Sensor placement for optimal aerodynamic data fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Barklage, Alexander [1 ]
Stradtner, Mario [1 ]
Bekemeyer, Philipp [1 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr, Lilienthalpl 7, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
MISSING POINT ESTIMATION; DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2024.109598
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Aircraft design is recently evolving towards a digital twin representation that involves many heterogeneous data sources. The aerodynamic development of aircraft usually incorporates data from computational fluid dynamics simulations, wind tunnel testing, and flight tests. All of these data sources have their advantages and disadvantages, which can optimally be combined using data fusion methods. However, the quality of the data fusion result strongly depends on the experimental design, i.e. the placement of discrete sensors. Therefore, an optimized sensor placement is essential for data fusion applications, as the number of sensors is limited. This work presents a sensor placement strategy for the widely used Gappy proper orthogonal decomposition data fusion methodology. The sensor placement relies on a Bayesian formulation of the data fusion, allowing accurate error estimates. Based on the Bayesian posterior, a utility function characterizes the quality of the fused result by quantifying the expected information gain for the proper orthogonal decomposition coefficients. As the optimization of the sensor locations involves a complex combinatorial problem, we introduce an efficient genetic algorithm for this task. The method is demonstrated on a two-dimensional airfoil and the NASA Common Research Model with synthetic measurement errors. For both test cases, an optimal sensor placement results in smaller reconstruction errors than a conventional layout. The Bayesian approach leads, in most cases, to more accurate reconstructions and is more versatile than other well-established sensor placement methods. The proposed genetic algorithm finds better optima with significantly fewer function evaluations than the widely used greedy algorithms.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal dimensionality reduction of sensor data in multisensor estimation fusion
    Zhu, YM
    Song, EB
    Zhou, J
    You, ZS
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2005, 53 (05) : 1631 - 1639
  • [22] Serious Sensor Placement-Optimal Sensor Placement as a Serious Game
    Arbesser-Rastburg, Georg
    Fuchs-Hanusch, Daniela
    WATER, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [23] Sensor placement for RSSD-based localization: Optimal angular placement and sequential sensor placement
    Heydari, Ali
    Aghabozorgi, Masoud-Reza
    PHYSICAL COMMUNICATION, 2020, 42
  • [24] A data driven method for optimal sensor placement in multi-zone buildings
    Suryanarayana, Gowri
    Arroyo, Javier
    Helsen, Lieve
    Lago, Jesus
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2021, 243
  • [25] Data correlation analysis for optimal sensor placement using a bond energy algorithm
    Lu, Wei
    Wen, Runfa
    Teng, Jun
    Li, Xiaoling
    Li, Chao
    MEASUREMENT, 2016, 91 : 509 - 518
  • [26] Optimal Sensor Placement for Fault Diagnosis
    Djeziri, M. A.
    Bouamama, B. Ould
    Merzouki, R.
    Dauphin-Tanguy, G.
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 102 - +
  • [27] Optimal sensor placement for agent localization
    Jourdan, Damien B.
    Roy, Nicholas
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SENSOR NETWORKS, 2008, 4 (03)
  • [28] OPTIMAL SENSOR PLACEMENT: A ROBUST APPROACH
    Hintermueller, Michael
    Rautenberg, Carlos N.
    Mohammadi, Masoumeh
    Kanitsar, Martin
    SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2017, 55 (06) : 3609 - 3639
  • [29] OPTIMAL SENSOR PLACEMENT FOR SIGNAL EXTRACTION
    Ghayem, Fateme
    Rivet, Bertrand
    Jutten, Christian
    Farias, Rodrigo Cabral
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2019, : 4978 - 4982
  • [30] Optimal sensor placement for damage detection
    Krawczuk, M.
    Kudela, P.
    Ostachowicz, W.
    Palacz, M.
    Zak, A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD EUROPEAN WORKSHOP STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING 2006, 2006, : 1176 - +