Predictors of SLNB in Thin Melanoma: Understanding the Impact of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Staging System

被引:0
|
作者
Donica, Walter R. F. [1 ]
Stephens, Kyle R. [1 ]
Philips, Prejesh [1 ]
Mcmasters, Kelly M. [1 ]
Egger, Michael E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Hiram C Polk Jr MD Dept Surg, Louisville, KY USA
关键词
LYMPH-NODE POSITIVITY; MITOTIC RATE; SENTINEL; BIOPSY; METASTASIS; AGE;
D O I
10.1097/XCS.0000000000001296
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND:The definition of T1b cutaneous melanoma was changed in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system based on survival differences but not risk of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases. We sought to evaluate changes in SLNB use and rates of positive SLNB in response to updated staging criteria, and to evaluate the incidence of high-risk features in T1a melanoma in whom SLNB is now recommended. STUDY DESIGN:The 2021 National Cancer Database Melanoma Participant User File was used to obtain SLNB use and positivity rates in T1 (thin) melanoma (thickness 1.0 mm or less) from 2012 to 2021. Rates were compared between AJCC 7th (2012 to 2017) and 8th editions (2018 to 2021). Factors associated with SLNB use in nonulcerated T1 melanoma were evaluated. The presence of high-risk features in T1a melanoma was identified and SLN positivity rates were reviewed. RESULTS:A total of 136,966 cases were included with 76,485 (55.8%) cases diagnosed under the AJCC 7th edition era (2021 to 2017). The overall proportion of patients with thin melanoma undergoing SLNB was relatively stable over the time periods, roughly 30%. In the AJCC 8th edition era, the overall SLNB positivity rate slightly increased from 4.5% to 6.6% (p < 0.001). There was increased SLNB use in melanoma with a thickness of 0.8 to 1.0 mm (T1b: odds ratio 2.53 [95% CI 2.31 to 2.78]) and decreased use when the thickness was less than 0.8 mm (T1a: odds ratio 0.80 [0.76 to 0.85]). The rate of SLNB positivity increased in both thickness groups over time. CONCLUSIONS:After implementation of the AJCC 8th edition staging criteria, surgeons have become more selective in SLNB use with a resulting increase in SLNB positivity rate. Fewer SLNBs in T1a and more SLNBs in nonulcerated T1b are being performed.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 527
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Letter to the Editor: "An Analysis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition T Staging System for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma"
    Asare, Elliot A.
    Perrier, Nancy D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2020, 105 (09): : E3488 - E3489
  • [42] Changes in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging of Head and Neck Cancer: Rationale and Implications
    Daniella Karassawa Zanoni
    Snehal G. Patel
    Jatin P. Shah
    Current Oncology Reports, 2019, 21
  • [43] The solved and unresolved issues of melanoma staging: A comparison of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th versus 8th edition.
    Bajaj, Shirin
    Collado, Anthony
    Moran, Una
    Donnelly, Douglas MacArthur
    Johannet, Paul
    Shapiro, Richard L.
    Berman, Russell S.
    Weber, Jeffrey S.
    Zhong, Judy
    Osman, Iman
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [44] Incorporation of Lymphovascular Invasion Improves American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Pathologic Staging for Gallbladder Cancer
    Dominguez, Dana A.
    Blakely, Andrew M.
    Melstrom, Laleh
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S166 - S166
  • [45] Validation of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging for young breast cancer patients
    Zhou, Juan
    Lei, Jian
    Wang, Jun
    Lian, Chen-Lu
    Hua, Li
    Yang, Li-Chao
    Wu, San-Gang
    AGING-US, 2020, 12 (08): : 7549 - 7560
  • [46] Changes in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging of Head and Neck Cancer: Rationale and Implications
    Zanoni, Daniella Karassawa
    Patel, Snehal G.
    Shah, Jatin P.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 21 (06)
  • [47] External validation of the 8th Edition Melanoma Staging System of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) using the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) program
    Tjokrowidjaja, A.
    Browne, L.
    Soudy, H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [48] Historical progress of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual in patients with breast cancer
    Kosaka, Yoshimasa
    Nishimiya, Hiroshi
    Kikuchi, Mariko
    Waraya, Mina
    Katoh, Hiroshi
    Sengoku, Norihiko
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (03) : 719 - 721
  • [49] Prognostic Implications of Altering the Nodal Staging for Anal Cancer in the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th (AJCC8) Edition Staging Manual
    Elson, J. K.
    Kachnic, L. A.
    Longo, J. M.
    Tao, R.
    Amarnath, S. R.
    Lloyd, S. A.
    Kharofa, J. R., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E4 - E4
  • [50] Assessment of the external validity of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system for anal carcinoma
    Oweira, Hani
    Giryes, Anwar
    Mannhart, Meinrad
    Decker, Michael
    Schlumpf, Rolf
    Abdel-Rahman, Omar
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2018, 34 (05) : 923 - 929