Bridge inspection decision making based on sequential hypothesis testing methods

被引:0
|
作者
Madanat, S. [1 ]
Lin, D.-J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept. of Civil and Environ. Eng., University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States
关键词
Algorithms - Bridge components - Computer simulation - Cost effectiveness - Decision making - Decision support systems - Inspection - Mathematical models - Probability - Reconstruction (structural) - Statistical methods;
D O I
10.3141/1697-03
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A bridge management system (BMS) is a decision support system used by a highway agency in selecting appropriate maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) activities and in allocating available resources effectively among facilities. BMS decision making is based on the condition of bridge components, their predicted deterioration, and the cost and effectiveness of M&R activities. Traditionally, bridge condition assessments have relied mainly on human inspectors; their results have generally been qualitative and subjective. More detailed inspections requiring some degree of destruction of the bridge, like drilling the deck to inspect for chloride contamination, have also been used. With recent technological developments, methods have been developed to evaluate the condition of bridge structures in a quantitative and objective manner. Associated with the use of these technologies are questions relating to inspection frequency, sample size, and the integration of data from the various technologies and human inspections. The application of a statistical decision-making method, sequential hypothesis testing, to these questions is presented. The mathematical formulation of the sequential hypothesis testing model, the derivation of optimal inspection policies, and the implementation of these policies in the context of bridge component inspection are discussed. A parametric analysis illustrates the sensitivity of the method to the cost structure of the problem, the precision of the technologies used, and the historical information or expert judgment regarding the condition of bridge components.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bridge inspection decision making based on sequential hypothesis testing methods
    Madanat, S
    Lin, DJ
    MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT OF BRIDGES AND PAVEMENTS: MAINTENANCE, 2000, (1697): : 14 - 18
  • [2] Sequential Decision Making in Two-Dimensional Hypothesis Testing
    Carlisle, Michael
    Hadjiliadis, Olympia
    2013 IEEE 52ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2013, : 6508 - 6515
  • [3] Decision-making model for bridge inspection and maintenance based on benefit maximization
    Han, Da-Jian
    Pan, Ling
    Huanan Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science), 2009, 37 (03): : 99 - 103
  • [4] Hypothesis Testing Preferences in Research Decision Making
    Anglin, Stephanie M.
    Otten, Caitlin Drummond
    Broomell, Stephen B.
    COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [5] Multiple hypothesis testing method for decision making
    Wang, XG
    Shen, HC
    ICRA '99: IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 2090 - 2095
  • [6] Robust and Adaptive Methods for Sequential Decision Making
    Koolen, Wouter M.
    ERCIM NEWS, 2016, (107): : 24 - 25
  • [7] Modeling the Optimal Maintenance Strategy for Bridge Elements Based on Agent Sequential Decision Making
    Xin, Gongfeng
    Liang, Zhiqiang
    Hu, Yerong
    Long, Guanxu
    Zhang, Yang
    Liang, Peng
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [8] Decision-Making in Research Tasks with Sequential Testing
    Pfeiffer, Thomas
    Rand, David G.
    Dreher, Anna
    PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (02):
  • [9] Efficient Sequential Decision-Making Algorithms for Container Inspection Operations
    Madigan, David
    Mittal, Sushil
    Roberts, Fred
    NAVAL RESEARCH LOGISTICS, 2011, 58 (07) : 637 - 654
  • [10] Meta-Learning Hypothesis Spaces for Sequential Decision-making
    Kassraie, Parnian
    Rothfuss, Jonas
    Krause, Andreas
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 162, 2022, : 10802 - 10824