Comparison of serious adverse effects of methylphenidate, atomoxetine and amphetamine in the treatment of ADHD: an adverse event analysis based on the FAERS database

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Linman [1 ]
Zhao, Dan [1 ]
Lan, Yongqing [1 ]
Jin, Liuyin [2 ]
Yang, Lijuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchong Mental Hlth Ctr Sichuan Prov, Nanchong, Peoples R China
[2] Second Peoples Hosp Lishui, Lishui, Peoples R China
来源
BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY | 2025年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Methylphenidate; Atomoxetine; Amphetamine; FAERS; Adverse events; ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; STIMULANT MEDICATIONS; METHAMPHETAMINE USE; DRUG; CHILDREN; DISPROPORTIONALITY; ADOLESCENTS; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1186/s40360-025-00868-5
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BackgroundMethylphenidate, atomoxetine, and amphetamine are the most commonly prescribed medications for ADHD, approved by the FDA. Despite their widespread use, real-world studies on their serious adverse effects are limited. This study leverages the FAERS database to analyze the safety of these drugs.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using FAERS data from 2004 to 2023. Adverse event (AE) signals for methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and amphetamine were identified by calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs), proportional reporting ratios (PRRs), information components (ICs), and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM).ResultsThe analysis included 72,298 reports, with 37,471 linked to methylphenidate, 17,335 to atomoxetine, and 17,492 to amphetamine. Significant AE signals were found, especially in psychotic disorders for methylphenidate (ROR = 4.47, PRR = 3.7) and amphetamines (ROR = 4.06, PRR = 3.43), and psychiatric and reproductive disorders for atomoxetine (ROR = 5.44, PRR = 4.29; ROR = 2.49, PRR = 2.46). At the PT level, the most common adverse safety signals for the three ADHD drugs were Application site erythema, Somnolence, and Headache. Further analysis showed that "Aggression", "Mydriasis", "Trichotillomania" and suicide-related adverse reactions showed strong signals in the three ADHD drugs. However, there are also differences between the three ADHD medications. For example, serious adverse effects related to cardiovascular and neurological effects were stronger in amphetamines, with the "coronary artery dissection" and "carotid artery dissection" signals being the most significant; "Precocious puberty" has a stronger signal in methylphenidate, and the signal associated with elevated liver enzymes is strongest in atomoxetine. In addition, we also found some PTs that were not included in the drug label, such as "Disturbance in social behaviour" and "Trichotillomania".ConclusionsIn this study, pharmacovigilance analysis of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and amphetamine was performed using the FAERS database, and we identified significant safety signals. Of note, three ADHD medications are associated with suicide-related signals, amphetamine associated with coronary artery dissection, methylphenidate associated with precocious puberty, and atomoxetine associated with testicle, penile lesions, and liver damage, which require special attention. This study provides a reference for the clinical personalized medication of ADHD patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Novel Adverse Events of Iloperidone: A Disproportionality Analysis in US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database
    Subeesh, Viswam
    Maheswari, Eswaran
    Singh, Hemendra
    Beulah, Thomas Elsa
    Swaroop, Ann Mary
    CURRENT DRUG SAFETY, 2019, 14 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [42] Safety assessment of tolvaptan: real-world adverse event analysis using the FAERS database
    Cao, Peiyang
    Wang, Qian
    Wang, Yan
    Qiao, Qing
    Yan, Liyuan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 15
  • [43] Safety assessment of Yasmin: Real-world adverse event analysis using the FAERS database
    Xu, Wenting
    Zhu, Lili
    Wang, Jiahui
    Shi, Lingli
    Tang, Xiuqin
    Chen, Qingli
    Wang, Lihong
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 301 : 12 - 18
  • [44] Pharmacovigilance of triazole antifungal agents: Analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database
    Zhou, Jianxing
    Wei, Zipeng
    Xu, Baohua
    Liu, Maobai
    Xu, Ruichao
    Wu, Xuemei
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [45] Safety assessment of proteasome inhibitors real world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database
    Huang, Jinlong
    Zhang, Miaomiao
    Lin, Jingyang
    Yang, Xiuli
    Huang, Ping
    Zheng, Xiaochun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [46] A DISPROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS OF THE SERIOUS ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS ASSOCIATED WITH GENE THERAPY PRODUCTS USING THE FDA ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING SYSTEM (FAERS)
    Ghanem, B.
    Fleming, M.
    Brown, L. M.
    Rodriguez-Monguio, R.
    Seoane-Vazquez, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S237 - S237
  • [47] Safety assessment of Brexpiprazole: Real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database
    Jiang, Ying
    Zhou, Lingyun
    Shen, Yuan
    Zhou, Qin
    Ji, Yingying
    Zhu, Haohao
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2024, 346 : 223 - 229
  • [48] Safety assessment of deutetrabenazine: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database
    Shu, Yanping
    Wang, Yuanhe
    Liu, Jiaoying
    Hu, Lingyan
    Tong, Sichao
    Wu, Gang
    Zhu, Xianlin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [49] Safety assessment of tafamidis: a real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database
    Chen, Min
    Huang, Yaping
    Ke, Chengjie
    Chen, Maohua
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2024,
  • [50] Neratinib safety evaluation: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database
    Fan, Yunhe
    Wu, Teng
    Xu, Pengyang
    Yang, Chuanli
    An, Jie
    Zhang, Haijia
    Abbas, Mureed
    Dong, Xiushan
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15