Interpretable machine learning and radiomics in hip MRI diagnostics: comparing ONFH and OA predictions to experts

被引:0
|
作者
Alkhatatbeh, Tariq [1 ]
Alkhatatbeh, Ahmad [2 ]
Guo, Qin [1 ]
Chen, Jiechen [2 ]
Song, Jidong [3 ]
Qin, Xingru [4 ]
Wei, Wang [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Comprehens Orthoped Surg Dept, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Shantou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Med Coll, Dept Orthoped, Shantou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Orthoped Dept, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 2025年 / 16卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
radiomics; machine learning; osteonecrosis; osteoarthritis; hip; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2025.1532248
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Purpose Distinguishing between Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and Osteoarthritis (OA) can be subjective and vary between users with different backgrounds and expertise. This study aimed to construct and evaluate several Radiomics-based machine learning models using MRI to differentiate between those two disorders and compare their efficacies to those of medical experts.Methods 140 MRI scans were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical records. They were split into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. Handcrafted radiomics features were harvested following the careful manual segmentation of the regions of interest (ROI). After thoroughly selecting these features, various machine learning models have been constructed. The evaluation was carried out using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Then NaiveBayes (NB) was selected to establish our final Radiomics-model as it performed the best. Three users with different expertise and backgrounds diagnosed and labeled the dataset into either OA or ONFH. Their results have been compared to our Radiomics-model.Results The amount of handcrafted radiomics features was 1197 before processing; after the final selection, only 12 key features were retained and used. User 1 had an AUC of 0.632 (95% CI 0.4801-0.7843), User 2 recorded an AUC of 0.565 (95% CI 0.4102-0.7196); while User 3 was on top with an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI 0.7753-0.9843). On the other hand, the Radiomics model attained an AUC of 0.971 (95% CI 0.9298-1.0000); showing greater efficacy than all other users. It also demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.937 and a specificity of 0.885. DCA (Decision Curve Analysis displayed that the radiomics-model had a greater clinical benefit in differentiating OA and ONFH.Conclusion We have successfully constructed and evaluated an interpretable radiomics-based machine learning model that could distinguish between OA and ONFH. This method has the ability to aid both junior and senior medical professionals to precisely diagnose and take prompt treatment measures.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting 10-Year Total Hip Arthroplasty Risk
    Jang, Seong Jun
    Fontana, Mark A.
    Kunze, Kyle N.
    Anderson, Christopher G.
    Sculco, Thomas P.
    Mayman, David J.
    Jerabek, Seth A.
    Vigdorchik, Jonathan M.
    Sculco, Peter K.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (07): : S44 - +
  • [42] Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Predictions of Methane Uptake Isotherms in Metal-Organic Frameworks
    Gurnani, Rishi
    Yu, Zhenzi
    Kim, Chiho
    Sholl, David S.
    Ramprasad, Rampi
    CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS, 2021, 33 (10) : 3543 - 3552
  • [43] Segmentation of mature human oocytes provides interpretable and improved blastocyst outcome predictions by a machine learning model
    Fjeldstad, Jullin
    Qi, Weikai
    Siddique, Nadia
    Mercuri, Natalie
    Nayot, Dan
    Krivoi, Alex
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [44] Interpretable machine-learning models for maximum displacements of RC beams under impact loading predictions
    Lai, Dade
    Demartino, Cristoforo
    Xiao, Yan
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 281
  • [45] Comparing Anatomic and Functional MRI Predictors of Cognition via Machine Learning
    James, George
    Martins, Bradford
    Chung, Ming-Hua
    Kilts, Clinton
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 42 : S399 - S400
  • [46] Machine learning-based CT radiomics enhances bladder cancer staging predictions: A comparative study of clinical, radiomics, and combined models
    Xiong, Situ
    Fu, Zhehong
    Deng, Zhikang
    Li, Sheng
    Zhan, Xiangpeng
    Zheng, Fuchun
    Yang, Hailang
    Liu, Xiaoqiang
    Xu, Songhui
    Liu, Hao
    Fan, Bing
    Dong, Wentao
    Song, Yanping
    Fu, Bin
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, : 5965 - 5977
  • [47] Advancing thyroid care: An accurate trustworthy diagnostics system with interpretable AI and hybrid machine learning techniques
    Sutradhar, Ananda
    Akter, Sharmin
    Shamrat, F. M. Javed Mehedi
    Ghosh, Pronab
    Zhou, Xujuan
    Bin Idris, Mohd Yamani Idna
    Ahmed, Kawsar
    Moni, Mohammad Ali
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (17)
  • [48] Image Quality Assessment to Emulate Experts' Perception in Lumbar MRI Using Machine Learning
    Chabert, Steren
    Castro, Juan Sebastian
    Munoz, Leonardo
    Cox, Pablo
    Riveros, Rodrigo
    Vielma, Juan
    Huerta, Gamaliel
    Querales, Marvin
    Saavedra, Carolina
    Veloz, Alejandro
    Salas, Rodrigo
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (14):
  • [49] Boosting phase contrast MRI performance in iNPH diagnostics by means of machine learning
    Vlasak, Ales
    Gerla, Vaclav
    Skalicky, Petr
    Mladek, Arnost
    Sedlak, Vojtech
    Vrana, Jiri
    Whitley, Helen
    Lhotska, Lenka
    Benes, Vladimir, Sr.
    Benes, Vladimir, Jr.
    Bubenikova, Adela
    Bradac, Ondrej
    FLUIDS AND BARRIERS OF THE CNS, 2022, 19
  • [50] Identification of texture MRI brain abnormalities on Fibromyalgia syndrome using interpretable machine learning models
    Jiang, Hongyang
    Liu, Aihui
    Ying, Zhenhua
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):