Deep learning-based evaluation of panoramic radiographs for osteoporosis screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Tarighatnia, Ali [1 ]
Amanzadeh, Masoud [2 ]
Hamedan, Mahnaz [2 ]
Mohammadnia, Alireza [2 ]
Nader, Nader D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ardabil Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, Ardebil, Iran
[2] Ardabil Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Informat Management, Ardebil, Iran
[3] Univ Buffalo, Jacobs Sch Med & Biomed Sci, Dept Anesthesiol, Buffalo, NY USA
来源
BMC MEDICAL IMAGING | 2025年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
Osteoporosis; Panoramic radiography; Deep learning; OPG; Diagnosis; EXTERNAL VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-025-01626-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundOsteoporosis is a complex condition that drives research into its causes, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, significantly affecting patients and healthcare providers in various aspects of life. Research is exploring orthopantomogram (OPG) radiography for osteoporosis screening instead of bone mineral density (BMD) assessments. Although this method uses various indicators, manual analysis can be challenging. Machine learning and deep learning techniques have been developed to address this. This systematic review and meta-analysis is the first to evaluate the accuracy of deep learning models in predicting osteoporosis from OPG radiographs, providing evidence for their performance and clinical use.MethodsA literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science up to February 10, 2025, using the keywords related to deep learning, osteoporosis, and panoramic radiography. We conducted title, abstract, and full-text screening based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using a bivariate random-effects model to pool diagnostic accuracy measures, and subgroup analyses explored sources of heterogeneity.ResultsWe found 204 articles, removed 189 duplicates and irrelevant studies, assessed 15articles, and ultimately, seven studies were selected. The DL models showed AUC values of 66.8-99.8%, with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 59 to 97% and 64.9-100%, respectively. No significant differences in diagnostic accuracy were found among subgroups. AlexNet had the highest performance, achieving a sensitivity of 0.89 and a specificity of 0.99. Sensitivity analysis revealed that excluding outliers had little impact on the results. Deeks' funnel plot indicated no significant publication bias (P = 0.54).ConclusionsThis systematic review indicates that deep learning models for osteoporosis diagnosis achieved 80% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 93% AUC. Models like AlexNet and ResNet demonstrate effectiveness. These findings suggest that DL models are promising for noninvasive early detection, but more extensive multicenter studies are necessary to validate their efficacy in at-risk groups.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deep learning versus ophthalmologists for screening for glaucoma on fundus examination: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buisson, Mathieu
    Navel, Valentin
    Labbe, Antoine
    Watson, Stephanie L.
    Baker, Julien S.
    Murtagh, Patrick
    Chiambaretta, Frederic
    Dutheil, Frederic
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 49 (09): : 1027 - 1038
  • [22] Deep learning for pneumothorax diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sugibayashi, Takahiro
    Walston, Shannon L.
    Matsumoto, Toshimasa
    Mitsuyama, Yasuhito
    Miki, Yukio
    Ueda, Daiju
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2023, 32 (168):
  • [23] Deep learning-based computer-aided detection of ultrasound in breast cancer diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, H.
    Zhao, J.
    Jiang, Z.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 79 (11) : e1403 - e1413
  • [24] Performance of Radiomics-based machine learning and deep learning-based methods in the prediction of tumor grade in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tavanaei, Roozbeh
    Akhlaghpasand, Mohammadhosein
    Alikhani, Alireza
    Hajikarimloo, Bardia
    Ansari, Ali
    Yong, Raymund L.
    Margetis, Konstantinos
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2025, 48 (01)
  • [25] A systematic approach to deep learning-based nodule detection in chest radiographs
    Behrendt, Finn
    Bengs, Marcel
    Bhattacharya, Debayan
    Krueger, Julia
    Opfer, Roland
    Schlaefer, Alexander
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [26] A systematic approach to deep learning-based nodule detection in chest radiographs
    Finn Behrendt
    Marcel Bengs
    Debayan Bhattacharya
    Julia Krüger
    Roland Opfer
    Alexander Schlaefer
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [27] Artificial intelligence for osteoporosis detection on panoramic radiography: A systematic review and meta analysis
    Ghasemi, Nikoo
    Rokhshad, Rata
    Zare, Qonche
    Shobeiri, Parnian
    Schwendicke, Falk
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2025, 156
  • [28] A Novel Deep Learning-Based Approach for Segmentation of Different Type Caries Lesions on Panoramic Radiographs
    Dayi, Burak
    Uzen, Huseyin
    Cicek, Ipek Balikci
    Duman, Suayip Burak
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (02)
  • [29] Deep learning performance compared to healthcare experts in detecting wrist fractures from radiographs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hansen, V.
    Jensen, J.
    Kusk, M. W.
    Gerke, O.
    Tromborg, H. B.
    Lysdahlgaard, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 174
  • [30] Automated Caries Screening Using Ensemble Deep Learning on Panoramic Radiographs
    Bui, Toan Huy
    Hamamoto, Kazuhiko
    Paing, May Phu
    ENTROPY, 2022, 24 (10)