Open and minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair for patients with previous prostatectomy: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Kasakewitch, Joao Pedro Goncalves [1 ]
da Silveira, Carlos A. Balthazar [2 ]
Inaba, Marina Eguchi [3 ]
Nogueira, Raquel [4 ]
Rasador, Ana Caroline Dias [2 ]
Lima, Diego L. [4 ]
Malcher, Flavio [5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Bahiana Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dom Joao VI Ave 275, BR-40290000 Brotas, BA, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Surg, 740 Botucatu St, BR-04023062 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[4] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 1825 Eastchester Rd, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[5] NYU Langone, Div Gen Surg, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
Inguinal hernia; Prostatectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Laparoscopic surgery; Robotic surgery; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SAFE;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-025-03323-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair (IHR) after prostatectomy has been considered a challenging procedure due to the presence of scar tissue and adhesions. We aimed to compare the outcomes of open and MIS IHR outcomes in post-prostatectomy patients through a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis. Material & methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for studies on open and MIS IHR after prostatectomy. Outcomes such as recurrence, complications, seroma, hematoma, SSI, and conversion rates were analyzed, with subgroup analyses conducted for open, TEP, and TAPP procedures. Results Among 402 screened studies, 18 met the inclusion criteria, covering 8,668 open IHR (64.6%) and 4,761 MIS IHR (35.4%) patients. The rate per 100 events for intraoperative complications was 0.19 (95% CI [0.00; 0.76]; I2 = 71%;), 5.22 per 100 for seroma (95% CI [2.86; 9.34]; I2 = 92%), 0.83 per 100 for SSI (95% CI [0.39; 1.75]; I2 = 48%), 3.16 per 100 for hematoma (95% CI [1.16; 8.31]; I2 = 84%), 3.02 per 100 patients for chronic pain (95% CI [2.53; 3.62]; I2 = 13%), and 0.02 per 100 for recurrence (95% CI [0; 0.16]; I2 = 10%). The conversion rate for MIS was 1.66 per 100 (95% CI [0.89; 3.06]; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference between TEP and TAPP in intraoperative complications (p = 0.70), but a lower seroma rate in TAPP compared to TEP (5.29 vs. 20 per 100; P = 0.01). MIS had significant reduction in SSI (0.08 vs. 0.34 per 100; P < 0.01), hematoma (1.29 vs. 17.86; p < 0.01), and recurrence (0.08 vs. 0.37; p = 0.04) compared to open, with no difference in seroma rates. Funnel plots revealed no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions In experienced hands, MIS IHR is a safe and effective option for post-prostatectomy patients, with lower complication rates compared to open IHR, although high-quality comparative studies are needed to establish definitive conclusions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal mesh in minimally invasive ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    M. Yeow
    S. Wijerathne
    D. Lomanto
    Hernia, 2022, 26 : 533 - 541
  • [32] Body Mass Index Effect on Minimally Invasive Ventral Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    de Figueiredo, Sergio Mazzola Poli
    Mao, Rui-Min Diana
    Dela Tejera, Giovanna
    Tastaldi, Luciano
    Villasante-Tezanos, Alejandro
    Lu, Richard
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (06): : 663 - 672
  • [33] CONTRIBUTING FACTORS IN THE UTILIZATION OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUES FOR VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Skoczek, Alexandra C.
    Holland, Alexander B.
    Fogleman, Brody M.
    Fernandez, Dennis
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S1842 - S1843
  • [34] Intraperitoneal versus extraperitoneal mesh in minimally invasive ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yeow, M.
    Wijerathne, S.
    Lomanto, D.
    HERNIA, 2022, 26 (02) : 533 - 541
  • [35] The impact of smoking on ventral and inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    da Silveira, Carlos Andre Balthazar
    Rasador, Ana Caroline
    Lima, Diego L.
    Kasmirski, Julia
    Kasakewitch, Joao P. G.
    Nogueira, Raquel
    Malcher, Flavio
    Sreeramoju, Prashanth
    HERNIA, 2024, 28 (06) : 2079 - 2095
  • [36] Robotic surgery for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de'Angelis, Nicola
    Schena, Carlo Alberto
    Moszkowicz, David
    Kuperas, Cyril
    Fara, Regis
    Gaujoux, Sebastien
    Gillion, Jean-Francois
    Gronnier, Caroline
    Loriau, Jerome
    Mathonnet, Muriel
    Oberlin, Olivier
    Perez, Manuela
    Renard, Yohann
    Romain, Benoit
    Passot, Guillaume
    Pessaux, Patrick
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (01): : 24 - 46
  • [37] Robotic surgery for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nicola de’Angelis
    Carlo Alberto Schena
    David Moszkowicz
    Cyril Kuperas
    Régis Fara
    Sébastien Gaujoux
    Jean-François Gillion
    Caroline Gronnier
    Jérôme Loriau
    Muriel Mathonnet
    Olivier Oberlin
    Manuela Perez
    Yohann Renard
    Benoît Romain
    Guillaume Passot
    Patrick Pessaux
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2024, 38 : 24 - 46
  • [38] Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy—systematic review and meta-analysis
    Michał Pędziwiatr
    Piotr Małczak
    Magdalena Pisarska
    Piotr Major
    Michał Wysocki
    Tomasz Stefura
    Andrzej Budzyński
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2017, 402 : 841 - 851
  • [39] Systematic review and Meta-analysis: Local, regional and general anaesthesia for elective open inguinal hernia repair in adults
    Pallett, S.
    Sanjay, P.
    Hotouras, A.
    Ogston, S. A.
    Thaha, M. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 : 157 - 157
  • [40] The Incidence of Recurrence after Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jiandong Lu
    Chengjun Yu
    Jie Zhao
    Shengde Wu
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2021, 83 : 625 - 633