Biparametric MRI-based radiomics for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer of PI-RADS category 3 lesions

被引:0
|
作者
Lu, Feng [1 ,3 ]
Zhao, Yanjun [1 ]
Wang, Zhongjuan [1 ]
Feng, Ninghan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangnan Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangnan Univ, Wuxi Sch Med, Wuxi, Peoples R China
关键词
BpMRI; Prostate cancer; PI-RADS; Radiomics; Diagnostic performance; CURVES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-025-14022-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI)-based radiomics in differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) among lesions categorized as Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score 3. Method: Between September 2020 and October 2023, a total of 233 patients with PI-RADS category 3 lesions were identified, which were divided into training cohort (n = 160) and validation cohort (n = 73). Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging (T2) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for csPCa prediction. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm was used to select the most useful radiomics features. Diagnostic performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results: 34 robust radiomics features (incorporating 12 features from T2 and 22 features from DWI) were selected to construct the final radiomics signature. In the training group, the AUCs for prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), radiomics, and combination were 0.658 (95% CI 0.550-0.766), 0.858 (95% CI 0.779-0.936), and 0.887 (95% CI 0.814-0.959), respectively, in the validation group were 0.690 (95% CI 0.524-0.855), 0.810 (95% CI 0.682-0.937), and 0.856 (95% CI 0.750-0.962). The combination model integrating radiomics and PSAD showed a significant improvement in diagnostic performance as compared to using these two parameters alone either in the training group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.024) or in the validation group (P = 0.024 and P = 0.048). Conclusion: BpMRI-based radiomics had high diagnostic performance in predicting csPCa among PI-RADS 3 lesions, and combining it with PSAD could further improve the overall accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PI-RADS: multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer
    Aileen O’Shea
    Mukesh Harisinghani
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2022, 35 : 523 - 532
  • [42] PI-RADS: multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer
    O'Shea, Aileen
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (04) : 523 - 532
  • [43] The Role of Radiomics in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 Era: A Systematic Review
    Antolin, Andreu
    Roson, Nuria
    Mast, Richard
    Arce, Javier
    Almodovar, Ramon
    Cortada, Roger
    Maceda, Almudena
    Escobar, Manuel
    Trilla, Enrique
    Morote, Juan
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [44] Comparison of Likert and PI-RADS version 2 MRI scoring systems for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Zawaideh, Jeries P.
    Sala, Evis
    Pantelidou, Maria
    Shaida, Nadeem
    Koo, Brendan
    Caglic, Iztok
    Warren, Anne Y.
    Carmisciano, Luca
    Saeb-Parsy, Kasra
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
    Kastner, Christof
    Barrett, Tristan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1112):
  • [45] Clinical and Radiological Factors for Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Patients With PI-RADS 3 Lesions
    Zhang, Zhiyu
    Hu, Can
    Lin, Yuxin
    Song, Ouyang
    Gong, Dongkui
    Zhang, Xuefeng
    Wang, Nan
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2024, 23
  • [46] Contribution of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion MRI to PI-RADS for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Tavakoli, Anoshirwan Andrej
    Hielscher, Thomas
    Badura, Patrick
    Goertz, Magdalena
    Kuder, Tristan Anselm
    Gnirs, Regula
    Schwab, Constantin
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Bonekamp, David
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (01) : 186 - 199
  • [47] MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS FOR DETECTING CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN WITH PI-RADS 3 LESIONS
    Fang, Andrew
    Shumaker, Luke
    Khajir, Ghazal
    Fan, Richard
    Soodana-Prakash, Nachiketh
    Patel, Hiten
    Sprenkle, Preston
    Sonn, Geoffrey
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Gupta, Gopal
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E78 - E78
  • [48] PI-RADS Guided Discovery Radiomics for Characterization of Prostate Lesions with Diffusion-Weighted MRI
    Khalvati, Farzad
    Zhang, Yucheng
    Le, Phuong H. U.
    Gujrathi, Isha
    Haider, Masoom A.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2019, 10950
  • [49] Assessment of PI-RADS v2 categories ≥ 3 for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Nayana U. Patel
    Kimberly E. Lind
    Kavita Garg
    David Crawford
    Priya N. Werahera
    Sajal S. Pokharel
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 705 - 712
  • [50] Is possible to rule out clinically significant prostate cancer using PI-RADS v2 for the assessment of prostate MRI?
    Cavacalla Viana, Publio Cesar
    Horvat, Natally
    dos Santos Junior, Vatter Ribeiro
    Lima, Thais Carneiro
    Romao, Davi dos Santos
    de Oliveira Cerri, Luciana Mendes
    de Castro, Marilia Germanos
    Vargas, Herbert Alberto
    Miranda, JOlia Azevedo
    Leite, Claudia da Costa
    Cerri, Giovanni Guido
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2019, 45 (04): : 724 - 731