Comparison of serious adverse effects of methylphenidate, atomoxetine and amphetamine in the treatment of ADHD: an adverse event analysis based on the FAERS database

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Linman [1 ]
Zhao, Dan [1 ]
Lan, Yongqing [1 ]
Jin, Liuyin [2 ]
Yang, Lijuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchong Mental Hlth Ctr Sichuan Prov, Nanchong, Peoples R China
[2] Second Peoples Hosp Lishui, Lishui, Peoples R China
来源
BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY | 2025年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Methylphenidate; Atomoxetine; Amphetamine; FAERS; Adverse events; ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; STIMULANT MEDICATIONS; METHAMPHETAMINE USE; DRUG; CHILDREN; DISPROPORTIONALITY; ADOLESCENTS; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1186/s40360-025-00868-5
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BackgroundMethylphenidate, atomoxetine, and amphetamine are the most commonly prescribed medications for ADHD, approved by the FDA. Despite their widespread use, real-world studies on their serious adverse effects are limited. This study leverages the FAERS database to analyze the safety of these drugs.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using FAERS data from 2004 to 2023. Adverse event (AE) signals for methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and amphetamine were identified by calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs), proportional reporting ratios (PRRs), information components (ICs), and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM).ResultsThe analysis included 72,298 reports, with 37,471 linked to methylphenidate, 17,335 to atomoxetine, and 17,492 to amphetamine. Significant AE signals were found, especially in psychotic disorders for methylphenidate (ROR = 4.47, PRR = 3.7) and amphetamines (ROR = 4.06, PRR = 3.43), and psychiatric and reproductive disorders for atomoxetine (ROR = 5.44, PRR = 4.29; ROR = 2.49, PRR = 2.46). At the PT level, the most common adverse safety signals for the three ADHD drugs were Application site erythema, Somnolence, and Headache. Further analysis showed that "Aggression", "Mydriasis", "Trichotillomania" and suicide-related adverse reactions showed strong signals in the three ADHD drugs. However, there are also differences between the three ADHD medications. For example, serious adverse effects related to cardiovascular and neurological effects were stronger in amphetamines, with the "coronary artery dissection" and "carotid artery dissection" signals being the most significant; "Precocious puberty" has a stronger signal in methylphenidate, and the signal associated with elevated liver enzymes is strongest in atomoxetine. In addition, we also found some PTs that were not included in the drug label, such as "Disturbance in social behaviour" and "Trichotillomania".ConclusionsIn this study, pharmacovigilance analysis of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and amphetamine was performed using the FAERS database, and we identified significant safety signals. Of note, three ADHD medications are associated with suicide-related signals, amphetamine associated with coronary artery dissection, methylphenidate associated with precocious puberty, and atomoxetine associated with testicle, penile lesions, and liver damage, which require special attention. This study provides a reference for the clinical personalized medication of ADHD patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Serious Adverse Event Profiles Among Antirheumatic Agents Using Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database
    Matsuoka, Yomei
    Narukawa, Mamoru
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2018, 52 (03) : 339 - 347
  • [22] Gastroparesis treatment options metoclopramide and prucalopride: analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database
    Andrews, Michael B.
    Adler, Douglas G.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 18 (07) : 389 - 395
  • [23] Instrumental Variable Analysis of ADHD Treatment and Serious Adverse Events
    Dormuth, Colin R.
    Brookhart, M. Alan
    Miller, Tarita A.
    Morrow, Richard L.
    Platt, Robert W.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 : 379 - 379
  • [24] Comprehensive understanding of the adverse effects associated with temozolomide: a disproportionate analysis based on the FAERS database
    Zhou, Yusen
    Jia, Peng
    Fang, Yuting
    Zhu, Wei
    Gong, Yong
    Fan, Tianyu
    Yin, Jiangliu
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [25] SERIOUS ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS REPORTED TO THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA): ANALYSIS OF THE FDA ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING SYSTEM (FAERS) 2006-2011 DATABASE
    Sonawane, K. B.
    Hansen, R. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A86 - A86
  • [26] Mining and analysis of adverse event signals of Cariprazine based on the real-world data of FAERS database
    Zhu, Haohao
    Qu, Yucai
    Du, Zhiqiang
    Zhou, Qin
    Shen, Yuan
    Jiang, Ying
    Zhou, Zhenhe
    Zhou, Hongliang
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2024, 347 : 45 - 50
  • [27] Severe cutaneous adverse reactions associated with antifungal agents: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database
    Shan, Huifang
    Wei, Chunyan
    Zhang, Jingyi
    Wu, Bin
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2025,
  • [28] Medications and the risk of perforated appendicitis: an adverse event report system (FAERS) database analysis
    Ramai, Daryl
    Mozell, Daniel
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Kewalramani, Anjali
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Dhindsa, Banreet
    Dhaliwal, Amaninder
    Khan, Shahab
    Adler, Douglas G.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 16 (10) : 1011 - 1017
  • [29] Adverse event profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitors: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database
    Tian, Xiaojiang
    Chen, Lin
    Chen, Yonghong
    Zhang, Ni
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2025,
  • [30] A pharmacovigilance study of adverse event profiles and haemorrhagic safety of bevacizumab based on the FAERS database
    Tang, Linlin
    Ding, Chuanhua
    Li, Hongying
    Yin, Guoqiang
    Zhang, Haixia
    Liu, Wen Shan
    Ji, Yinghui
    Li, Hui
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2023, : 213 - 220