Open and minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair for patients with previous prostatectomy: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Kasakewitch, Joao Pedro Goncalves [1 ]
da Silveira, Carlos A. Balthazar [2 ]
Inaba, Marina Eguchi [3 ]
Nogueira, Raquel [4 ]
Rasador, Ana Caroline Dias [2 ]
Lima, Diego L. [4 ]
Malcher, Flavio [5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Bahiana Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dom Joao VI Ave 275, BR-40290000 Brotas, BA, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Surg, 740 Botucatu St, BR-04023062 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[4] Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 1825 Eastchester Rd, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[5] NYU Langone, Div Gen Surg, 550 1st Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
Inguinal hernia; Prostatectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Laparoscopic surgery; Robotic surgery; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SAFE;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-025-03323-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair (IHR) after prostatectomy has been considered a challenging procedure due to the presence of scar tissue and adhesions. We aimed to compare the outcomes of open and MIS IHR outcomes in post-prostatectomy patients through a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis. Material & methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for studies on open and MIS IHR after prostatectomy. Outcomes such as recurrence, complications, seroma, hematoma, SSI, and conversion rates were analyzed, with subgroup analyses conducted for open, TEP, and TAPP procedures. Results Among 402 screened studies, 18 met the inclusion criteria, covering 8,668 open IHR (64.6%) and 4,761 MIS IHR (35.4%) patients. The rate per 100 events for intraoperative complications was 0.19 (95% CI [0.00; 0.76]; I2 = 71%;), 5.22 per 100 for seroma (95% CI [2.86; 9.34]; I2 = 92%), 0.83 per 100 for SSI (95% CI [0.39; 1.75]; I2 = 48%), 3.16 per 100 for hematoma (95% CI [1.16; 8.31]; I2 = 84%), 3.02 per 100 patients for chronic pain (95% CI [2.53; 3.62]; I2 = 13%), and 0.02 per 100 for recurrence (95% CI [0; 0.16]; I2 = 10%). The conversion rate for MIS was 1.66 per 100 (95% CI [0.89; 3.06]; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference between TEP and TAPP in intraoperative complications (p = 0.70), but a lower seroma rate in TAPP compared to TEP (5.29 vs. 20 per 100; P = 0.01). MIS had significant reduction in SSI (0.08 vs. 0.34 per 100; P < 0.01), hematoma (1.29 vs. 17.86; p < 0.01), and recurrence (0.08 vs. 0.37; p = 0.04) compared to open, with no difference in seroma rates. Funnel plots revealed no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions In experienced hands, MIS IHR is a safe and effective option for post-prostatectomy patients, with lower complication rates compared to open IHR, although high-quality comparative studies are needed to establish definitive conclusions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hiatal Hernia After Open versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Oor, J. E.
    Wiezer, M. J.
    Hazebroek, E. J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (08) : 2690 - 2698
  • [22] Hiatal Hernia After Open versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    J. E. Oor
    M. J. Wiezer
    E. J. Hazebroek
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2016, 23 : 2690 - 2698
  • [23] Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is superior to open: a national database review
    B. Pokala
    P. R. Armijo
    L. Flores
    D. Hennings
    D. Oleynikov
    Hernia, 2019, 23 : 593 - 599
  • [24] Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is superior to open: a national database review
    Pokala, B.
    Armijo, P. R.
    Flores, L.
    Hennings, D.
    Oleynikov, D.
    HERNIA, 2019, 23 (03) : 593 - 599
  • [25] The missed diagnosis of femoral hernias in females undergoing inguinal hernia repair - A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis
    Rasador, Ana Caroline Dias
    da Silveira, Carlos Andre Balthazar
    Lech, Gabriele Eckerdt
    de Lima, Bruno Veronez
    Lima, Diego Laurentino
    Malcher, Flavio
    HERNIA, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [26] Diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Maw, Andrew
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 75 : 35 - 43
  • [27] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair
    Sajid, M. S.
    Leaver, C.
    Baig, M. K.
    Sains, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 (01) : 29 - 37
  • [28] Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Chun
    Deng, Shaoping
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (03) : 1164 - 1173
  • [29] Open or laparoscopic mesh repair of incisional hernia in patients that underwent liver transplantation: A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis
    Frountzas, Maximos
    Nikolaou, Christina
    Maris, Spyridon
    Stavrou, Effrosyni
    Giannopoulos, Panagiotis
    Schizas, Dimitrios
    Stergios, Konstantinos
    Toutouzas, Konstantinos
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 34 (12)
  • [30] Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in pediatric age group: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohamed Abdelfattah Elsaedy
    Mohamed Ali Shehata
    Hisham A. Almetaher
    Ibrahim Ali Kabbash
    Sherif Mohamed Shehata
    Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery, 2024, 6 (2) : 55 - 64