Observation Definitions and Their Implications in Machine Learning-Based Predictions of Excessive Rainfall

被引:0
|
作者
Hill, Aaron J. [1 ,2 ]
Schumacher, Russ S. [1 ]
Green, Mitchell L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Meteorol, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[3] Cent Michigan Univ, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, Mt Pleasant, MI USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Precipitation; Numerical weather prediction/forecasting; Operational forecasting; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; QUANTITATIVE PRECIPITATION FORECASTS; FLASH; WEATHER; TUTORIAL;
D O I
10.1175/WAF-D-24-0033.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The implications of definitions fi nitions of excessive rainfall observations on machine learning model forecast skill are assessed using the Colorado State University Machine Learning Probabilities (CSU-MLP) forecast system. The CSU-MLP uses historical observations along with reforecasts from a global ensemble to train random forests to probabilis- tically predict excessive rainfall events. Here, random forest models are trained using two distinct rainfall datasets, one that is composed of fi xed-frequency (FF) average recurrence intervals exceedances , fl ash fl ood reports and the other a com- pilation of fl ooding and rainfall proxies [Unified fi ed Flood Verification fi cation System (UFVS)]. Both models generate 1-3-day fore- casts and are evaluated against a climatological baseline to characterize their overall skill as a function of lead time, season , region. Model comparisons suggest that regional frequencies in excessive rainfall observations contribute to when and where the ML models issue forecasts and subsequently their skill and reliability. Additionally, the spatiotemporal distribu- tion of observations has implications for ML model training requirements, notably, how long of an observational record is needed to obtain skillful forecasts. Experiments reveal that shorter-trained UFVS-based models can be as skillful as longer-trained FF-based models. In essence, the UFVS dataset exhibits a more robust characterization of excessive rainfall and impacts, and machine learning models trained on more representative datasets of meteorological hazards may not re- quire as extensive training to generate skillful forecasts.
引用
收藏
页码:1733 / 1750
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine learning-based predictions of buckling behaviour of cold-formed steel structural elements
    Mojtabaei, Seyed Mohammad
    Becque, Jurgen
    Khandan, Rasoul
    Hajirasouliha, Iman
    ce/papers, 2023, 6 (3-4) : 843 - 847
  • [42] Forecasting of Debris Flow Using Machine Learning-Based Adjusted Rainfall Information and RAMMS Model
    Oh, Cheong-Hyeon
    Choo, Kyung-Su
    Go, Chul-Min
    Choi, Jung-Ryel
    Kim, Byung-Sik
    WATER, 2021, 13 (17)
  • [43] Comparisons of Different Machine Learning-Based Rainfall-Runoff Simulations under Changing Environments
    Li, Chenliang
    Jiao, Ying
    Kan, Guangyuan
    Fu, Xiaodi
    Chai, Fuxin
    Yu, Haijun
    Liang, Ke
    WATER, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [44] A Machine Learning-based Approach to Pseudo-Radar Rainfall Estimation Using Disdrometer Data
    Chen, Haonan
    Chandrasekar, V.
    2018 2ND URSI ATLANTIC RADIO SCIENCE MEETING (AT-RASC), 2018,
  • [45] Machine Learning-Based Rainfall Forecasting with Multiple Non-Linear Feature Selection Algorithms
    Das, Prabal
    Sachindra, D. A.
    Chanda, Kironmala
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (15) : 6043 - 6071
  • [46] Machine Learning-Based Rainfall Forecasting with Multiple Non-Linear Feature Selection Algorithms
    Prabal Das
    D. A. Sachindra
    Kironmala Chanda
    Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 6043 - 6071
  • [47] Machine learning-based predictions and analyses of the creep rupture life of the Ni-based single crystal superalloy
    Fan Zou
    Pengjie Liu
    Yanzhan Chen
    Yaohua Zhao
    Scientific Reports, 14 (1)
  • [48] Machine learning-based markers for CAD
    Yu, Linghua
    LANCET, 2023, 402 (10397): : 182 - 182
  • [49] Machine learning-based prediction of transfusion
    Mitterecker, Andreas
    Hofmann, Axel
    Trentino, Kevin M.
    Lloyd, Adam
    Leahy, Michael F.
    Schwarzbauer, Karin
    Tschoellitsch, Thomas
    Boeck, Carl
    Hochreiter, Sepp
    Meier, Jens
    TRANSFUSION, 2020, 60 (09) : 1977 - 1986
  • [50] Machine Learning-Based Rowhammer Mitigation
    Joardar, Biresh Kumar
    Bletsch, Tyler K.
    Chakrabarty, Krishnendu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2023, 42 (05) : 1393 - 1405