Biparametric MRI-based radiomics for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer of PI-RADS category 3 lesions

被引:0
|
作者
Lu, Feng [1 ,3 ]
Zhao, Yanjun [1 ]
Wang, Zhongjuan [1 ]
Feng, Ninghan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangnan Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Wuxi, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangnan Univ, Wuxi Sch Med, Wuxi, Peoples R China
关键词
BpMRI; Prostate cancer; PI-RADS; Radiomics; Diagnostic performance; CURVES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-025-14022-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI)-based radiomics in differentiating clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) among lesions categorized as Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score 3. Method: Between September 2020 and October 2023, a total of 233 patients with PI-RADS category 3 lesions were identified, which were divided into training cohort (n = 160) and validation cohort (n = 73). Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging (T2) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for csPCa prediction. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm was used to select the most useful radiomics features. Diagnostic performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results: 34 robust radiomics features (incorporating 12 features from T2 and 22 features from DWI) were selected to construct the final radiomics signature. In the training group, the AUCs for prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), radiomics, and combination were 0.658 (95% CI 0.550-0.766), 0.858 (95% CI 0.779-0.936), and 0.887 (95% CI 0.814-0.959), respectively, in the validation group were 0.690 (95% CI 0.524-0.855), 0.810 (95% CI 0.682-0.937), and 0.856 (95% CI 0.750-0.962). The combination model integrating radiomics and PSAD showed a significant improvement in diagnostic performance as compared to using these two parameters alone either in the training group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.024) or in the validation group (P = 0.024 and P = 0.048). Conclusion: BpMRI-based radiomics had high diagnostic performance in predicting csPCa among PI-RADS 3 lesions, and combining it with PSAD could further improve the overall accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A PI-RADS STRATIFIED RISK CALCULATOR FOR PREDICTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER AT BIOPSY
    Andreas, Darian
    Nethala, Daniel
    Pandya, Shashank
    Alaiev, Daniel
    Samadder, Aishe
    Lee, Jeffrey
    Martinez, Mariela
    Hall, Simon
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E1007 - E1007
  • [22] Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS 3 Lesions Using T2w-Derived Radiomics Feature Maps in 3T Prostate MRI
    Jensen, Laura J.
    Kim, Damon
    Elgeti, Thomas
    Steffen, Ingo G.
    Schaafs, Lars-Arne
    Haas, Matthias
    Kurz, Lukas J.
    Hamm, Bernd
    Nagel, Sebastian N.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (11) : 6814 - 6828
  • [24] PI-RADS upgrading as the strongest predictor for the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with initial PI-RADS-3 lesions
    Kwe, Jeremy
    Baunacke, Martin
    Boehm, Katharina
    Platzek, Ivan
    Thomas, Christian
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [25] Variation in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Fusion Biopsy of PI-RADS 3-5 Lesions Based on Ethnicity
    Edelblute, Beth
    Aly, Ahmed
    Jing, Zhe
    Wasaymahmood, Abdul
    Watts, Kara
    Sankin, Alex
    Maria, Pedro
    Guru, Khurshid
    Aboumohamed, Ahmed
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2025, 19 (01)
  • [26] Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy: MRI-based Risk Models versus a PI-RADS and PSA Density Strategy for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Deniffel, Dominik
    Healy, Gerard M.
    Dong, Xin
    Ghai, Sangeet
    Salinas-Miranda, Emmanuel
    Fleshner, Neil
    Hamilton, Robert
    Kulkarni, Girish
    Toi, Ants
    van der Kwast, Theodorus
    Zlotta, Alexandre
    Finelli, Antonio
    Perlis, Nathan
    Haider, Masoom A.
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 300 (02) : 369 - 379
  • [27] DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION, AND COMPARED PERFORMANCE OF A PI-RADS V2.1 MRI-BASED PREDICTIVE MODEL FOR CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER
    David, G. Gelikman
    William, S. Azar
    Enis, C. Yilmaz
    Yue, Lin
    Luke, A. Shumaker
    Andrew, M. Fang
    Stephanie, A. Harmon
    Erich, P. Huang
    Sahil, H. Parikh
    Jason, A. Hyman
    Kyle, C. Schuppe
    Jeffrey, W. Nix
    Samuel, J. Galgano
    Peter, L. Choyke
    Sandeep, Gurram
    Bradford, J. Wood
    Soroush, Rais-Bahrami
    Peter, A. Pinto
    Baris, Turkbey
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2025, 43 (03)
  • [28] Radiomics prediction model for the improved diagnosis o clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI
    Li, Mengjuan
    Chen, Tong
    Zhao, Wenlu
    Wei, Chaogang
    Li, Xiaobo
    Duan, Shaofeng
    Ji, Libiao
    Lu, Zhihua
    Shen, Junkang
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 10 (02) : 368 - +
  • [29] Impact of PI-RADS Category 3 lesions on the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting prostate cancer and the prevalence of prostate cancer within each PI-RADS category: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wadera, Akshay
    Alabousi, Mostafa
    Pozdnyakov, Alex
    Al-Ghita, Mohammed Kashif
    Jafri, Ali
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Schieda, Nicola
    van der Pol, Christian B.
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Samoilov, Lucy
    Gusenbauer, Kaela
    Alabousi, Abdullah
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 94 (1118):
  • [30] Negative MRI rules out clinically significant prostate cancer regardless of PI-RADS era
    Shadbahr, T.
    Pylvalainen, J.
    Hoffstrom, J.
    Kenttamies, A.
    Mirtti, T.
    Laajala, T. D.
    Rannikko, A. S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S464 - S466