US-China agricultural trade and environmental outcomes: The case of nutrient runoff to the Gulf of Mexico

被引：0

作者：

Xu, Yuelu ^{[1
]}

Elbakidze, Levan ^{[2
]}

Gassman, Philip W. ^{[3
]}

Yen, Haw ^{[4
,5
]}

Ma, Yongxi ^{[6
]}

Hubbart, Jason A. ^{[7
]}

Arnold, Jeffery G. ^{[8
]}

机构：

[1] Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res, Auckland, New Zealand

[2] West Virginia Univ, Div Resource Econ & Management, Davis Coll Agr Nat Resources & Design, Agr Sci Bldg, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA

[3] Iowa State Univ, Ctr Agr & Rural Dev, Ames, IA USA

[4] Bayer US, Crop Sci, Chesterfield, MO USA

[5] Auburn Univ, Sch Forestry & Wildlife Sci, Auburn, AL USA

[6] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hangzhou, Peoples R China

[7] West Virginia Univ, Davis Coll Agr Nat Resources & Design, Morgantown, WV USA

[8] USDA ARS, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, Temple, TX USA

来源：

APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY | 2025年

基金：

美国国家科学基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Agricultural production; Economic optimization; Nitrogen runoff; Trade friction; SPATIAL EQUILIBRIUM; PRICE ELASTICITIES; WATER; FOOD; COMMODITIES; BIOFUELS; INDUSTRY; POLICIES; IMPACTS; MODELS;

D O I：

10.1002/aepp.13501

中图分类号：

F3 [农业经济];

学科分类号：

0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;

摘要：

We quantify the relationship between nitrogen (N) runoff to the Gulf of Mexico, U.S. agricultural production, and exports to China using an integrated assessment model. We show that a 25% Chinese tariff on U.S. soybean and corn increases annual N runoff to the Gulf by 800 metric tons (0.2%) as soybean production in the Mississippi River Basin is displaced with more N-intensive crops. Results also indicate that reducing N runoff to the Gulf by 10% decreases U.S. corn export to China by 14.5%, similar to the effect of a 25% Chinese tariff on corn and soybeans.

引用

页数：20

共 50 条

[1] US-China trade friction and agricultural nitrogen loss in China
Wang, Juanli
Yu, Shuao
Elbakidze, Levan
Xin, Yaru
Song, Shixiong
Ma, Yongxi
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2024, 106
[2] US-China Trade War: Causes and Outcomes
Kapustina, Larisa
Lipkova, Ludmila
Silin, Yakov
Drevalev, Andrei
INNOVATIVE ECONOMIC SYMPOSIUM 2019 - POTENTIAL OF EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION (IES2019), 2020, 73
[3] The Case for Healthy US-China Agricultural Trade Relations despite Deglobalization PressuresJEL codes
Zhang, Wendong
APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2021, 43 (01) : 225 - 247
[4] US-China trade conflict and its implications for Australia's agricultural trade
Chai, JCH
POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SINO-AMERICAN RELATIONS: A GREATER CHINA PERSPECTIVE, 1997, : 223 - 242
[5] BLOSSOMING OF US-CHINA TRADE
不详
AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING, 1974, 55 (04): : 18 - 18
[6] Global and National Environmental Impacts of the US-China Trade War
Lu, Jianhong
Mao, Xianqiang
Wang, Mudan
Liu, Zhengyan
Song, Peng
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (24) : 16108 - 16118
[7] US-CHINA TRADE PROSPECTS
CHEN, CY
COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 1974, 9 (03): : 80 - 86
[8] THE EFFECTS OF US-CHINA TRADE ON EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES IN THE US-MEXICO BORDER REGION
Ma, Alyson C.
Wooster, Rossitza B.
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2009, 27 (03) : 335 - 348
[9] Impacts of the US-China Trade War on ASEAN: Case of Thailand
Nidhiprabha, Bhanupong
ASIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2019, 18 (03) : 166 - 188
[10] THE US-CHINA TRADE DISPUTE: A MACROPERSPECTIVE
Tyers, Rod
Zhou, Yixiao
SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021,

← 1 2 3 4 5 →