Comparison of different methods of modal test on a spacecraft representative structure

被引:0
|
作者
Singal, R.K. [1 ]
Vigneron, F.R. [1 ]
Steele, T. [1 ]
Bertram, A. [1 ]
Degener, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Canadian Space Agency, Ottawa, Canada
关键词
Structural Analysis--Vibrations - Systems Science and Cybernetics--Identification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
FLECS, designed and manufactured by ESTEC, represents a typical modular spacecraft in terms of mass properties and modal density. The structure is well suited as a test item for the validation of dynamic identification methods and was, therefore, selected for the comparison of the following test methods: the phase resonance method with appropriate excitation (for every eigenmode, an exciter force distribution is found which compensates the damping forces of the structure); the mode separation method with excitation at various locations on the structure, with complex exponential; and a driven-base method with unidirectional base excitation. Since the structural damping level of FLECS is low compared to actual fully equipped satellite structures, the modal identification methods were also applied to a configuration of FLECS with supplemental non-proportional viscous damping. For this purpose, dampers were manufactured and integrated into the FLECS structure. This paper describes briefly the experience in applying the methods and compares the results.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 187
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The atopy patch test - reproducibility and comparison of different evaluation methods
    Heinemann, C
    Schliemann-Willers, S
    Kelterer, D
    Metzner, U
    Kluge, K
    Wigger-Alberti, W
    Elsner, P
    ALLERGY, 2002, 57 (07) : 641 - 645
  • [22] Comparison of different statistical methods for evaluation of proficiency test data
    Rosario, Pedro
    Luis Martinez, Jose
    Miguel Silvan, Jose
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2008, 13 (09) : 493 - 499
  • [23] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF EXPRESSING RESULTS OF THE AMINOPYRINE BREATH TEST
    SCHOELLER, DA
    BAKER, AL
    MONROE, PS
    KRAGER, PS
    SCHNEIDER, JF
    HEPATOLOGY, 1982, 2 (04) : 455 - 462
  • [24] Comparison of different test methods for determining the mar resistance of clearcoats
    Wagner, G
    Osterhold, M
    MATERIALWISSENSCHAFT UND WERKSTOFFTECHNIK, 1999, 30 (10) : 617 - 622
  • [25] COMPARISON OF HPLC AND SOME OFFICIAL TEST METHODS FOR DIFFERENT PENICILLINS
    NACHTMANN, F
    GSTREIN, K
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 1980, 7 (01) : 55 - 62
  • [26] Comparison of different methods and times for reading the tuberculin skin test
    Moran-Mendoza, O.
    Tello-Zavala, M. C.
    Rivera-Camarillo, M.
    Rios-Meza, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2013, 17 (10) : 1273 - 1278
  • [27] A COMPARISON OF RELIABILITY OF DIFFERENT METHODS IN WAALER-ROSE TEST
    TIILIKAINEN, A
    ACTA PATHOLOGICA ET MICROBIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1962, (154): : 221 - &
  • [28] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR EVALUATION OF ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST
    KOBBERLING, J
    CREUTZFELDT, W
    DIABETES, 1970, 19 (11) : 870 - +
  • [29] Comparison of diagnostic findings using different olfactory test methods
    Tsukatani, T
    Reiter, ER
    Miwa, T
    Costanzo, RM
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (06): : 1114 - 1117
  • [30] Comparison of modal testing methods of aircraft
    Sano, M
    Komatsu, K
    Minegishi, M
    IMAC - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS CONFERENCE, VOLS I AND II, 1999, 3727 : 2049 - 2055