Does Bone Preservation at the Anterior Edge of the Vertebral Body Affect the Subsidence of Zero-Profile Cages After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Bin [1 ]
Kong, Qingquan [2 ]
Feng, Pin [1 ]
Liu, Junlin [1 ]
Ma, Junsong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Chengdu Off Peoples Govt Tibetan Autonomous R, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
POLYETHERETHERKETONE PEEK CAGES; RISK-FACTORS; EFFICACY; PLATE; DECOMPRESSION; METAANALYSIS; DYSPHAGIA; IMPLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.057
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the preservation of the anterior edge of the vertebral body affects the cage subsidence and clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using zero-profile cages. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 86 patients who underwent 1-3 levels of ACDF using zero-profile cages between December 2017 and June 2023. According to whether the anterior edge was protected, the patients were divided into an intact group and a defect group. Cage subsidence was defined as a double dagger 2 mm decrease in vertebral height at follow-up compared with measurement on postoperative day 2. The patients' radiological parameters and clinical outcomes were also analyzed. RESULTS: The subsidence rate was 17.02% (8/47) in the intact group and 41.03% (16/39) in the defect group (P = 0.014). At the last follow-up, all patients in both groups achieved complete intervertebral fusion. The cervical lordosis of the 2 groups was effectively restored after surgery, and the visual analog scale and Neck Disability Indexscores of the 2 groups were significantly improved. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the protective factor for zero-profile cage subsidence was bone protection at the anterior edge of the vertebral body (odds ratio = 0.270; 95% confidence interval = 0.0910.804), and the risk factor was related to the height of the preoperative surgical segment (odds ratio = 2.285; 95% confidence interval = 1.395-3.743). CONCLUSIONS: For patients who undergo ACDF with zero-profile cages, especially those with a higher surgical segment, bone protection at the anterior edge of the vertebral body can effectively reduce the risk of zero- profile cage subsidence, but there is no difference in the final clinical effect.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Meta-Analysis Comparing Zero-Profile Spacer and Anterior Plate in Anterior Cervical Fusion
    Dong, Jun
    Lu, Meng
    Lu, Teng
    Liang, Baobao
    Xu, Junkui
    Zhou, Jun
    Lv, Hongjun
    Qin, Jie
    Cai, Xuan
    Huang, Sihua
    Li, Haopeng
    Wang, Dong
    He, Xijing
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [22] Early Follow-Up Outcomes of a New Zero-profile Implant Used in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Miao, Jinhao
    Shen, Ye
    Kuang, Yong
    Yang, Lili
    Wang, Xinwei
    Chen, Yu
    Chen, Deyu
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2013, 26 (05): : E193 - E197
  • [23] Preoperative Cervical Cobb Angle Is a Risk Factor for Postoperative Axial Neck Pain after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Zero-Profile Interbody
    Cao, Yuan
    Xu, Chen
    Sun, Baifeng
    Cui, Chen
    Zhang, Ke
    Wu, Huiqiao
    Qi, Min
    Xi, Yongming
    Yuan, Wen
    Shen, Xiaolong
    Liu, Yang
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (12) : 3225 - 3232
  • [24] Safety and Efficacy of Zero-Profile Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cages Filled with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate (BCP) in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Case Series
    Battistelli, Marco
    Mazzucchi, Edoardo
    Muselli, Mario
    Galieri, Gianluca
    Polli, Filippo Maria
    Pignotti, Fabrizio
    Olivi, Alessandro
    Sabatino, Giovanni
    La Rocca, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (07)
  • [25] Comparison of the incidence of post-operative dysphagia between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with the zero-profile implant system and with the traditional anterior plate
    Yang, Yi
    Ma, Litai
    Wang, Beiyu
    Hong, Ying
    Song, Yueming
    Liu, Hao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (06): : 9277 - 9287
  • [26] Incidence of dysphagia of zero-profile spacer versus cage-plate after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion A meta-analysis
    Yang, Zhongmeng
    Zhao, Yao
    Luo, Jiaquan
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (25)
  • [27] Zero-profile anchored cage reduces risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with cage with plate fixation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    ShanWen Xiao
    ZhuDe Liang
    Wu Wei
    JinPei Ning
    European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 975 - 984
  • [28] Zero-profile anchored cage reduces risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with cage with plate fixation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Xiao, ShanWen
    Liang, ZhuDe
    Wei, Wu
    Ning, JinPei
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (04) : 975 - 984
  • [29] Comparing zero-profile and conventional cage and plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using finite-element modeling
    Ahn, Chang-Hwan
    Kang, Sungwook
    Cho, Mingoo
    Kim, Seong-Hun
    Kim, Chi Heon
    Han, Inbo
    Kim, Chul-Hyun
    Noh, Sung Hyun
    Kim, Kyoung-Tae
    Hwang, Jong-Moon
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [30] Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion by zero-profile anchored cage
    Grasso, Giovanni
    Landi, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2018, 9 (02): : 87 - 92