Optimal Configuration of Modular Strongrooms Using Multi-Attribute Decision Making

被引:0
|
作者
Dordevic, Violeta [1 ]
Grkovic, Vladan [2 ]
Kolarevic, Milan [2 ]
Radicevic, Branko [2 ]
Bjelic, Miso [2 ]
机构
[1] Acad Profess Studies Sumadija, Dept Trstenik, Radoja Krst 19, Trstenik 37240, Serbia
[2] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Mech & Civil Engn, Dositejeva 19, Kraljevo 36000, Serbia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 19期
关键词
knowledge-based engineering (KBE); multi-attribute decision making (MADM); modular strongrooms (MSR); computer aided design (CAD); analytic hierarchy process (AHP); simple additive weighting (SAW);
D O I
10.3390/app14198961
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
In this paper, we show that it is possible to obtain an optimal configuration variant of Modular Strongrooms (MSR) that satisfies the individual requirements of customers and is most economically advantageous for manufacturers. A model of the automatic configuration system for configuring MSR type MODULPRIM was developed, integrating the procedures for generating product variants, choosing the optimal configuration, and designing detailed products and technological processes. The developed model's importance lies in its ability to automatically select the optimal configuration from a set of possible configurations on a multidisciplinary basis. The problem of choosing was solved by integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods from the group of Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM). Validation of the proposed model was performed on eight examples of Modular Strongrooms type MODULPRIM 5 and showed great opportunities to improve efficiency and effectiveness in the process of innovative product development, as well as to obtain a product configuration with significantly improved quality. The proposed model has a high degree of flexibility and universality; thus, it can be further upgraded and integrated into a company's business system.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Novel Method of Solving Attribute Weights in Multi-attribute Decision Making
    Wang, Cheng
    Liu, Huanbin
    Rao, Congjun
    2008 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-11, 2008, : 2777 - 2779
  • [22] Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making
    Xu, Zeshui
    Yager, Ronald R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2008, 48 (01) : 246 - 262
  • [23] PROXY APPROACH TO MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING
    OPPENHEIMER, KR
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1978, 24 (06) : 675 - 689
  • [24] Modeling Strategy Switches in Multi-attribute Decision Making
    Lee M.D.
    Gluck K.A.
    Computational Brain & Behavior, 2021, 4 (2) : 148 - 163
  • [25] Application of multi-attribute decision making in maintainability design
    Du, Xiaoming
    Yu, Yongli
    Hu, Hui
    Zhongguo Jixie Gongcheng/China Mechanical Engineering, 1999, 10 (12): : 1386 - 1388
  • [26] Linguistic Multi-Attribute Decision Making with a Prioritization Relationship
    Wei, Cuiping
    Tang, Xijin
    Wang, Xiaojie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE AND SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2013, 4 (04) : 46 - 54
  • [27] Research on Hybrid Multi-attribute Decision-Making
    Sun, Guidong
    Guan, Xin
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER-ENABLED DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY PROCEEDINGS - CYBERC 2016, 2016, : 272 - 277
  • [28] Learning and strategy selection in multi-attribute decision making
    Arndt, Broeder
    Tilmann, Betsch
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 547 - 547
  • [29] Dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute decision making
    Xu, Zeshui
    Yager, Ronald R.
    International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2008, 48 (01): : 246 - 262
  • [30] Bayesian strategy assessment in multi-attribute decision making
    Bröder, A
    Schiffer, S
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 16 (03) : 193 - 213