Seismic design guidelines and provisions for steel-framed buildings: FEMA 267/267A and 1997 AISC Seismic Provisions

被引:0
|
作者
Malley, James O.
Carter, Charles J.
Saunders, C. Mark
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1193/1.1586090
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the important surprises of the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994, was the widespread and unanticipated brittle fracture of welded steel beam-to-column connections. Although no casualties or collapses occurred during the Northridge earthquake as a result of these connection failures, and many WSMF buildings were not damaged at all, a wide spectrum of brittle connection damage did occur, ranging from minor cracking to completely severed columns. This paper summarizes two of the most important documents that have been developed in response to the damage suffered to steel moment frame buildings in the Northridge earthquake. The first, FEMA 267, Interim Guidelines: Evaluation, Repair, Modification and Design of Welded Steel Moment Frame Structures, was generated from studies undertaken as part of a project initiated by the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to reduce the earthquake hazards posed by steel moment-resisting frame buildings. The second document addressed in this paper is the 1997 edition of the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (commonly referred to as the AISC Seismic Provisions) that incorporates the new information generated by the FEMA-sponsored project and other investigations on the seismic performance of steel structures, and has been adopted by reference into the 2000 International Building Code (IBC).
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 203
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Parametric Study on the Seismic Response of Steel-Framed Buildings with Self-Centering Tension-Only Braces
    Chi, Pei
    Tian, Wenlong
    Guo, Tong
    Cao, Dafu
    Dong, Jun
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [32] Torsional effects in symmetrical steel buckling restrained braced frames: evaluation of seismic design provisions
    Roy, Jonathan
    Tremblay, Robert
    Leger, Pierre
    EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2015, 8 (02) : 423 - 442
  • [33] A rational approach for determining response modification factors for seismic design of buildings using current code provisions
    Foutch, DA
    Wilcoski, J
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2005, 21 (02) : 339 - 352
  • [34] A Critical Review of European and American Provisions for the Seismic Assessment of Existing Steel Moment-Resisting Frame Buildings
    Araujo, Miguel
    Castro, Jose Miguel
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 (08) : 1336 - 1364
  • [36] Practice-oriented numerical model for seismic response of cold-formed steel-framed mid-rise buildings
    Singh, Amanpreet
    Zhang, Zhidong
    Wang, Xiang
    Schafer, Benjamin W.
    Hutchinson, Tara C.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2024, 319
  • [37] Optimum seismic design of steel framed-tube and tube-in-tube tall buildings
    Sarcheshmehpour, Mohammad
    Estekanchi, Homayoon E.
    Moosavian, Hashem
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2020, 29 (14):
  • [38] Efficient seismic risk assessment of irregular steel-framed buildings through endurance time analysis of consistent fish-bone model
    Amiri, Hossein Ahmadie
    Hosseini, Mojtaba
    Estekanchi, Homayoon E.
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2022, 31 (02):
  • [39] Incremental dynamic analysis and FEMA P695 seismic performance evaluation of a cold-formed steel-framed building with gravity framing and architectural sheathing
    Leng, Jiazhen
    Buonopane, Stephen G.
    Schafer, Benjamin W.
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2020, 49 (04): : 394 - 412
  • [40] Evaluation of the Canadian Seismic Design Provisions for Wide-Flange Columns in Steel Moment-Resisting Frames
    Islam, Abrar
    Imanpour, Ali
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL STRUCTURES IN SEISMIC AREAS, STESSA 2022, 2022, 262 : 995 - 1003