Comparison of serious adverse effects of methylphenidate, atomoxetine and amphetamine in the treatment of ADHD: an adverse event analysis based on the FAERS database

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Linman [1 ]
Zhao, Dan [1 ]
Lan, Yongqing [1 ]
Jin, Liuyin [2 ]
Yang, Lijuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchong Mental Hlth Ctr Sichuan Prov, Nanchong, Peoples R China
[2] Second Peoples Hosp Lishui, Lishui, Peoples R China
来源
BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY | 2025年 / 26卷 / 01期
关键词
Methylphenidate; Atomoxetine; Amphetamine; FAERS; Adverse events; ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; STIMULANT MEDICATIONS; METHAMPHETAMINE USE; DRUG; CHILDREN; DISPROPORTIONALITY; ADOLESCENTS; PREVALENCE; DIAGNOSIS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1186/s40360-025-00868-5
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BackgroundMethylphenidate, atomoxetine, and amphetamine are the most commonly prescribed medications for ADHD, approved by the FDA. Despite their widespread use, real-world studies on their serious adverse effects are limited. This study leverages the FAERS database to analyze the safety of these drugs.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using FAERS data from 2004 to 2023. Adverse event (AE) signals for methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and amphetamine were identified by calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs), proportional reporting ratios (PRRs), information components (ICs), and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM).ResultsThe analysis included 72,298 reports, with 37,471 linked to methylphenidate, 17,335 to atomoxetine, and 17,492 to amphetamine. Significant AE signals were found, especially in psychotic disorders for methylphenidate (ROR = 4.47, PRR = 3.7) and amphetamines (ROR = 4.06, PRR = 3.43), and psychiatric and reproductive disorders for atomoxetine (ROR = 5.44, PRR = 4.29; ROR = 2.49, PRR = 2.46). At the PT level, the most common adverse safety signals for the three ADHD drugs were Application site erythema, Somnolence, and Headache. Further analysis showed that "Aggression", "Mydriasis", "Trichotillomania" and suicide-related adverse reactions showed strong signals in the three ADHD drugs. However, there are also differences between the three ADHD medications. For example, serious adverse effects related to cardiovascular and neurological effects were stronger in amphetamines, with the "coronary artery dissection" and "carotid artery dissection" signals being the most significant; "Precocious puberty" has a stronger signal in methylphenidate, and the signal associated with elevated liver enzymes is strongest in atomoxetine. In addition, we also found some PTs that were not included in the drug label, such as "Disturbance in social behaviour" and "Trichotillomania".ConclusionsIn this study, pharmacovigilance analysis of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and amphetamine was performed using the FAERS database, and we identified significant safety signals. Of note, three ADHD medications are associated with suicide-related signals, amphetamine associated with coronary artery dissection, methylphenidate associated with precocious puberty, and atomoxetine associated with testicle, penile lesions, and liver damage, which require special attention. This study provides a reference for the clinical personalized medication of ADHD patients.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adverse event signal mining and serious adverse event influencing factor analysis of fulvestrant based on FAERS database
    Yin, Guisen
    Song, Guiling
    Xue, Shuyi
    Liu, Fen
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [2] Mining and analysis of adverse event signals of vandetanib based on the FAERS database
    Zhou, Ying
    Li, Na
    Ma, Guowei
    Su, Ning
    Liu, Jiang
    Yue, Wenxi
    Yin, Rui
    Chen, Jie
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2024,
  • [3] Adverse event signal mining and severe adverse event influencing factor analysis of Lumateperone based on FAERS database
    Zhang, Yanjing
    Zhou, Chunhua
    Liu, Yan
    Hao, Yupei
    Wang, Jing
    Song, Bingyu
    Yu, Jing
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [4] Pharmacovigilance analysis of orlistat adverse events based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database
    Zhu, Jinfeng
    Hu, Mianda
    Liang, Yingshi
    Zhong, Mingjun
    Chen, Zilin
    Wang, Zhenjie
    Yang, Yujia
    Luo, Ziyi
    Zeng, Wenqi
    Li, Jiahui
    Du, Yikuan
    Liu, Yi
    Yang, Chun
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (14)
  • [5] Propofol-associated serious adverse events: an analysis of the FAERS database
    Xuan, Guocheng
    Zhang, Yi
    Cui, Jinhua
    Zhou, Jing
    Sui, Cheng
    BIOTECHNOLOGY AND GENETIC ENGINEERING REVIEWS, 2024, 40 (03) : 2874 - 2887
  • [6] Adverse event reporting of faricimab: a disproportionality analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database
    He, Chang-Zhu
    Qiu, Qin
    Lu, Song-Jie
    Xue, Fu-Li
    Liu, Jun-Qiao
    He, Yu
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 16
  • [7] Adverse Event Assessment of Upadacitinib: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the FAERS Database
    Yuan, Jiayu
    Lu, Hongxia
    Zuo, Xulei
    Yin, Lihong
    Pu, Yuepu
    Zhang, Juan
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2024, 33 (10)
  • [8] Mining and evaluation of adverse event signals for capmatinib based on the FAERS database
    Chen, Xinnan
    Jiang, Ying
    Zhu, Haohao
    Tian, Man
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [9] Exploration and evaluation of adverse event signals of droxidopa based on the FAERS database
    Chen, Xinnan
    Zhu, Haohao
    Jiang, Ying
    Tian, Man
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2025,
  • [10] Safety profiles of methylphenidate, amphetamine, and atomoxetine: analysis of spontaneous reports submitted to the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system
    Wei, Wei
    Chen, Li
    Zhou, Hui
    Liu, Jinfeng
    Zhang, Yue
    Feng, Shiyu
    Bai, Yingtao
    Leng, Yanen
    Chang, En
    Huang, Liang
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14