Comparison of different methods of modal test on a spacecraft representative structure

被引:0
|
作者
Singal, R.K. [1 ]
Vigneron, F.R. [1 ]
Steele, T. [1 ]
Bertram, A. [1 ]
Degener, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Canadian Space Agency, Ottawa, Canada
关键词
Structural Analysis--Vibrations - Systems Science and Cybernetics--Identification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
FLECS, designed and manufactured by ESTEC, represents a typical modular spacecraft in terms of mass properties and modal density. The structure is well suited as a test item for the validation of dynamic identification methods and was, therefore, selected for the comparison of the following test methods: the phase resonance method with appropriate excitation (for every eigenmode, an exciter force distribution is found which compensates the damping forces of the structure); the mode separation method with excitation at various locations on the structure, with complex exponential; and a driven-base method with unidirectional base excitation. Since the structural damping level of FLECS is low compared to actual fully equipped satellite structures, the modal identification methods were also applied to a configuration of FLECS with supplemental non-proportional viscous damping. For this purpose, dampers were manufactured and integrated into the FLECS structure. This paper describes briefly the experience in applying the methods and compares the results.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 187
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF SPACECRAFT MODAL TEST METHODS
    CHEN, JC
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1987, 24 (01) : 52 - 62
  • [2] EXPERIMENTAL IDENTIFICATION OF MODAL IDENTITY-RELATED PARAMETERS OF A SPACECRAFT REPRESENTATIVE STRUCTURE
    VIGNERON, FR
    SINGAL, RK
    SOUCY, Y
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1990, 28 (07) : 1292 - 1299
  • [3] Modal test of the Cassini spacecraft
    Smith, KS
    Peng, CY
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS CONFERENCE - IMAC, VOLS I AND II, 1997, 3089 : 804 - 810
  • [4] Cable shielding test methods - A comparison of different test methods
    Mueller, Joachim
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY: WORKSHOP AND TUTORIAL NOTES, VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 1178 - 1183
  • [5] Comparison of Different Item Scoring Methods and Different Test Scoring Methods
    Yurdugul, Halil
    JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY-EPOD, 2010, 1 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [6] THE INVESTIGATION OF ACOUSTIC TEST SPECIFICATIONS ON SPACECRAFT STRUCTURE BY NUMERICAL ANALYSIS METHODS
    Xiang Shuhong
    Li Ye
    Zhang Jungang
    Fang Guiquan
    Li XinMing
    Yan TingFei
    Sun Wei
    Zheng Ling
    Zeng Jie
    Zhang Dongdong
    Zhu Zhenya
    Liu Wanglin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON SOUND AND VIBRATION: MAJOR CHALLENGES IN ACOUSTICS, NOISE AND VIBRATION RESEARCH, 2015, 2015,
  • [7] COMPARISON OF SMOOTHNESS EVALUATED BY DIFFERENT TEST METHODS
    BRADWAY, KE
    TAPPI, 1980, 63 (11): : 95 - 98
  • [8] Modal survey test and model correlation of the CASSIOPE spacecraft
    V. Wickramasinghe
    Y. Chen
    D. Zimcik
    P. Tremblay
    H. Dahl
    I. Walkty
    Experimental Techniques, 2013, 37 : 15 - 23
  • [9] Modal Survey Test and Model Correlation of the CASSIOPE Spacecraft
    Wickramasinghe, V.
    Chen, Y.
    Zimcik, D.
    Tremblay, P.
    Dahl, H.
    Walkty, I.
    EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 37 (06) : 15 - 23
  • [10] MODAL TEST METHODS AND APPLICATIONS
    STAHLE, CV
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 1978, 21 (01): : 24 - &