Sensor placement for optimal aerodynamic data fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Barklage, Alexander [1 ]
Stradtner, Mario [1 ]
Bekemeyer, Philipp [1 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr, Lilienthalpl 7, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
MISSING POINT ESTIMATION; DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2024.109598
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Aircraft design is recently evolving towards a digital twin representation that involves many heterogeneous data sources. The aerodynamic development of aircraft usually incorporates data from computational fluid dynamics simulations, wind tunnel testing, and flight tests. All of these data sources have their advantages and disadvantages, which can optimally be combined using data fusion methods. However, the quality of the data fusion result strongly depends on the experimental design, i.e. the placement of discrete sensors. Therefore, an optimized sensor placement is essential for data fusion applications, as the number of sensors is limited. This work presents a sensor placement strategy for the widely used Gappy proper orthogonal decomposition data fusion methodology. The sensor placement relies on a Bayesian formulation of the data fusion, allowing accurate error estimates. Based on the Bayesian posterior, a utility function characterizes the quality of the fused result by quantifying the expected information gain for the proper orthogonal decomposition coefficients. As the optimization of the sensor locations involves a complex combinatorial problem, we introduce an efficient genetic algorithm for this task. The method is demonstrated on a two-dimensional airfoil and the NASA Common Research Model with synthetic measurement errors. For both test cases, an optimal sensor placement results in smaller reconstruction errors than a conventional layout. The Bayesian approach leads, in most cases, to more accurate reconstructions and is more versatile than other well-established sensor placement methods. The proposed genetic algorithm finds better optima with significantly fewer function evaluations than the widely used greedy algorithms.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal sensor placement for artificial swimmers
    Verma, Siddhartha
    Papadimitriou, Costas
    Luethen, Nora
    Arampatzis, Georgios
    Koumoutsakos, Petros
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2020, 884
  • [32] Approximating optimal visual sensor placement
    Hoerster, E.
    Lienhart, R.
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA AND EXPO - ICME 2006, VOLS 1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 1257 - +
  • [33] Optimal Sensor Placement for Observer Design
    Burns, John A.
    Herdman, Terry L.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2021, 54 (09): : 446 - 451
  • [34] Optimal sensor placement for border perambulation
    Watfa, Mohamed K.
    Commuri, Sesh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL, 2006, : 63 - +
  • [35] Optimal sensor placement for fault detection
    Worden, K
    Burrows, AP
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2001, 23 (08) : 885 - 901
  • [36] Optimal sensor placement for agent localization
    Jourdan, Damien B.
    Roy, Nicholas
    2006 IEEE/ION POSITION, LOCATION AND NAVIGATION SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 128 - +
  • [37] OPTIMAL SENSOR PLACEMENT FOR ACTIVE SENSING
    Flynn, Eric
    Todd, Michael
    SMASIS 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME CONFERENCE ON SMART MATERIALS, ADAPTIVE STRUCTURES AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS - 2008, VOL 2, 2009, : 105 - 113
  • [38] OPTIMAL SENSOR PLACEMENT IN 3 DIMENSIONS
    PREA, P
    SIAM REVIEW, 1995, 37 (01) : 112 - 113
  • [39] Study of optimal weight data fusion algorithm for multi-sensor
    Guo, L
    Zhang, X
    Ma, YH
    ICEMI'2003: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC MEASUREMENT & INSTRUMENTS, VOLS 1-3, 2003, : 452 - 455
  • [40] Optimal detection of bandlimited signals by multiple nonlinear sensor data fusion
    Suranthiran, S
    Jayasuriya, S
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2003 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2003, : 4161 - 4166