Does Bone Preservation at the Anterior Edge of the Vertebral Body Affect the Subsidence of Zero-Profile Cages After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Bin [1 ]
Kong, Qingquan [2 ]
Feng, Pin [1 ]
Liu, Junlin [1 ]
Ma, Junsong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Chengdu Off Peoples Govt Tibetan Autonomous R, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
POLYETHERETHERKETONE PEEK CAGES; RISK-FACTORS; EFFICACY; PLATE; DECOMPRESSION; METAANALYSIS; DYSPHAGIA; IMPLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.057
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the preservation of the anterior edge of the vertebral body affects the cage subsidence and clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using zero-profile cages. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 86 patients who underwent 1-3 levels of ACDF using zero-profile cages between December 2017 and June 2023. According to whether the anterior edge was protected, the patients were divided into an intact group and a defect group. Cage subsidence was defined as a double dagger 2 mm decrease in vertebral height at follow-up compared with measurement on postoperative day 2. The patients' radiological parameters and clinical outcomes were also analyzed. RESULTS: The subsidence rate was 17.02% (8/47) in the intact group and 41.03% (16/39) in the defect group (P = 0.014). At the last follow-up, all patients in both groups achieved complete intervertebral fusion. The cervical lordosis of the 2 groups was effectively restored after surgery, and the visual analog scale and Neck Disability Indexscores of the 2 groups were significantly improved. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the protective factor for zero-profile cage subsidence was bone protection at the anterior edge of the vertebral body (odds ratio = 0.270; 95% confidence interval = 0.0910.804), and the risk factor was related to the height of the preoperative surgical segment (odds ratio = 2.285; 95% confidence interval = 1.395-3.743). CONCLUSIONS: For patients who undergo ACDF with zero-profile cages, especially those with a higher surgical segment, bone protection at the anterior edge of the vertebral body can effectively reduce the risk of zero- profile cage subsidence, but there is no difference in the final clinical effect.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing zero-profile and conventional cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using finite-element modeling
    Chang-Hwan Ahn
    Sungwook Kang
    Mingoo Cho
    Seong-Hun Kim
    Chi Heon Kim
    Inbo Han
    Chul-Hyun Kim
    Sung Hyun Noh
    Kyoung-Tae Kim
    Jong-Moon Hwang
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [32] Cervical vertebral Hounsfield units are a better predictor of Zero-P subsidence than the T-score of DXA in patients following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile anchored spacer
    Hong-yu Pu
    Xun-zhou Song
    Bo Wang
    Peng Wei
    Rui Zeng
    Qian Chen
    European Spine Journal, 2024, 33 : 216 - 223
  • [33] Cervical vertebral Hounsfield units are a better predictor of Zero-P subsidence than the T-score of DXA in patients following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile anchored spacer
    Pu, Hong-yu
    Song, Xun-zhou
    Wang, Bo
    Wei, Peng
    Zeng, Rui
    Chen, Qian
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (01) : 216 - 223
  • [34] Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): Comparison Between Zero Profile Implants and Anterior Cervical Plate and Spacer
    Alimi, Marjan
    Njoku, Innocent
    Hofstetter, Christoph P.
    Tsiouris, Apostolos J.
    Kesavabhotla, Kartik
    Boockvar, John
    Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo
    Hartl, Roger
    CUREUS, 2016, 8 (04):
  • [35] A Randomized Trial Comparing Clinical Outcomes Between Zero-Profile and Traditional Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery for Cervical Myelopathy
    He, Shenghua
    Feng, Hualong
    Lan, Zhiming
    Lai, Juyi
    Sun, Zhitao
    Wang, Yeguang
    Wang, Jian
    Ren, Zhiqiang
    Huang, Feiqiang
    Xu, Fuguang
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (05) : E259 - E266
  • [36] A New Potential Complication in 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Devices: Collapse of the Middle Cervical Vertebra
    Lin, Hongheng
    Zhao, Wenhua
    Wang, Xiaowen
    Yan, Xianwei
    Zhu, Guangye
    Liang, De
    Ren, Hui
    Jiang, Xiaobing
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 165 : E175 - E190
  • [37] A New Potential Complication in 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Devices: Collapse of the Middle Cervical Vertebra
    Lin, Hongheng
    Zhao, Wenhua
    Wang, Xiaowen
    Yan, Xianwei
    Zhu, Guangye
    Liang, De
    Ren, Hui
    Jiang, Xiaobing
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 165 : E175 - E190
  • [38] Adjacent Segment Biomechanical Changes After Implantation of Cage Plus Plate or Zero-Profile Device in Different Segmental Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Ye, Peng
    Fu, Rongchang
    Wang, Zhaoyao
    Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2023,
  • [39] Can the Zero-Profile Implant Be Used for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Traumatic Subaxial Disc Injury? A Preliminary, Retrospective Study
    Kim, Tae Hun
    Kim, Dae Hyun
    Kim, Ki Hong
    Kwak, Young Seok
    Kwak, Sang Gyu
    Choi, Man Kyu
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 61 (05) : 574 - 581
  • [40] Changes in cervical alignment of Zero-profile device versus conventional cage-plate construct after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis
    Liu, Ziwen
    Yang, Yuming
    Lan, Jie
    Xu, Hanpeng
    Zhang, Zepei
    Miao, Jun
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2022, 17 (01)