An early economic evaluation of active surveillance for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ

被引:0
|
作者
Byng, Danalyn [1 ,2 ]
Schaapveld, Michael [1 ]
Lips, Esther H. [3 ]
van Duijnhoven, Frederieke H. [4 ]
Wesseling, Jelle [3 ,5 ]
van Harten, Wim H. [1 ,2 ]
Retel, Valesca P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Div Psychosocial Res & Epidemiol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Div Mol Pathol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Div Surg Oncol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Leiden Univ Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
active surveillance; biomarkers; cost-effectiveness; ductal carcinoma in situ; early economic evaluation; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; INVASIVE BREAST-CANCER; CONTINUOUS-TIME; MARKOV-MODELS; PHASE-III; FOLLOW-UP; RADIOTHERAPY; RECURRENCE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1080/14796694.2024.2421152
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: Perform early economic evaluation comparing active surveillance (AS) to surgery for women with low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ, a precursor of invasive breast cancer. Materials & methods: A 10-year incremental costs (Euro) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared between a simulated cohort of women undergoing breast conserving surgery +/- radiotherapy, and a cohort with a low-risk subgroup undergoing AS using a semi-Markov model. Scenario and headroom analyses evaluated a better-performing biomarker to select low-risk women for AS. Results: AS resulted in lower costs and survival, but higher QALYs (0.40). Scenario analyses maintained survival outcomes and maximized QALYs. Conclusion: AS for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ is cost-effective, but a better-performing biomarker to select low-risk women can maximize quality-adjusted outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:3451 / 3462
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Active Surveillance as a Management Option for Low-risk Basal Cell Carcinoma
    Linos, Eleni
    Chren, Mary-Margaret
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 181 (08) : 1032 - 1033
  • [23] Early Experience With Active Surveillance in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated
    Ha, Ji Yong
    Kim, Byung Hoon
    Park, Choal Hee
    Kim, Chun Il
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 55 (03) : 167 - 171
  • [24] Is excision alone adequate treatment for low-risk ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast?
    Solin, LJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (07) : 1017 - 1019
  • [25] Treating low-risk Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) ... or not? Qualitative study of patient perspectives
    Hersch, Jolyn
    Nickel, Brooke
    Dixon, Ann
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Saunders, Christobel
    Jansen, Jesse
    Rutherford, Claudia
    Barratt, Alexandra
    Spillane, Andrew
    Wylie, Liz
    Stuart, Kirsty
    Robertson, Geraldine
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 122 - 122
  • [26] Can MRI biomarkers at 3 T identify low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ?
    Rahbar, Habib
    Parsian, Sana
    Lam, Diana L.
    Dontchos, Brian N.
    Andeen, Nicole K.
    Rendi, Mara H.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Partridge, Savannah C.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (01) : 125 - 129
  • [27] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 225 - 230
  • [28] Active Surveillance of Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer
    Zanocco, Kyle A.
    Hershman, Jerome M.
    Leung, Angela M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (20): : 2020 - 2021
  • [29] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Herlemann, Annika
    Stief, Christian G.
    UROLOGE, 2016, 55 (02): : 269 - 278
  • [30] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Hadjipavlou, Marios
    Promponas, John
    Madaan, Sanjeev
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2015, 8 (06) : 420 - 428