Comparison of different methods of modal test on a spacecraft representative structure

被引:0
|
作者
Singal, R.K. [1 ]
Vigneron, F.R. [1 ]
Steele, T. [1 ]
Bertram, A. [1 ]
Degener, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Canadian Space Agency, Ottawa, Canada
关键词
Structural Analysis--Vibrations - Systems Science and Cybernetics--Identification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
FLECS, designed and manufactured by ESTEC, represents a typical modular spacecraft in terms of mass properties and modal density. The structure is well suited as a test item for the validation of dynamic identification methods and was, therefore, selected for the comparison of the following test methods: the phase resonance method with appropriate excitation (for every eigenmode, an exciter force distribution is found which compensates the damping forces of the structure); the mode separation method with excitation at various locations on the structure, with complex exponential; and a driven-base method with unidirectional base excitation. Since the structural damping level of FLECS is low compared to actual fully equipped satellite structures, the modal identification methods were also applied to a configuration of FLECS with supplemental non-proportional viscous damping. For this purpose, dampers were manufactured and integrated into the FLECS structure. This paper describes briefly the experience in applying the methods and compares the results.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 187
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR SPACECRAFT COLLISION PROBABILITY COMPUTATIONS
    Chan, Ken
    PROMOTE THE PROGRESS OF THE PACIFIC-BASIN REGION THROUGH SPACE INNOVATION, 2019, 166 : 399 - 413
  • [32] Modal characterization of additively manufactured TPMS structures: comparison between different modeling methods
    Simsek, Ugur
    Akbulut, Aykan
    Gayir, Cemal Efe
    Basaran, Cansu
    Sendur, Polat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 115 (03): : 657 - 674
  • [33] Modal characterization of additively manufactured TPMS structures: comparison between different modeling methods
    Simsek, Ugur
    Akbulut, Aykan
    Gayir, Cemal Efe
    Basaran, Cansu
    Sendur, Polat
    International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 115 (03): : 657 - 674
  • [34] Modal characterization of additively manufactured TPMS structures: comparison between different modeling methods
    Ugur Simsek
    Aykan Akbulut
    Cemal Efe Gayir
    Cansu Basaran
    Polat Sendur
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 115 : 657 - 674
  • [35] Spacecraft Structure Model Validation and Test Philosophy
    Aglietti, Guglielmo S.
    Remedia, Marcello
    Appolloni, Matteo
    Kiley, Andrew
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2019, 57 (05) : 2109 - 2122
  • [36] MODAL TEST METHODS - QUALITY, QUANTITY, AND UNOBTAINABLE
    MITCHELL, LD
    SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1994, 28 (11): : 10 - 17
  • [37] TEST METHODS AND PROPERTIES OF POWDERED MATERIALS - COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF MEASUREMENTS OF POROSITY BY DIFFERENT METHODS
    KAPTSEVICH, VM
    SHELEG, VK
    SAVICH, VV
    SOROKINA, AN
    MAZYUK, VV
    ANISHCHIK, TA
    SOVIET POWDER METALLURGY AND METAL CERAMICS, 1989, 28 (02): : 117 - 120
  • [38] Modal test methods - quality, quantity, and unobtainable
    Mitchell, Larry D.
    S V Sound and Vibration, 1994, 28 (11): : 10 - 17
  • [39] A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR RANKING BOARS FROM DIFFERENT CENTRAL TEST STATIONS
    MABRY, JW
    BENYSHEK, LL
    JOHNSON, MH
    LITTLE, DE
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1987, 65 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [40] Comparison of Young Moduli of Engineered Stones using Different Test Methods
    Lam dos Santos, Joao P.
    Amaral, Pedro M.
    Diogo, Antonio C.
    Rosa, Luis G.
    GLOBAL STONE CONGRESS, 2013, 548 : 220 - +