Bridge inspection decision making based on sequential hypothesis testing methods

被引:0
|
作者
Madanat, S. [1 ]
Lin, D.-J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept. of Civil and Environ. Eng., University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States
关键词
Algorithms - Bridge components - Computer simulation - Cost effectiveness - Decision making - Decision support systems - Inspection - Mathematical models - Probability - Reconstruction (structural) - Statistical methods;
D O I
10.3141/1697-03
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A bridge management system (BMS) is a decision support system used by a highway agency in selecting appropriate maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) activities and in allocating available resources effectively among facilities. BMS decision making is based on the condition of bridge components, their predicted deterioration, and the cost and effectiveness of M&R activities. Traditionally, bridge condition assessments have relied mainly on human inspectors; their results have generally been qualitative and subjective. More detailed inspections requiring some degree of destruction of the bridge, like drilling the deck to inspect for chloride contamination, have also been used. With recent technological developments, methods have been developed to evaluate the condition of bridge structures in a quantitative and objective manner. Associated with the use of these technologies are questions relating to inspection frequency, sample size, and the integration of data from the various technologies and human inspections. The application of a statistical decision-making method, sequential hypothesis testing, to these questions is presented. The mathematical formulation of the sequential hypothesis testing model, the derivation of optimal inspection policies, and the implementation of these policies in the context of bridge component inspection are discussed. A parametric analysis illustrates the sensitivity of the method to the cost structure of the problem, the precision of the technologies used, and the historical information or expert judgment regarding the condition of bridge components.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FACTOR-ANALYSIS IN HYPOTHESIS-TESTING AND DECISION-MAKING
    MEGEE, M
    PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1964, 16 (04): : 24 - 27
  • [22] UN Security Council decision-making: testing the bribery hypothesis
    Lazzarotti Diniz Costa, Eugenio Pacelli
    Baccarini, Mariana
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE POLITICA INTERNACIONAL, 2014, 57 (02): : 29 - 57
  • [23] On the uncertainty in sequential hypothesis testing
    Santiago-Mozos, R.
    Fernandez-Lorenzana, R.
    Perez-Curz, F.
    Artes-Rodriguez, A.
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: FROM NANO TO MACRO, VOLS 1-4, 2008, : 1223 - +
  • [24] Sequential Hypothesis Testing Game
    Peng, Guanze
    Zhu, Quanyan
    2020 54TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCES AND SYSTEMS (CISS), 2020, : 1 - 6
  • [25] ACTIVE SEQUENTIAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING
    Naghshvar, Mohammad
    Javidi, Tara
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2013, 41 (06): : 2703 - 2738
  • [26] Inverse Sequential Hypothesis Testing
    Pattanayak, Kunal
    Krishnamurthy, Vikram
    Blasch, Erik
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION FUSION (FUSION 2020), 2020, : 797 - 803
  • [27] Covert Sequential Hypothesis Testing
    Chang, Meng-Che
    Bloch, Matthieu R.
    2021 IEEE INFORMATION THEORY WORKSHOP (ITW), 2021,
  • [28] A Dilemma for Respecting Autonomy: Bridge Technologies and the Hazards of Sequential Decision-Making
    Kestigian, Aidan
    London, Alex John
    JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2022, 47 (02): : 293 - 310
  • [29] Kernel-Based Methods for Hypothesis Testing
    Harchaoui, Zaid
    Bach, Francis
    Cappe, Olivier
    Moulines, Eric
    IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING MAGAZINE, 2013, 30 (04) : 87 - 97
  • [30] What to Choose Next? A Paradigm for Testing Human Sequential Decision Making
    Tartaglia, Elisa M.
    Clarke, Aaron M.
    Herzog, Michael H.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8