Longitudinal history of mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk by familial risk, menopausal status, and initial mammographic density level in a high risk cohort: a nested case-control study

被引:1
|
作者
Tehranifar, Parisa [1 ,2 ]
Argov, Erica J. Lee [1 ]
Athilat, Shweta [1 ]
Liao, Yuyan [1 ]
Wei, Ying [3 ]
White, Alexandra J. [4 ]
O'Brien, Katie M. [4 ]
Sandler, Dale P. [4 ]
Terry, Mary Beth [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 722 West 168th St, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Herbert Irving Comprehens Canc Ctr, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New York, NY USA
[4] Natl Inst Environm Hlth Sci, Epidemiol Branch, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Mammographic breast density; Breast cancer; Mammography; Risk prediction;
D O I
10.1186/s13058-024-01917-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Elevated mammographic density is associated with increased breast cancer risk. However, the contribution of longitudinal changes in mammographic density to breast cancer risk beyond initial mammographic density levels, considering familial breast cancer risk and menopausal status, remains uncertain but holds important clinical implications. Methods In a nested case-control study within the Sister Study (323 cases, 899 controls; 12,095 mammograms), a cohort enriched for family history of breast cancer, we examined case-control status in relation to the largest annual change in percent density and dense area using mammograms available spanning 5.4 years, on average, using multivariable logistic regression and to the rate of mammographic density change using linear mixed-effects models. We considered effect modification by: mammographic density level of the earlier mammogram, the extent of family history, Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation (BOADICEA) risk strata, and menopausal status. Results Cases (diagnosed < 60 years) had greater initial percent density and dense area levels and a slower rate of decline in dense area than controls. Women with stable mammographic density (<= 10% annual change) had an increased breast cancer risk as compared with women whose largest mammographic density change was > 10% annual decline (e.g., Odds Ratio (OR) 2.34, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.63-3.37 for dense area). Increasing vs. decreasing dense area was also associated with elevated risk, especially in women with the highest dense area levels at the earlier mammogram (OR: 2.56, 95%CI 1.50-4.36). Although generally similar across menopausal and familial risk categories, the associations of MD change with risk appeared stronger in pre-menopausal and lower-risk women. Conclusions Women who maintain higher levels of mammographic density (i.e. do not decrease over time) or have increasing mammographic density over time have a higher risk of subsequent breast cancer than women with high mammographic density that decreases over time. These findings suggest potential for incorporating mammographic density trajectories in clinical risk assessment, and the importance of additional breast cancer monitoring in women not experiencing declines in mammographic density over time.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Case-control study of mammographic density and breast cancer risk using processed digital mammograms
    Habel, Laurel A.
    Lipson, Jafi A.
    Achacoso, Ninah
    Rothstein, Joseph H.
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    Liang, Rhea Y.
    Acton, Luana
    McGuire, Valerie
    Whittemore, Alice S.
    Rubin, Daniel L.
    Sieh, Weiva
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 18
  • [32] Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by mode of detection and tumor size: a case-control study
    Krishnan, Kavitha
    Baglietto, Laura
    Apicella, Carmel
    Stone, Jennifer
    Southey, Melissa C.
    English, Dallas R.
    Giles, Graham G.
    Hopper, John L.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 18
  • [33] Risk Analysis of Breast Cancer by Using Bilateral Mammographic Density Differences: A Case-Control Study
    Zhang, Zhang
    Zhang, Xiaoyong
    Chen, Jiaqi
    Takane, Yumi
    Yanagaki, Satoru
    Mori, Naoko
    Ichiji, Kei
    Kato, Katsuaki
    Yanagaki, Mika
    Ebata, Akiko
    Miyashita, Minoru
    Ishida, Takanori
    Homma, Noriyasu
    TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 261 (02): : 139 - 150
  • [34] Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods
    Eng, Amanda
    Gallant, Zoe
    Shepherd, John
    McCormack, Valerie
    Li, Jingmei
    Dowsett, Mitch
    Vinnicombe, Sarah
    Allen, Steve
    dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (05)
  • [35] Mammographic density as risk factor for breast cancer
    Macchetti, Alexandre Henrique
    Cosiski Marana, Heitor Ricardo
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2007, 29 (10): : 493 - 496
  • [36] Mammographic Density as a Marker of Breast Cancer Risk?
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2009, 1 (03) : 175 - 180
  • [37] Mammographic density as a risk factor for breast cancer
    Fulton, Loralee
    Reynolds, Diane
    Flom, Julie
    Terry, MaryBeth
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2008, 35 (03) : 516 - 517
  • [38] Mammographic Density for Personalized Breast Cancer Risk
    Kataoka, Masako
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (02)
  • [39] Mammographic Density Change and Risk of Breast Cancer
    Azam, Shadi
    Eriksson, Mikael
    Sjolander, Arvid
    Hellgren, Roxanna
    Gabrielson, Marike
    Czene, Kamila
    Hall, Per
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2020, 112 (04): : 391 - 399
  • [40] Breast cancer risk and measured mammographic density
    Yaffe, MJ
    Boyd, NF
    Byng, JW
    Jong, RA
    Fishell, E
    Lockwood, GA
    Little, LE
    Tritchler, DL
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 1998, 7 : S47 - S55