An Adaptive Decision-Making System for Behavior Analysis Among Young Adults

被引:0
|
作者
Pragathi, Subramaniam [1 ]
Narayanamoorthy, Samayan [1 ]
Pamucar, Dragan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kang, Daekook [5 ]
机构
[1] Bharathiar Univ, Dept Math, Coimbatore 641046, India
[2] Univ Belgrade, Fac Org Sci, Dept Operat Res & Stat, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Yuan Ze Univ, Coll Engn, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
[4] Sunway Univ, Sch Engn & Technol, Selangor, Malaysia
[5] Inje Univ, Dept Ind & Management Engn, 197 Inje Ro, Gimhae Si 50834, Gyeongsangnam D, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Pandemic; Mental illness; Vague data; Decision model; Score function; COVID-19; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s12559-024-10372-3
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The global spread of the pandemic, secure isolation regulations, logistical limitations, and delays in reopening educational institutions such as colleges and universities have all had a severe psychological impact. Students, in particular, are regarded as a vulnerable population, experiencing higher levels of fear, stress, depression, and unhealthy eating compared to the general population. To reduce these psychological consequences, the study provides a multi-dimensional evaluation approach to bridge the gap between governments and health institutions in preventing and controlling biological hazards, such as mental illness among students. In the aftermath of the pandemic, this study presents a comprehensive evaluation approach designed to mitigate the psychological impact on students by connecting governments and health institutions in preventing and controlling biological hazards, particularly mental illness. To establish complex and vague data concerning the discussed communities, psychological details were obtained in the complex spherical fuzzy N\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \mathscr {N}$$\end{document}-soft context. An enhanced group decision-making methodology was then established in two phases. Initially, weight analytics were defined using the Reyni entropy technique. In the subsequent phase, the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) approach was applied to examine the possibilities. Students attending schools and colleges experience significant psychological impacts. To evaluate these effects, an analytical study was conducted, suggesting that improved educational amenities are necessary to mitigate these psychological consequences. Furthermore, the study validates the significance of the proposed decision system through its analysis. A unique score function is suggested for analyzing the psychological consequences among adults because it effectively addresses the ambiguity in periodic data, resulting in accurate and consistent judgments within a two-dimensional framework. Experts thoroughly analyzed the data using the complex spherical fuzzy N\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \mathscr {N}$$\end{document}-soft set-integrated CoCoSo method, and its limitations were also addressed.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prosocial Learning and Decision-Making in Young Adults With Alcohol Use Disorder
    Jangard, Simon
    Lindstrom, Bjorn
    Khemiri, Lotfi
    Olsson, Andreas
    Jayaram-Lindstrom, Nitya
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 89 (09) : S214 - S214
  • [42] The adaptive decision-making, risky decision, and decision-making style of Internet gaming disorder
    Ko, C. -H.
    Wang, P. -W.
    Liu, T. -L.
    Chen, C. -S.
    Yen, C. -F.
    Yen, J. -Y.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 44 : 189 - 197
  • [43] IoT Framework for a Decision-Making System of Obesity and Overweight Extrapolation among Children, Youths, and Adults
    Alsareii, Saeed Ali
    Shaf, Ahmad
    Ali, Tariq
    Zafar, Maryam
    Alamri, Abdulrahman Manaa
    AlAsmari, Mansour Yousef
    Irfan, Muhammad
    Awais, Muhammad
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [44] Development of intelligent network storage system with adaptive decision-making
    Sahagun, Roy Lao
    Ren, Shu Qin
    Beng, Ho Seng
    Aung, Khin Mi Mi
    International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, 2012, 4 (02) : 122 - 131
  • [45] Mechanism and Analysis of Parking Reservation Decision-Making Behavior
    Han, Yan
    Peng, Yu Qing
    Zhang, Qin
    Zhang, Meng Da
    CICTP 2020: TRANSPORTATION EVOLUTION IMPACTING FUTURE MOBILITY, 2020, : 2179 - 2192
  • [46] DIMENSIONS OF DECISION-MAKING BEHAVIOR
    SINGER, E
    ROBY, TB
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1967, 24 (02) : 571 - &
  • [47] DECISION-MAKING AND THE BEHAVIOR GAP
    HAMRICK, MH
    ANSPAUGH, DJ
    SMITH, DL
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 1980, 50 (08) : 455 - 458
  • [48] On Government Behavior of Decision-making
    Tang Shi-Jun
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (4TH), VOL II, 2008, : 127 - 132
  • [49] Brain and Behavior in Decision-Making
    Cassey, Peter
    Heathcote, Andrew
    Brown, Scott D.
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 10 (07)
  • [50] INFLUENCES ON DECISION-MAKING BEHAVIOR
    DABOVAL, J
    COMISH, R
    SWINDLE, B
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1995, 76 (01) : 176 - 178