A New Pilot Hole Preparation System for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement A Randomized Controlled Study

被引:0
|
作者
Feng, Chaobo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Longfei [1 ]
Yang, Sheng [1 ]
Wu, Xinbo [1 ]
Fan, Yunshan [1 ]
Yan, Huang [1 ]
Chen, Fangjing [1 ]
Chen, Jia [1 ]
Wang, Xiang [1 ]
Guo, Qishuai [1 ]
Yao, Longxiang [1 ]
Zhao, Yingchuan [1 ]
He, Shisheng [1 ]
Ni, Haijian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Spinal Pain Res Inst, Dept Orthoped,Sch Med, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Sch Biomed Engn, Guangdong Key Lab Biomed Measurements & Ultrasound, Natl Reg Key Technol Engn Lab Med Ultrasound,Med S, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Pain Med, Union Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
lumbar interbody fusion; minimally invasive spine surgery; percutaneous pedicle screw; pilot hole; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; ACCURACY; TIME;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000005184
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A randomized controlled study. Objective. To introduce a new pilot hole preparation system for percutaneous pedicle screw placement and investigate its efficiency and safety in comparison with the conventional method. Summary of Background Data. Placing screws accurately, rapidly, and safely with less radiation exposure is critical for minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). Optimizing pilot hole preparation instruments has important clinical implications. Materials and Methods. A total of 60 patients (180 screws) were included in this study. All patients were randomized into two groups (new system vs. conventional method) and performed single-level minimally invasive percutaneous fixation, interbody fusion, and unilateral decompression. Basic information, time of pilot hole preparation, time of screw placement, and fluoroscopy time were recorded. Screw placement accuracy was graded based on the Gertzbein-Robbins scale, and the angle between the screw axis and the pedicle axis was collected in postoperative CT. Results. There was no statistical difference in basic information between the 2 groups. The mean time of single pilot hole preparation was 4.08 +/- 1.01 minutes in the new system group and 5.34 +/- 1.30 minutes in the conventional method group (P<0.001). The time of single screw placement was significantly shorter in the new system group (0.82 +/- 0.20 vs. 1.72 +/- 0.33 min), and the fluoroscopy time was also less in the new system group (13.70 +/- 3.42 vs. 19.95 +/- 5.50 s) (P<0.001). Screw placement accuracy assessment showed that there were 85 (94.45%) A-grade screws in the new system group while 76 (84.44%) A-grade screws in the conventional method group (P=0.027). Conclusions. The new pilot hole preparation system has shown significant reductions in the time of pilot hole preparation, time of screw placement, and radiation exposure, and has good clinical application value.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 121
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of pilot hole preparation technique on pedicle screw fixation in different regions of the osteoporotic thoracic and lumbar spine
    Carmouche, JJ
    Molinari, RW
    Gerlinger, T
    Devine, J
    Patience, T
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 3 (05) : 364 - 370
  • [32] An Integrated 3-Dimentional Navigation System Increases the Accuracy, Efficiency, and Safety of Percutaneous Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Approaches: A Randomized Cadaveric Study
    Lakomkin, Nikita
    Eastlack, Robert K.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Park, Paul
    Ryu, Stephen I.
    Kretzer, Ryan
    Mimran, Ronnie I.
    Holman, Paul
    Veeravagu, Anand
    Hassanzadeh, Hamid
    Johnson, Michele M.
    Sullivan, Linda
    Clark, Aaron
    Mundis, Gregory M.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [33] Pedicle screw piercer with warning device - A technique to increase accuracy of pedicle screw placement A cadaveric study
    Lin Bin
    He Yong
    Xu Yang
    Zhang Bi
    Sha Mo
    Guo Zhi-Min
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 48 (06) : 545 - 549
  • [34] A robotic system for spine surgery positioning and pedicle screw placement
    Zhang, Jian
    Li, Weishi
    Hu, Lei
    Zhao, Yu
    Wang, Tianmiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (04):
  • [35] MINIMALLY INVASIVE PERCUTANEOUS SCREW PLACEMENT VERSUS OPEN PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION IN THE TREATMENT OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES
    Liu, Yang
    Zhang, Heng
    Ao, Shengxiang
    Pei, Lijia
    Zhou, Xinshe
    ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA, 2023, 39 (03): : 859 - 863
  • [36] Augmented reality surgical navigation with ultrasound-assisted registration for pedicle screw placement: a pilot study
    Longfei Ma
    Zhe Zhao
    Fang Chen
    Boyu Zhang
    Ligong Fu
    Hongen Liao
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2017, 12 : 2205 - 2215
  • [37] Augmented reality surgical navigation with ultrasound-assisted registration for pedicle screw placement: a pilot study
    Ma, Longfei
    Zhao, Zhe
    Chen, Fang
    Zhang, Boyu
    Fu, Ligong
    Liao, Hongen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2017, 12 (12) : 2205 - 2215
  • [38] Reduction in Radiation Exposure in Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement Using a Tubular Retractor: A Pilot Study
    Oki, Takeshi
    Lefor, Alan Kawarai
    Nakamura, Kentaro
    Higashi, Takahiro
    Oki, Isao
    TOMOGRAPHY, 2023, 9 (01) : 12 - 24
  • [39] Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcome Between Mini-Open Wiltse Approach and Fluoroscopic-Guided Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Zou, Peng
    Yang, Jun-Song
    Wang, Xiang-Fu
    Wei, Jian-Min
    Liu, Peng
    Chen, Hao
    Hao, Ding-Jun
    Li, Qing-Da
    Wei, Dongmei
    Gong, Han-Lin
    Wu, Xu-Cai
    Liu, Ben-Yin
    Zhang, Yu-Ting
    Zhang, Xue-Fang
    Zhao, Yuan-Ting
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 144 : E368 - E375
  • [40] Effect of pilot hole on biomechanical and in vivo pedicle screw-bone interface
    Silva, Patricia
    Rosa, Rodrigo Cesar
    Shimano, Antonio Carlos
    Defino, Helton L. A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (08) : 1829 - 1836