A New Pilot Hole Preparation System for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement A Randomized Controlled Study

被引:0
|
作者
Feng, Chaobo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Longfei [1 ]
Yang, Sheng [1 ]
Wu, Xinbo [1 ]
Fan, Yunshan [1 ]
Yan, Huang [1 ]
Chen, Fangjing [1 ]
Chen, Jia [1 ]
Wang, Xiang [1 ]
Guo, Qishuai [1 ]
Yao, Longxiang [1 ]
Zhao, Yingchuan [1 ]
He, Shisheng [1 ]
Ni, Haijian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Spinal Pain Res Inst, Dept Orthoped,Sch Med, Shanghai 200072, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Sch Biomed Engn, Guangdong Key Lab Biomed Measurements & Ultrasound, Natl Reg Key Technol Engn Lab Med Ultrasound,Med S, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Pain Med, Union Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
关键词
lumbar interbody fusion; minimally invasive spine surgery; percutaneous pedicle screw; pilot hole; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; ACCURACY; TIME;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000005184
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A randomized controlled study. Objective. To introduce a new pilot hole preparation system for percutaneous pedicle screw placement and investigate its efficiency and safety in comparison with the conventional method. Summary of Background Data. Placing screws accurately, rapidly, and safely with less radiation exposure is critical for minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion (LIF). Optimizing pilot hole preparation instruments has important clinical implications. Materials and Methods. A total of 60 patients (180 screws) were included in this study. All patients were randomized into two groups (new system vs. conventional method) and performed single-level minimally invasive percutaneous fixation, interbody fusion, and unilateral decompression. Basic information, time of pilot hole preparation, time of screw placement, and fluoroscopy time were recorded. Screw placement accuracy was graded based on the Gertzbein-Robbins scale, and the angle between the screw axis and the pedicle axis was collected in postoperative CT. Results. There was no statistical difference in basic information between the 2 groups. The mean time of single pilot hole preparation was 4.08 +/- 1.01 minutes in the new system group and 5.34 +/- 1.30 minutes in the conventional method group (P<0.001). The time of single screw placement was significantly shorter in the new system group (0.82 +/- 0.20 vs. 1.72 +/- 0.33 min), and the fluoroscopy time was also less in the new system group (13.70 +/- 3.42 vs. 19.95 +/- 5.50 s) (P<0.001). Screw placement accuracy assessment showed that there were 85 (94.45%) A-grade screws in the new system group while 76 (84.44%) A-grade screws in the conventional method group (P=0.027). Conclusions. The new pilot hole preparation system has shown significant reductions in the time of pilot hole preparation, time of screw placement, and radiation exposure, and has good clinical application value.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 121
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy and safety of percutaneous pedicle screw placement using the K-wireless minimally invasive spine percutaneous pedicle screw system in Japan: A randomized active controlled study
    Ohmori, Kazuo
    Terayama, Sei
    Ono, Koichiro
    Sakamoto, Miyuki
    Horikoshi, Yukie
    NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2022, 10
  • [2] Hybrid Technique for Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Combination of Miniopen Surgery and Use of a Percutaneous Cannula System-Pilot Study
    Kim, Moon-Kyu
    Cho, Sung-Min
    You, Seung-Hoon
    Kim, In-Beom
    Kwak, Dai-Soon
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (15) : 1181 - 1186
  • [3] Tracked Ultrasound Snapshots in Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Navigation: A Feasibility Study
    Ungi, Tamas
    Moult, Eric
    Schwab, Joseph H.
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (12) : 4047 - 4055
  • [4] Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Aided by a New Drill Guide Template Combined with Fluoroscopy: An Accuracy Study
    Wu, Chao
    Deng, Jiayan
    Li, Tao
    Tan, Lun
    Yuan, Dechao
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (02) : 471 - 479
  • [5] Augmented reality-navigated pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric pilot study
    José Miguel Spirig
    Simon Roner
    Florentin Liebmann
    Philipp Fürnstahl
    Mazda Farshad
    European Spine Journal, 2021, 30 : 3731 - 3737
  • [6] Augmented reality-navigated pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric pilot study
    Spirig, Jose Miguel
    Roner, Simon
    Liebmann, Florentin
    Furnstahl, Philipp
    Farshad, Mazda
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 30 (12) : 3731 - 3737
  • [7] Reduction in radiation during percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement using a new device
    Zhang, Lei
    Zhou, Xu
    Cai, Xiaobing
    Zhang, Hailong
    Fu, Qingsong
    He, Shisheng
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 23 (3-4) : 173 - 178
  • [8] Radiation Exposure to the Surgeon During Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    Abdullah, Kalil G.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    Klineberg, Eric O.
    Lieberman, Isador H.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (04): : 264 - 267
  • [9] Facet Joint Violation During Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement
    Tannous, Oliver
    Jazini, Ehsan
    Weir, Tristan B.
    Banagan, Kelley E.
    Koh, Eugene Y.
    Anderson, D. Greg
    Gelb, Daniel E.
    Ludwig, Steven C.
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (15) : 1189 - 1194
  • [10] Radiographic verification of pedicle screw pilot hole placement using Kirshner wires versus beaded wires
    Myles, RT
    Fong, B
    Esses, SI
    Hipp, JA
    SPINE, 1999, 24 (05) : 476 - 480