Predictors of SLNB in Thin Melanoma: Understanding the Impact of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Staging System

被引:0
|
作者
Donica, Walter R. F. [1 ]
Stephens, Kyle R. [1 ]
Philips, Prejesh [1 ]
Mcmasters, Kelly M. [1 ]
Egger, Michael E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Hiram C Polk Jr MD Dept Surg, Louisville, KY USA
关键词
LYMPH-NODE POSITIVITY; MITOTIC RATE; SENTINEL; BIOPSY; METASTASIS; AGE;
D O I
10.1097/XCS.0000000000001296
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND:The definition of T1b cutaneous melanoma was changed in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system based on survival differences but not risk of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases. We sought to evaluate changes in SLNB use and rates of positive SLNB in response to updated staging criteria, and to evaluate the incidence of high-risk features in T1a melanoma in whom SLNB is now recommended. STUDY DESIGN:The 2021 National Cancer Database Melanoma Participant User File was used to obtain SLNB use and positivity rates in T1 (thin) melanoma (thickness 1.0 mm or less) from 2012 to 2021. Rates were compared between AJCC 7th (2012 to 2017) and 8th editions (2018 to 2021). Factors associated with SLNB use in nonulcerated T1 melanoma were evaluated. The presence of high-risk features in T1a melanoma was identified and SLN positivity rates were reviewed. RESULTS:A total of 136,966 cases were included with 76,485 (55.8%) cases diagnosed under the AJCC 7th edition era (2021 to 2017). The overall proportion of patients with thin melanoma undergoing SLNB was relatively stable over the time periods, roughly 30%. In the AJCC 8th edition era, the overall SLNB positivity rate slightly increased from 4.5% to 6.6% (p < 0.001). There was increased SLNB use in melanoma with a thickness of 0.8 to 1.0 mm (T1b: odds ratio 2.53 [95% CI 2.31 to 2.78]) and decreased use when the thickness was less than 0.8 mm (T1a: odds ratio 0.80 [0.76 to 0.85]). The rate of SLNB positivity increased in both thickness groups over time. CONCLUSIONS:After implementation of the AJCC 8th edition staging criteria, surgeons have become more selective in SLNB use with a resulting increase in SLNB positivity rate. Fewer SLNBs in T1a and more SLNBs in nonulcerated T1b are being performed.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 527
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Benefits of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer System for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging
    Satala, Catalin Bogdan
    Jung, Ioan
    Kobori, Laszlo
    Kovacs, Zsolt
    Fodor, Decebal
    Szodorai, Rita
    Gurzu, Simona
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2021, 52 (01) : 243 - 248
  • [22] Need to restage Korean melanoma patients following publication of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual
    Lee, Hyun Ji
    Park, Kyung Duck
    Jang, Yong Hyun
    Lee, Weon Ju
    Lee, Seok-Jong
    Kim, Jun Young
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2022, 88 (03): : 332 - 336
  • [23] The American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is it better than the 7th edition?
    Shin, Dong Woo
    Kim, Jaihwan
    HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2020, 9 (01) : 98 - 100
  • [24] Stage migration with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (8th edition) for differentiated thyroid cancer
    Shaha, Ashok R.
    Migliacci, Jocelyn C.
    Nixon, Lain J.
    Wang, Laura Y.
    Wong, Richard J.
    Morris, Luc G. T.
    Patel, Snehal G.
    Shah, Jatin P.
    Tuttle, R. Michael
    Ganly, Ian
    SURGERY, 2019, 165 (01) : 6 - 11
  • [25] Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for gastric cancer patients after preoperative therapy
    Ikoma, Naruhiko
    Blum, Mariela
    Estrella, Jeannelyn S.
    Das, Prajnan
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Fournier, Keith F.
    Mansfield, Paul
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    Badgwell, Brian D.
    GASTRIC CANCER, 2018, 21 (01) : 74 - 83
  • [26] Stage Ⅲ should be subclassified into Stage ⅢA and ⅢB in the American Joint Committee on Cancer(8th Edition) staging system for pancreatic cancer
    Hai-Feng Yu
    Bing-Qing Zhao
    Yong-Cheng Li
    Jun Fu
    Wei Jiang
    Rong-Wei Xu
    Hao-Chang Yang
    Xiao-Jun Zhang
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2018, 24 (22) : 2400 - 2405
  • [27] A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer
    Lee, Sae Byul
    Sohn, Guiyun
    Kim, Jisun
    Chung, Il Yong
    Lee, Jong Won
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    Ko, Beom Seok
    Son, Byung Ho
    Ahn, Sei-Hyun
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 169 (02) : 257 - 266
  • [28] A retrospective prognostic evaluation analysis using the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer
    Sae Byul Lee
    Guiyun Sohn
    Jisun Kim
    Il Yong Chung
    Jong Won Lee
    Hee Jeong Kim
    Beom Seok Ko
    Byung Ho Son
    Sei-Hyun Ahn
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 169 : 257 - 266
  • [29] Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual 8th Edition for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
    Marcia P. Gaspersz
    Stefan Buettner
    Jeroen L. A. van Vugt
    Jeroen de Jonge
    Wojciech G. Polak
    Michail Doukas
    Jan N. M. Ijzermans
    Bas Groot Koerkamp
    François E. J. A. Willemssen
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2020, 24 : 1612 - 1618
  • [30] Evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system for gastric cancer patients after preoperative therapy
    Naruhiko Ikoma
    Mariela Blum
    Jeannelyn S. Estrella
    Prajnan Das
    Wayne L. Hofstetter
    Keith F. Fournier
    Paul Mansfield
    Jaffer A. Ajani
    Brian D. Badgwell
    Gastric Cancer, 2018, 21 : 74 - 83