Effects of cue location and object orientation on object-based attention

被引:0
|
作者
Lou, Hao [1 ]
Pilz, Karin S. [1 ,2 ]
Lorist, Monicque M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Expt Psychol, Grote Kruisstr 2-1, NL-9712 TS Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Cito Inst Test Dev, Arnhem, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Cognit Neurosci Ctr, Dept Biomed Sci Cells & Syst, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Spatial attention; Object-based attention; Cue location; Object orientation; VISUAL-ATTENTION; ASYMMETRIES; SELECTION; TARGET; BIASES; ADVANTAGE; HEMIFIELD; MODULATE; SEARCH; FIELDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2024.108521
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Spatial cues have previously been found to facilitate information processing not only at cued locations but also within cued objects, so-called object-based attention. We used different variants of the classic two-rectangle paradigm to investigate the interaction of cue location and object orientation on object-based attentional effects. First, we re-analyzed data from a prior study using the classical two-rectangle paradigm. We expected faster attentional shifts along the horizontal compared to the vertical meridian. Results confirmed that cue location and rectangle orientation interactively influence object-based attention, with horizontal objects combined with upper left visual field cues eliciting faster responses than other conditions. In Experiment 2, we removed object contours to examine the benefits of shifting attention based purely on cue location. The results showed that these differences remained, indicating that attentional shifts are not solely guided by object contours. In Experiment 3, we added a third possible target location to the original two-rectangle experiment to examine whether attentional shifts followed a predictable pattern across the stimulus display. Despite faster responses to cued targets, no consistent and organized visual search pattern was observed when participants searched for targets at invalidly cued locations. Our findings suggest that object-based effects are influenced by both cue location and the orientation of attentional shifts. Shifts from left to right in the upper visual field consistently demonstrated significant benefits, whereas the benefits of vertical shifts were less consistent across experiments.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Object-based attention occurs regardless of object awareness
    Wei-Lun Chou
    Su-Ling Yeh
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2012, 19 : 225 - 231
  • [32] The effects of visual search efficiency on object-based attention
    Greenberg, Adam S.
    Rosen, Maya
    Cutrone, Elizabeth
    Behrmann, Marlene
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2015, 77 (05) : 1544 - 1557
  • [33] The effects of visual search efficiency on object-based attention
    Adam S. Greenberg
    Maya Rosen
    Elizabeth Cutrone
    Marlene Behrmann
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2015, 77 : 1544 - 1557
  • [34] Distinct mechanisms subserve location- and object-based visual attention
    Chou, Wei-Lun
    Yeh, Su-Ling
    Chen, Chien-Chung
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [35] Object-based and location-based shifting of attention in Parkinson's disease
    Hsieh, SL
    Lee, CY
    Hwang, WJ
    Tsai, JJ
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1997, 85 (03) : 1315 - 1325
  • [36] Object-based auditory and visual attention
    Shinn-Cunningham, Barbara G.
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2008, 12 (05) : 182 - 186
  • [37] Neural Mechanisms of Object-Based Attention
    Cohen, Elias H.
    Tong, Frank
    CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2015, 25 (04) : 1080 - 1092
  • [38] How Prevalent Is Object-Based Attention?
    Pilz, Karin S.
    Roggeveen, Alexa B.
    Creighton, Sarah E.
    Bennett, Patrick J.
    Sekuler, Allison B.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (02):
  • [39] Object-based attention: Shifting or uncertainty?
    Leslie Drummond
    Sarah Shomstein
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2010, 72 : 1743 - 1755
  • [40] Overt and covert object-based attention
    McCarley, JS
    Kramer, AF
    Peterson, MS
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2002, 9 (04) : 751 - 758