Bridge inspection decision making based on sequential hypothesis testing methods

被引:0
|
作者
Madanat, S. [1 ]
Lin, D.-J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept. of Civil and Environ. Eng., University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States
关键词
Algorithms - Bridge components - Computer simulation - Cost effectiveness - Decision making - Decision support systems - Inspection - Mathematical models - Probability - Reconstruction (structural) - Statistical methods;
D O I
10.3141/1697-03
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A bridge management system (BMS) is a decision support system used by a highway agency in selecting appropriate maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) activities and in allocating available resources effectively among facilities. BMS decision making is based on the condition of bridge components, their predicted deterioration, and the cost and effectiveness of M&R activities. Traditionally, bridge condition assessments have relied mainly on human inspectors; their results have generally been qualitative and subjective. More detailed inspections requiring some degree of destruction of the bridge, like drilling the deck to inspect for chloride contamination, have also been used. With recent technological developments, methods have been developed to evaluate the condition of bridge structures in a quantitative and objective manner. Associated with the use of these technologies are questions relating to inspection frequency, sample size, and the integration of data from the various technologies and human inspections. The application of a statistical decision-making method, sequential hypothesis testing, to these questions is presented. The mathematical formulation of the sequential hypothesis testing model, the derivation of optimal inspection policies, and the implementation of these policies in the context of bridge component inspection are discussed. A parametric analysis illustrates the sensitivity of the method to the cost structure of the problem, the precision of the technologies used, and the historical information or expert judgment regarding the condition of bridge components.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Methods of sequential hypothesis testing for the drift of a fractional Brownian motion
    Muravlev, A. A.
    RUSSIAN MATHEMATICAL SURVEYS, 2013, 68 (03) : 577 - 579
  • [12] VOCATIONAL HYPOTHESIS-TESTING IN CAREER DECISION-MAKING
    BLUSTEIN, DL
    STROHMER, DC
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1987, 31 (01) : 45 - 62
  • [13] AUTONOMIC REACTIVITY OF HYPOTHESIS-TESTING IN DECISION-MAKING
    Terasawa, Yuri
    Umeda, Satoshi
    PSYCHOLOGIA, 2010, 53 (03) : 195 - 206
  • [14] Z-fuzzy hypothesis testing in statistical decision making
    Haktanir, Elif
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 37 (05) : 6545 - 6555
  • [15] A decision-making system for large span bridge inspection intervals based on sliding window DFNN
    Zhang, Guo-Qing
    Min, Quan
    Wang, Bin
    ADVANCES IN BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2023, 4 (01):
  • [16] Experimental analysis of sequential decision making algorithms for port of entry inspection procedures
    Anand, Saket
    Madigan, David
    Mammone, Richard
    Pathak, Saumitr
    Roberts, Fred
    INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY INFORMATICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 3975 : 319 - 330
  • [17] Non-destructive testing methods in the US for bridge inspection and maintenance
    Lee, Sangwook
    Kalos, Niko
    Shin, Do Hyoung
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 18 (05) : 1322 - 1331
  • [18] Bridge inspection practices using non-destructive testing methods
    Lee, Sangwook
    Kalos, Nikolas
    JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 21 (05) : 654 - 665
  • [19] A Review of Symbolic, Subsymbolic and Hybrid Methods for Sequential Decision Making
    Nunez-Molina, Carlos
    Mesejo, Pablo
    Fernandez-Olivares, Juan
    ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2024, 56 (11)
  • [20] Quantum Sequential Hypothesis Testing
    Vargas, Esteban Martinez
    Hirche, Christoph
    Sentis, Gael
    Skotiniotis, Michalis
    Carrizo, Marta
    Munoz-Tapia, Ramon
    Calsamiglia, John
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2021, 126 (18)