Optimal Configuration of Modular Strongrooms Using Multi-Attribute Decision Making

被引:0
|
作者
Dordevic, Violeta [1 ]
Grkovic, Vladan [2 ]
Kolarevic, Milan [2 ]
Radicevic, Branko [2 ]
Bjelic, Miso [2 ]
机构
[1] Acad Profess Studies Sumadija, Dept Trstenik, Radoja Krst 19, Trstenik 37240, Serbia
[2] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Mech & Civil Engn, Dositejeva 19, Kraljevo 36000, Serbia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 19期
关键词
knowledge-based engineering (KBE); multi-attribute decision making (MADM); modular strongrooms (MSR); computer aided design (CAD); analytic hierarchy process (AHP); simple additive weighting (SAW);
D O I
10.3390/app14198961
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
In this paper, we show that it is possible to obtain an optimal configuration variant of Modular Strongrooms (MSR) that satisfies the individual requirements of customers and is most economically advantageous for manufacturers. A model of the automatic configuration system for configuring MSR type MODULPRIM was developed, integrating the procedures for generating product variants, choosing the optimal configuration, and designing detailed products and technological processes. The developed model's importance lies in its ability to automatically select the optimal configuration from a set of possible configurations on a multidisciplinary basis. The problem of choosing was solved by integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) methods from the group of Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM). Validation of the proposed model was performed on eight examples of Modular Strongrooms type MODULPRIM 5 and showed great opportunities to improve efficiency and effectiveness in the process of innovative product development, as well as to obtain a product configuration with significantly improved quality. The proposed model has a high degree of flexibility and universality; thus, it can be further upgraded and integrated into a company's business system.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal Multi-Attribute Decision Making in Social Choice Problems
    Sikdar, Sujoy
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, : 5783 - 5784
  • [2] Intelligent multi-attribute decision making
    Binggong Xuebao, 1 (90-93):
  • [3] Rank preference optimal ordering method in the multi-attribute decision making
    Chen, C.-F., 1600, Systems Engineering Society of China (32):
  • [4] Multi-attribute decision making using hypothetical equivalents and inequivalents
    See, TK
    Gurnani, A
    Lewis, K
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2004, 126 (06) : 950 - 958
  • [5] MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING USING CONSTRAINED CRITERIA
    SCHENKERMAN, S
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1977, 4 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [6] Multi-Attribute Decision Making Problem Using OWA Operator
    Nirmala, S. Vijaya
    Selvakumari, K.
    Kavitha, S.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL NEGATIVE RESULTS, 2022, 13 : 137 - 139
  • [7] Fusing Multi-Attribute Decision Models for Decision Making to Achieve Optimal Product Design
    Olabanji, Olayinka Mohammed
    Mpofu, Khumbulani
    FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTING AND DECISION SCIENCES, 2020, 45 (04) : 305 - 337
  • [8] On multi-period multi-attribute decision making
    Xu, Zeshui
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2008, 21 (02) : 164 - 171
  • [9] Linguistic CMAC for Multi-Attribute Decision Making
    He, Hongmei
    Lawry, Jonathan
    IMECS 2009: INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE OF ENGINEERS AND COMPUTER SCIENTISTS, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 48 - 53
  • [10] VARYING WEIGHTS IN MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING
    Qiu, Yuming
    Ge, Ping
    Junker, Joseph F.
    DETC2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE , VOL 4, 2009, : 449 - 456