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (10) : E1030 - E1044
  • [27] PREVALENCE OF BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS IN ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Tan, Mimi C.
    Mansour, Nabil
    White, Donna
    El-Serag, Hashem B.
    Thrift, Aaron P.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S894 - S894
  • [28] Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Squamous Esophageal Neoplasia: A Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Joon Sung
    Kim, Byung-Wook
    Shin, In-Soo
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2014, 59 (08) : 1862 - 1869
  • [29] Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Squamous Esophageal Neoplasia: A Meta-Analysis
    Joon Sung Kim
    Byung-Wook Kim
    In-Soo Shin
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2014, 59 : 1862 - 1869
  • [30] Efficacy and complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fenghao Sun
    Ping Yuan
    Tianxiang Chen
    Jian Hu
    Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 9