An Adaptive Decision-Making System for Behavior Analysis Among Young Adults

被引:0
|
作者
Pragathi, Subramaniam [1 ]
Narayanamoorthy, Samayan [1 ]
Pamucar, Dragan [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kang, Daekook [5 ]
机构
[1] Bharathiar Univ, Dept Math, Coimbatore 641046, India
[2] Univ Belgrade, Fac Org Sci, Dept Operat Res & Stat, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Yuan Ze Univ, Coll Engn, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
[4] Sunway Univ, Sch Engn & Technol, Selangor, Malaysia
[5] Inje Univ, Dept Ind & Management Engn, 197 Inje Ro, Gimhae Si 50834, Gyeongsangnam D, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Pandemic; Mental illness; Vague data; Decision model; Score function; COVID-19; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s12559-024-10372-3
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The global spread of the pandemic, secure isolation regulations, logistical limitations, and delays in reopening educational institutions such as colleges and universities have all had a severe psychological impact. Students, in particular, are regarded as a vulnerable population, experiencing higher levels of fear, stress, depression, and unhealthy eating compared to the general population. To reduce these psychological consequences, the study provides a multi-dimensional evaluation approach to bridge the gap between governments and health institutions in preventing and controlling biological hazards, such as mental illness among students. In the aftermath of the pandemic, this study presents a comprehensive evaluation approach designed to mitigate the psychological impact on students by connecting governments and health institutions in preventing and controlling biological hazards, particularly mental illness. To establish complex and vague data concerning the discussed communities, psychological details were obtained in the complex spherical fuzzy N\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \mathscr {N}$$\end{document}-soft context. An enhanced group decision-making methodology was then established in two phases. Initially, weight analytics were defined using the Reyni entropy technique. In the subsequent phase, the Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) approach was applied to examine the possibilities. Students attending schools and colleges experience significant psychological impacts. To evaluate these effects, an analytical study was conducted, suggesting that improved educational amenities are necessary to mitigate these psychological consequences. Furthermore, the study validates the significance of the proposed decision system through its analysis. A unique score function is suggested for analyzing the psychological consequences among adults because it effectively addresses the ambiguity in periodic data, resulting in accurate and consistent judgments within a two-dimensional framework. Experts thoroughly analyzed the data using the complex spherical fuzzy N\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \mathscr {N}$$\end{document}-soft set-integrated CoCoSo method, and its limitations were also addressed.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Group decision-making on risky choice in adolescents and young adults
    Zhang, Weiwei
    Jiang, Yingying
    Wang, Chao
    Zhu, Liqi
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (34) : 29986 - 29995
  • [22] Group decision-making on risky choice in adolescents and young adults
    Weiwei Zhang
    Yingying Jiang
    Chao Wang
    Liqi Zhu
    Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 29986 - 29995
  • [23] CAREER DECISION-MAKING FACTORS IN GIFTED YOUNG-ADULTS
    EMMETT, JD
    MINOR, CW
    CAREER DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 1993, 41 (04): : 350 - 366
  • [24] Treatment Decision-Making Involvement in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer
    Pyke-Grimm, Kimberly A.
    Franck, Linda S.
    Kelly, Katherine Patterson
    Halpern-Felsher, Bonnie
    Goldsby, Robert E.
    Kleiman, Ari
    Rehm, Roberta S.
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2019, 46 (01) : E22 - E37
  • [25] Cancer-Related Decision-Making Among Adolescents, Young Adults, Caregivers, and Oncology Providers
    Darabos, Katie
    Berger, Allison J.
    Barakat, Lamia P.
    Schwartz, Lisa A.
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2021, 31 (13) : 2355 - 2363
  • [26] Cancer treatment decision-making among young adults with lung and colorectal cancer: a comparison with adults in middle age
    Mack, Jennifer W.
    Cronin, Angel
    Fasciano, Karen
    Block, Susan D.
    Keating, Nancy L.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 25 (09) : 1085 - 1091
  • [27] The stuff that dreams are made of: narratives on educational decision-making among young adults in Cape Town
    de Lannoy, Ariane
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2011, (51): : 53 - 72
  • [28] Treatment and Decision-Making Preferences of Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer and Their Parents or Trusted Persons: An Adaptive Conjoint Analysis Study
    Snaman, Jennifer M.
    Feifer, Deborah
    Helton, Gabrielle
    Herold, Benjamin
    Chen, Li
    Mazzola, Emanuele
    Rosenberg, Abby R.
    Baker, Justin N.
    Wolfe, Joanne
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2025,
  • [29] A MODEL OF FERTILITY DECISION-MAKING STYLES AMONG YOUNG MOTHERS
    DUNN, SK
    HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 1988, 47 (02) : 166 - 175
  • [30] ADAPTIVE MODEL FOR DECISION-MAKING
    SOKLIC, ME
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1982, 15 (06) : 485 - 493