Effects of the LGS geometry on the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor and the Pyramid wavefront sensor

被引:0
|
作者
Oyarzun, F. [1 ]
Heritier, C. T. [1 ]
Chambouleyron, V [2 ]
Fusco, T. [1 ,3 ]
Rouquette, P. [1 ]
Neichel, B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, LAM, CNES, CNRS, Marseille, France
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, 1156 High St, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[3] Univ Paris Saclay, ONERA, DOTA, F-91123 Palaiseau, France
来源
ADAPTIVE OPTICS SYSTEMS IX | 2024年 / 13097卷
关键词
Wavefront sensing; Shack-Hartmann; Pyramid wavefront sensor; laser guide star;
D O I
10.1117/12.3018283
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this work we study the effects of the laser guide star (LGS) on the measurements of both the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWFS) and the Pyramid wavefront sensor (PWFS). We started by describing the LGS geometry and the general effects on each wavefront sensor. Then, we introduced a statistical analysis to predict the centroiding variance for the SHWFS when using an LGS, which we tested for read-out noise and photon noise. We found good agreement between end-to-end simulations and the predictions of the model. We found that the centroiding variance, as expected, follows closely the elongation of the LGS, with the X and Y centroiding evolving each according to the LGS geometry. For the PWFS, we used a convolutional model to compute sensitivity maps. With these maps we could observe that the size of the LGS greately decreases the sensitivity in the low frequencies. We could also obtain a better definition of the size of the LGS, which takes into account the depth of field of the telescope, which can be used to predict the sensitivity of the instrument by computing an equivalent modulation radius equivalent to the LGS size.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Detecting error of Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
    Jiang, WH
    Xian, H
    Shen, F
    ADAPTIVE OPTICS AND APPLICATIONS, 1997, 3126 : 534 - 544
  • [22] CUMULATIVE WAVEFRONT RECONSTRUCTOR FOR THE SHACK-HARTMANN SENSOR
    Zhariy, Mariya
    Neubauer, Andreas
    Rosensteiner, Matthias
    Ramlau, Ronny
    INVERSE PROBLEMS AND IMAGING, 2011, 5 (04) : 893 - 913
  • [23] Wavefront reconstruction with the adaptive Shack-Hartmann sensor
    Seifert, L
    Tiziani, HJ
    Osten, W
    OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2005, 245 (1-6) : 255 - 269
  • [24] Effects of Shock Waves on Shack-Hartmann Wavefront Sensor Data
    Kalensky, Matthew
    Kemnetz, Matthew R.
    Spencer, Mark F.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2023, 61 (06) : 2356 - 2368
  • [25] Adaptive Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor accommodating large wavefront variations
    Aftab, Maham
    Choi, Heejoo
    Liang, Rongguang
    Kim, Dae Wook
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2018, 26 (26): : 34428 - 34441
  • [26] Measurement of wavefront aberrations of human eyes with Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
    Cheng S.-Y.
    Cao Z.-L.
    Hu L.-F.
    Mu Q.-Q.
    Li P.-F.
    Xuan L.
    Guangxue Jingmi Gongcheng/Optics and Precision Engineering, 2010, 18 (05): : 1060 - 1067
  • [27] A new wavefront sensor with polar symmetry: Quantitative comparisons with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
    Carvalho, Luis Alberto
    Castro, Jarbas
    Chamon, Wallace
    Schor, Paulo
    JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 22 (09) : 954 - 958
  • [28] Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor optical dynamic range
    Akondi, Vyas
    Dubra, Alfredo
    OPTICS EXPRESS, 2021, 29 (06) : 8417 - 8429
  • [29] Optimization for high precision Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
    Li, Chao
    Xia, Mingliang
    Liu, Zhaonan
    Li, Dayu
    Xuan, Li
    OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 282 (22) : 4333 - 4338
  • [30] Wavefront reconstruction algorithms for the adaptive Shack-Hartmann sensor
    Seifert, L
    Tiziani, HJ
    Osten, W
    Optical Measurement Systems for Industrial Inspection IV, Pts 1 and 2, 2005, 5856 : 544 - 553