Longitudinal history of mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk by familial risk, menopausal status, and initial mammographic density level in a high risk cohort: a nested case-control study

被引:1
|
作者
Tehranifar, Parisa [1 ,2 ]
Argov, Erica J. Lee [1 ]
Athilat, Shweta [1 ]
Liao, Yuyan [1 ]
Wei, Ying [3 ]
White, Alexandra J. [4 ]
O'Brien, Katie M. [4 ]
Sandler, Dale P. [4 ]
Terry, Mary Beth [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 722 West 168th St, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Herbert Irving Comprehens Canc Ctr, Irving Med Ctr, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New York, NY USA
[4] Natl Inst Environm Hlth Sci, Epidemiol Branch, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Mammographic breast density; Breast cancer; Mammography; Risk prediction;
D O I
10.1186/s13058-024-01917-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Elevated mammographic density is associated with increased breast cancer risk. However, the contribution of longitudinal changes in mammographic density to breast cancer risk beyond initial mammographic density levels, considering familial breast cancer risk and menopausal status, remains uncertain but holds important clinical implications. Methods In a nested case-control study within the Sister Study (323 cases, 899 controls; 12,095 mammograms), a cohort enriched for family history of breast cancer, we examined case-control status in relation to the largest annual change in percent density and dense area using mammograms available spanning 5.4 years, on average, using multivariable logistic regression and to the rate of mammographic density change using linear mixed-effects models. We considered effect modification by: mammographic density level of the earlier mammogram, the extent of family history, Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation (BOADICEA) risk strata, and menopausal status. Results Cases (diagnosed < 60 years) had greater initial percent density and dense area levels and a slower rate of decline in dense area than controls. Women with stable mammographic density (<= 10% annual change) had an increased breast cancer risk as compared with women whose largest mammographic density change was > 10% annual decline (e.g., Odds Ratio (OR) 2.34, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.63-3.37 for dense area). Increasing vs. decreasing dense area was also associated with elevated risk, especially in women with the highest dense area levels at the earlier mammogram (OR: 2.56, 95%CI 1.50-4.36). Although generally similar across menopausal and familial risk categories, the associations of MD change with risk appeared stronger in pre-menopausal and lower-risk women. Conclusions Women who maintain higher levels of mammographic density (i.e. do not decrease over time) or have increasing mammographic density over time have a higher risk of subsequent breast cancer than women with high mammographic density that decreases over time. These findings suggest potential for incorporating mammographic density trajectories in clinical risk assessment, and the importance of additional breast cancer monitoring in women not experiencing declines in mammographic density over time.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Tamoxifen-Induced Reduction in Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk Reduction: A Nested Case-Control Study
    Cuzick, Jack
    Warwick, Jane
    Pinney, Elizabeth
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    Cawthorn, Simon
    Howell, Anthony
    Forbes, John F.
    Warren, Ruth M. L.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (09) : 744 - 752
  • [22] Family History, Mammographic Density, and Risk of Breast Cancer
    Martin, Lisa J.
    Melnichouk, Olga
    Guo, Helen
    Chiarelli, Anna M.
    Hislop, T. Gregory
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    Minkin, Salomon
    Hopper, John L.
    Boyd, Norman F.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (02) : 456 - 463
  • [23] Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction
    Celine M Vachon
    Carla H van Gils
    Thomas A Sellers
    Karthik Ghosh
    Sandhya Pruthi
    Kathleen R Brandt
    V Shane Pankratz
    Breast Cancer Research, 9
  • [24] Longitudinal Study of Mammographic Density Measures That Predict Breast Cancer Risk
    Krishnan, Kavitha
    Baglietto, Laura
    Stone, Jennifer
    Simpson, Julie A.
    Severi, Gianluca
    Evans, Christopher F.
    MacInnis, Robert J.
    Giles, Graham G.
    Apicella, Carmel
    Hopper, John L.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2017, 26 (04) : 651 - 660
  • [25] Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction
    Vachon, Celine M.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    Sellers, Thomas A.
    Ghosh, Karthik
    Pruthi, Sandhya
    Brandt, Kathleen R.
    Pankratz, V. Shane
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (06)
  • [26] Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Pankratz, V. Shane
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Maloney, Shaun D.
    Ghosh, Karthik
    Brandt, Kathleen R.
    Milanese, Tia
    Carston, Michael J.
    Sellers, Thomas A.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2007, 16 (05) : 921 - 928
  • [27] Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by mode of detection and tumor size: a case-control study
    Kavitha Krishnan
    Laura Baglietto
    Carmel Apicella
    Jennifer Stone
    Melissa C. Southey
    Dallas R. English
    Graham G. Giles
    John L. Hopper
    Breast Cancer Research, 18
  • [28] Case-control study of mammographic density and breast cancer risk using processed digital mammograms
    Laurel A. Habel
    Jafi A. Lipson
    Ninah Achacoso
    Joseph H. Rothstein
    Martin J. Yaffe
    Rhea Y. Liang
    Luana Acton
    Valerie McGuire
    Alice S. Whittemore
    Daniel L. Rubin
    Weiva Sieh
    Breast Cancer Research, 18
  • [29] Relationship between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women: A case-control study
    Nagao Y.
    Kawaguchi Y.
    Sugiyama Y.
    Saji S.
    Kashiki Y.
    Breast Cancer, 2003, 10 (3) : 228 - 233
  • [30] Menopausal hormone therapies: Their effect on mammographic density and breast cancer risk
    Santen, R
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2005, 21 : 12 - 16