Effects of cue location and object orientation on object-based attention

被引:0
|
作者
Lou, Hao [1 ]
Pilz, Karin S. [1 ,2 ]
Lorist, Monicque M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Expt Psychol, Grote Kruisstr 2-1, NL-9712 TS Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Cito Inst Test Dev, Arnhem, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Cognit Neurosci Ctr, Dept Biomed Sci Cells & Syst, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Spatial attention; Object-based attention; Cue location; Object orientation; VISUAL-ATTENTION; ASYMMETRIES; SELECTION; TARGET; BIASES; ADVANTAGE; HEMIFIELD; MODULATE; SEARCH; FIELDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2024.108521
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Spatial cues have previously been found to facilitate information processing not only at cued locations but also within cued objects, so-called object-based attention. We used different variants of the classic two-rectangle paradigm to investigate the interaction of cue location and object orientation on object-based attentional effects. First, we re-analyzed data from a prior study using the classical two-rectangle paradigm. We expected faster attentional shifts along the horizontal compared to the vertical meridian. Results confirmed that cue location and rectangle orientation interactively influence object-based attention, with horizontal objects combined with upper left visual field cues eliciting faster responses than other conditions. In Experiment 2, we removed object contours to examine the benefits of shifting attention based purely on cue location. The results showed that these differences remained, indicating that attentional shifts are not solely guided by object contours. In Experiment 3, we added a third possible target location to the original two-rectangle experiment to examine whether attentional shifts followed a predictable pattern across the stimulus display. Despite faster responses to cued targets, no consistent and organized visual search pattern was observed when participants searched for targets at invalidly cued locations. Our findings suggest that object-based effects are influenced by both cue location and the orientation of attentional shifts. Shifts from left to right in the upper visual field consistently demonstrated significant benefits, whereas the benefits of vertical shifts were less consistent across experiments.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Object-based attention in evolution
    Ushitani, Tomokazu
    Fujii, Kazuki
    Katsube, Maki
    Hoshino, Yukiko
    Goto, Kazuhiro
    Imura, Tomoko
    Tomonaga, Masaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 252 - 252
  • [22] Morphing and object-based attention
    Hillstrom, AP
    Chai, YC
    Norris, B
    PERCEPTION, 2003, 32 : 44 - 44
  • [23] Suppression in object-based attention
    Couperus, Jane W.
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2019, 27 (02) : 93 - 108
  • [24] The Architecture of Object-Based Attention
    Patrick Cavanagh
    Gideon P. Caplovitz
    Taissa K. Lytchenko
    Marvin R. Maechler
    Peter U. Tse
    David L. Sheinberg
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2023, 30 : 1643 - 1667
  • [25] Is object-based attention mandatory?
    Yeari, Menahem
    Goldsmith, Morris
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2007, 15 (01) : 119 - 123
  • [26] The influence of object similarity and orientation on object-based cueing
    Hein, Elisabeth
    Blaschke, Stefan
    Rolke, Bettina
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2017, 79 (01) : 63 - 77
  • [27] The influence of object similarity and orientation on object-based cueing
    Elisabeth Hein
    Stefan Blaschke
    Bettina Rolke
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2017, 79 : 63 - 77
  • [28] Object-based attention occurs regardless of object awareness
    Chou, Wei-Lun
    Yeh, Su-Ling
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2012, 19 (02) : 225 - 231
  • [29] Object-based attention occurs regardless of object awareness
    Chou, W-L
    Yeh, S-L
    PERCEPTION, 2011, 40 : 65 - 66
  • [30] Object-Based Attention Is Accentuated by Object Reward Association
    Grignolio, Damiano
    Acunzo, David J.
    Hickey, Clayton
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2024, 50 (03) : 280 - 294