Comparison of EMR versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for Barrett's neoplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Fujiyoshi, Yusuke [1 ,2 ]
Khalaf, Kareem [1 ]
He, Tony [1 ,3 ]
Tham, Daniel [1 ]
Yuan, Yuhong [4 ,5 ]
Calo, Natalia C. [1 ]
Grover, Samir C. [1 ]
Teshima, Christopher W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Melbourne, Fac Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, London, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
HIGH-GRADE DYSPLASIA; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.012
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are both accepted resection strategies for Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, a lack of consensus exists regarding which technique offers superior outcomes. This study aims to systematically review the evidence comparing EMR versus ESD in treating Barrett's neoplasia and EAC. Methods: We searched 3 databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central) through October 2023. We included studies comparing the efficacy of EMR and ESD for Barrett's neoplasia and EAC. Primary outcomes include en bloc, R0, and curative resection; complete remission of dysplasia (CRD), and local recurrence. Secondary outcomes encompass adverse events. Results: Our search identified 905 records. Eleven studies were included in the final analyses. Data showed significantly higher en bloc resection rates with ESD (odds ratio [OR], 31.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.02-99.19; P < .01; 7 studies). R0 resection rates were significantly higher with ESD (OR, 5.92; 95% CI, 2.75-12.77; P < .01; 8 studies). Curative resection rates tended to be higher with ESD (OR, 3.49; 95% CI, 0.86-14.14; P = .080; 4 studies). There was no significant difference in CRD rates (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.37-2.26; P = .86; 3 studies). Local recurrence rates tended to be lower with ESD (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.11-1.04; P = .058; 10 studies). As for adverse events, there was no significant difference in bleeding, perforation, and postoperative stricture rates. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that ESD achieves higher en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates, with a tendency toward lower recurrence rates. These results suggest that ESD may be a more effective option for managing Barrett's neoplasia and EAC. (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO] registration number: CRD42023426486.)
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR BARRETT'S NEOPLASIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Fujiyoshi, Yusuke
    Khalaf, Kareem
    He, Tony
    Tham, Daniel
    Yuan, Yuhong
    Gimpaya, Nikko
    Calo, Natalia C.
    Grover, Samir
    Teshima, Christopher
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (06) : AB1014 - AB1014
  • [2] Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Management of Barrett's Early Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Dennis
    Zou, Fei
    Xiong, Sican
    Draganov, Peter V.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 85 (05) : AB409 - AB409
  • [3] ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION VERSUS ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION IN THE TREATMENT OF EARLY BARRETT'S NEOPLASIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Gallegos, Megui Mansilla
    Caetite Gomes, Igor Logetto
    De Moura, Diogo
    Nascimento, Hiram
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (06) : AB984 - AB985
  • [4] Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early Barrett's neoplasia: a meta-analysis
    Yang, Dennis
    Zou, Fei
    Xiong, Sican
    Forde, Justin J.
    Wang, Yu
    Draganov, Peter V.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : 1383 - 1393
  • [5] Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vs Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in Early Barrett's Neoplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Saeed, Aamir
    Yousuf, Saira
    Hayat, Muhammad
    Haider, Marjan
    Gangwani, Manesh Kumar
    Aziz, Muhammad
    Hayat, Umar
    Salcedo, Christian
    Farooq, Umer
    Saleem, Nasir
    Khan, Muhammad
    Kamal, Faisal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10S): : S400 - S401
  • [6] RECURRENCE FOLLOWING ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OF EARLY ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Shah, Sagar
    Muthusamy, V. Raman
    Sedarat, Alireza
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB1066 - AB1067
  • [7] Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for Barrett's-associated neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature
    Radadiya, Dhruvil
    Desai, Madhav
    Patel, Harsh
    Velji-Ibrahim, Jena
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Srinivasan, Sachin
    Khurana, Shruti
    Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva
    Perisetti, Abhilash
    Repici, Alessandro
    Hassan, Cesare
    Sharma, Prateek
    ENDOSCOPY, 2024,
  • [8] Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs. endoscopic mucosal resection in the treatment of early Barrett's neoplasia: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gallegos, Megui Marilia Mansilla
    Gomes, Igor Logetto Caetite
    Brunaldi, Vitor Ottoboni
    Bestetti, Alexandre Moraes
    Marques, Sergio Barbosa
    Miyajima, Nelson Tomio
    Filho, Hiram Menezes Nascimento
    da Silva, Pedro Henrique Veras Ayres
    Kum, Angelo So Taa
    Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
    de Moura, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2024,
  • [9] Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ting Zhang
    Hao Zhang
    Furui Zhong
    Xuan Wang
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 52 - 62
  • [10] Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Ting
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhong, Furui
    Wang, Xuan
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (01): : 52 - 62