Optimal Configuration of Modular Strongrooms Using Multi-Attribute Decision Making

被引:0
|
作者
Dordevic, Violeta [1 ]
Grkovic, Vladan [2 ]
Kolarevic, Milan [2 ]
Radicevic, Branko [2 ]
Bjelic, Miso [2 ]
机构
[1] Acad Profess Studies Sumadija, Dept Trstenik, Radoja Krst 19, Trstenik 37240, Serbia
[2] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Mech & Civil Engn, Dositejeva 19, Kraljevo 36000, Serbia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 19期
关键词
knowledge-based engineering (KBE); multi-attribute decision making (MADM); modular strongrooms (MSR); computer aided design (CAD); analytic hierarchy process (AHP); simple additive weighting (SAW);
D O I
10.3390/app14198961
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
In this paper, we show that it is possible to obtain an optimal configuration variant of Modular Strongrooms (MSR) that satisfies the individual requirements of customers and is most economically advantageous for manufacturers. A model of the automatic configuration system for configuring MSR type MODULPRIM was developed, integrating the procedures for generating product variants, choosing the optimal configuration, and designing detailed products and technological processes. The developed model's importance lies in its ability to automatically select the optimal configuration from a set of possible configurations on a multidisciplinary basis. The problem of choosing was solved by integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods from the group of Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM). Validation of the proposed model was performed on eight examples of Modular Strongrooms type MODULPRIM 5 and showed great opportunities to improve efficiency and effectiveness in the process of innovative product development, as well as to obtain a product configuration with significantly improved quality. The proposed model has a high degree of flexibility and universality; thus, it can be further upgraded and integrated into a company's business system.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fuzzy Random Multi-attribute Decision Making Method
    Wang, Min
    FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, VOL 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 386 - 390
  • [32] Group decision making with multi-attribute interval data
    Yue, Zhongliang
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2013, 14 (04) : 551 - 561
  • [33] Multi-attribute decision-making in design choice
    Bedford, T
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (PSAM 4), VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 2391 - 2396
  • [34] Novel Method of Hybrid Multi-Attribute Decision Making
    Wang, Cheng
    Liu, Huanbin
    Li, Ping
    FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 353 - 356
  • [35] A new criterion for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making
    Lan, JB
    Xu, Y
    Liu, JZ
    APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2004, : 288 - 291
  • [36] Multi-attribute decision making with generalized fuzzy numbers
    Li, Guangxu
    Kou, Gang
    Lin, Changsheng
    Xu, Liang
    Liao, Yi
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2015, 66 (11) : 1793 - 1803
  • [37] Multi-attribute Decision Making Based on Fuzzy Outranking
    Nagata, Kiyoshi
    Amagasa, Michio
    Hirose, Hiroo
    13TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATICS (CINTI 2012), 2012, : 169 - 174
  • [38] Hybrid Multi-Attribute Decision Making Methods: An Application
    Ma, Yonghong
    Su, Xin
    Zhao, Yue
    TEHNICKI VJESNIK-TECHNICAL GAZETTE, 2018, 25 (05): : 1421 - 1428
  • [39] Probability numbers for multi-Attribute decision-making
    Weng, Shizhou
    Huang, Zhengwei
    Lv, Yuejin
    Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2024, 46 (03): : 6109 - 6132
  • [40] Multi-attribute decision making with dynamic weight allocation
    Jiao, Hongqiang
    Wang, Shuangyou
    INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES-NETHERLANDS, 2014, 8 (03): : 225 - 230