Interpretable machine learning and radiomics in hip MRI diagnostics: comparing ONFH and OA predictions to experts

被引:0
|
作者
Alkhatatbeh, Tariq [1 ]
Alkhatatbeh, Ahmad [2 ]
Guo, Qin [1 ]
Chen, Jiechen [2 ]
Song, Jidong [3 ]
Qin, Xingru [4 ]
Wei, Wang [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Comprehens Orthoped Surg Dept, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Shantou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Med Coll, Dept Orthoped, Shantou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Orthoped Dept, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Radiol, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 2025年 / 16卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
radiomics; machine learning; osteonecrosis; osteoarthritis; hip; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2025.1532248
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Purpose Distinguishing between Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and Osteoarthritis (OA) can be subjective and vary between users with different backgrounds and expertise. This study aimed to construct and evaluate several Radiomics-based machine learning models using MRI to differentiate between those two disorders and compare their efficacies to those of medical experts.Methods 140 MRI scans were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical records. They were split into training and testing sets in a 7:3 ratio. Handcrafted radiomics features were harvested following the careful manual segmentation of the regions of interest (ROI). After thoroughly selecting these features, various machine learning models have been constructed. The evaluation was carried out using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Then NaiveBayes (NB) was selected to establish our final Radiomics-model as it performed the best. Three users with different expertise and backgrounds diagnosed and labeled the dataset into either OA or ONFH. Their results have been compared to our Radiomics-model.Results The amount of handcrafted radiomics features was 1197 before processing; after the final selection, only 12 key features were retained and used. User 1 had an AUC of 0.632 (95% CI 0.4801-0.7843), User 2 recorded an AUC of 0.565 (95% CI 0.4102-0.7196); while User 3 was on top with an AUC of 0.880 (95% CI 0.7753-0.9843). On the other hand, the Radiomics model attained an AUC of 0.971 (95% CI 0.9298-1.0000); showing greater efficacy than all other users. It also demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.937 and a specificity of 0.885. DCA (Decision Curve Analysis displayed that the radiomics-model had a greater clinical benefit in differentiating OA and ONFH.Conclusion We have successfully constructed and evaluated an interpretable radiomics-based machine learning model that could distinguish between OA and ONFH. This method has the ability to aid both junior and senior medical professionals to precisely diagnose and take prompt treatment measures.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pulmonary MRI Radiomics and Machine Learning: Effect of Intralesional Heterogeneity on Classification of Lesion
    Wang, Xinhui
    Li, Xinchun
    Chen, Houjin
    Peng, Yahui
    Li, Yanfeng
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 : S73 - S81
  • [22] Handcrafted MRI radiomics and machine learning: Classification of indeterminate solid adrenal lesions
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Verde, Francesco
    Galatola, Roberta
    Romeo, Valeria
    Mainenti, Pier Paolo
    Aprea, Giovanni
    Guadagno, Elia
    De Caro, Marialaura Del Basso
    Maurea, Simone
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 79 : 52 - 58
  • [23] MRI radiomics: A machine learning approach for the risk stratification of endometrial cancer patients
    Mainenti, Pier Paolo
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Del Grosso, Renata
    Danzi, Roberta
    Romeo, Valeria
    Raffone, Antonio
    Sardo, Attilio Di Spiezio
    Giordano, Elena
    Travaglino, Antonio
    Insabato, Luigi
    Scaglione, Mariano
    Maurea, Simone
    Brunetti, Arturo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 149
  • [24] ComBat Harmonization for MRI Radiomics Impact on Nonbinary Tissue Classification by Machine Learning
    Leithner, Doris
    Nevin, Rachel B.
    Gibbs, Peter
    Weber, Michael
    Otazo, Ricardo
    Vargas, H. Alberto
    Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2023, 58 (09) : 697 - 701
  • [25] Classifying Dementia Severity Using MRI Radiomics Analysis of the Hippocampus and Machine Learning
    Shih, Dong-Her
    Wu, Yi-Huei
    Wu, Ting-Wei
    Wang, Yi-Kai
    Shih, Ming-Hung
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 160030 - 160051
  • [26] Advancing NSCLC pathological subtype prediction with interpretable machine learning: a comprehensive radiomics-based approach
    Kuang, Bingling
    Zhang, Jingxuan
    Zhang, Mingqi
    Xia, Haoming
    Qiang, Guangliang
    Zhang, Jiangyu
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [27] Interpretable Machine Learning-Tools to Interpret the Predictions of a Machine Learning Model Predicting the Electrical Energy Consumption of an Electric Arc Furnace
    Carlsson, Leo Stefan
    Samuelsson, Peter Bengt
    Jonsson, Par Goran
    STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 91 (11)
  • [28] Machine learning outperforms human experts in MRI pattern analysis of muscular dystrophies
    Morrow, Jasper M.
    Sormani, Maria Pia
    NEUROLOGY, 2020, 94 (10) : 421 - 422
  • [29] Radiomics and Machine Learning Can Differentiate Transient Osteoporosis from Avascular Necrosis of the Hip
    Klontzas, Michail E.
    Manikis, Georgios C.
    Nikiforaki, Katerina
    Vassalou, Evangelia E.
    Spanakis, Konstantinos
    Stathis, Ioannis
    Kakkos, George A.
    Matthaiou, Nikolas
    Zibis, Aristeidis H.
    Marias, Kostas
    Karantanas, Apostolos H.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (09)
  • [30] Comparing Machine Learning Techniques for Predictions of Motorway Segment Crash Risk Level
    Nikolaou, Dimitrios
    Ziakopoulos, Apostolos
    Dragomanovits, Anastasios
    Roussou, Julia
    Yannis, George
    SAFETY, 2023, 9 (02)