Comparisons of Different Machine Learning-Based Rainfall-Runoff Simulations under Changing Environments

被引:3
|
作者
Li, Chenliang [1 ,2 ]
Jiao, Ying [3 ]
Kan, Guangyuan [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Xiaodi [1 ,2 ]
Chai, Fuxin [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Haijun [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Ke [4 ]
机构
[1] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, Res Ctr Flood & Drought Disaster Prevent & Reduct, Minist Water Resources, State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water Cycle River, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Water Resources, Key Lab Water Safety Beijing Tianjin Hebei Reg, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
[3] Design & Res Co Ltd, China Water Resources Bei Fang Invest, Tianjin 300222, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing IWHR Corp, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
changing environment; rainfall-runoff simulation; CatBoost; multi-hidden-layer BP neural network; long short-term memory neural network; CLIMATE; IMPACT; BASIN; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/w16020302
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate change and human activities have a great impact on the environment and have challenged the assumption of the stability of the hydrological time series and the consistency of the observed data. In order to investigate the applicability of machine learning (ML)-based rainfall-runoff (RR) simulation methods under a changing environment scenario, several ML-based RR simulation models implemented in novel continuous and non-real-time correction manners were constructed. The proposed models incorporated categorical boosting (CatBoost), a multi-hidden-layer BP neural network (MBP), and a long short-term memory neural network (LSTM) as the input-output simulators. This study focused on the Dongwan catchment of the Yiluo River Basin to carry out daily RR simulations for the purpose of verifying the model's applicability. Model performances were evaluated based on statistical indicators such as the deterministic coefficient, peak flow error, and runoff depth error. The research findings indicated that (1) ML-based RR simulation by using a consistency-disrupted dataset exhibited significant bias. During the validation phase for the three models, the R2 index decreased to around 0.6, and the peak flow error increased to over 20%. (2) Identifying data consistency transition points through data analysis and conducting staged RR simulations before and after the transition point can improve simulation accuracy. The R2 values for all three models during both the baseline and change periods were above 0.85, with peak flow and runoff depth errors of less than 20%. Among them, the CatBoost model demonstrated superior phased simulation accuracy and smoother simulation processes and closely matched the measured runoff processes across high, medium, and low water levels, with daily runoff simulation results surpassing those of the BP neural network and LSTM models. (3) When simulating the entire dataset without staged treatment, it is impossible to achieve good simulation results by adopting uniform extraction of the training samples. Under this scenario, the MBP exhibited the strongest generalization capability, highest prediction accuracy, better algorithm stability, and superior simulation accuracy compared to the CatBoost and LSTM simulators. This study offers new ideas and methods for enhancing the runoff simulation capabilities of machine learning models in changing environments.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Application of hybrid machine learning-based ensemble techniques for rainfall-runoff modeling
    Gelete, Gebre
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2023, 16 (3) : 2475 - 2495
  • [2] Application of hybrid machine learning-based ensemble techniques for rainfall-runoff modeling
    Gebre Gelete
    Earth Science Informatics, 2023, 16 : 2475 - 2495
  • [3] Comparison of different methodologies for rainfall-runoff modeling: machine learning vs conceptual approach
    Adnan, Rana Muhammad
    Petroselli, Andrea
    Heddam, Salim
    Santos, Celso Augusto Guimaraes
    Kisi, Ozgur
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2021, 105 (03) : 2987 - 3011
  • [4] TreeLSTM: A spatiotemporal machine learning model for rainfall-runoff estimation
    Chen, Zeqiang
    Lin, Hui
    Shen, Gaoyun
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2023, 48
  • [5] Rainfall-runoff modelling using the machine learning and conceptual hydrological models
    Dodangeh, Esmaeel
    Shahedi, Kaka
    Misra, Debasmita
    Sattari, Mohammad Taghi
    Pham, Binh Thai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 14 (03) : 229 - 250
  • [6] Assessing the Potential Robustness of Conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Models Under a Changing Climate
    Guo, Danlu
    Johnson, Fiona
    Marshall, Lucy
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2018, 54 (07) : 5030 - 5049
  • [7] Wavelet-based local mesh refinement for rainfall-runoff simulations
    Ozgen-Xian, Ilhan
    Kesserwani, Georges
    Caviedes-Voullieme, Daniel
    Molins, Sergi
    Xu, Zexuan
    Dwivedi, Dipankar
    Moulton, J. David
    Steefel, Carl, I
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2020, 22 (05) : 1059 - 1077
  • [8] Simulating runoff under changing climatic conditions: Revisiting an apparent deficiency of conceptual rainfall-runoff models
    Fowler, Keirnan J. A.
    Peel, Murray C.
    Western, Andrew W.
    Zhang, Lu
    Peterson, Tim J.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2016, 52 (03) : 1820 - 1846
  • [9] Enhancing Rainfall-Runoff Simulation via Meteorological Variables and a Deep-Conceptual Learning-Based Framework
    Achite, Mohammed
    Mohammadi, Babak
    Jehanzaib, Muhammad
    Elshaboury, Nehal
    Quoc Bao Pham
    Duan, Zheng
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (10)
  • [10] Hydrologically informed machine learning for rainfall-runoff modelling: towards distributed modelling
    Herath, Herath Mudiyanselage Viraj Vidura
    Chadalawada, Jayashree
    Babovic, Vladan
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (08) : 4373 - 4401