6.5.2 Modeling and Analysis Framework for Risk-Informed Decision Making for FAA NextGen

被引:0
|
作者
机构
[1] Blackburn, Mark R.
[2] Pyster, Art
[3] Zigh, Teresa
[4] Turner, Richard
[5] Dillon-Merrill, Robin
来源
| 1600年 / John Wiley and Sons Inc卷 / 23期
关键词
Analysis and models - Analysis frameworks - Causal relationships - Federal Aviation Administration - Modelling and analysis - Modelling framework - Next-generation air transportation systems - NEXTGEN - Non-technical factors - Risk-informed decision making;
D O I
10.1002/j.2334-5837.2013.tb03027.x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper discusses an analysis and modeling framework that is being developed to support risk-informed decision-making for the Federal Aviation Administration Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen). Discussions with over 60 stakeholders identified challenges for those responsible for planning, developing, and deploying NextGen capabilities. There are a confluence of technical and non-technical factors that are important to effectively roll out capabilities. People's internal knowledge is much greater than what is captured externally or formally. Additionally, this knowledge and the causal relationships to program factors are not formalized in a way to support this complex decision-making process. The paper describes a Bayesian network-based analysis and modeling framework with usage scenarios for calculating cost, schedule and benefit risks to support collaborative decision-making throughout the phases of the FAA's acquisition lifecycle process. © 2013 The Authors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A TECHNICAL OVERVIEW OF THE JAPAN'S STANDARDS FOR RISK-INFORMED DECISION MAKING
    Narumiya, Yoshiyuki
    Hirano, Mitsumasa
    Hirano, Masashi.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING 2010, VOL 3, 2011, : 653 - +
  • [32] Future exposure modelling for risk-informed decision making in urban planning
    Mentese, Emin Yahya
    Cremen, Gemma
    Gentile, Roberto
    Galasso, Carmine
    Filippi, Maria Evangelina
    McCloskey, John
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2023, 90
  • [33] Risk-informed decision making in generic safety issue resolution and rulemaking
    Weerakkody, SD
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 938 - 943
  • [34] A risk-informed decision framework for setting environmental windows for dredging projects
    Suedel, Burton C.
    Kim, Jongbum
    Clarke, Douglas G.
    Linkov, Igor
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 403 (1-3) : 1 - 11
  • [35] Wildland Firefighter Estimated Ground Evacuation Time Modeling to Support Risk-Informed Decision-Making
    Campbell, Michael J.
    Gannon, Benjamin M.
    Rahman, Obaidur
    Stratton, Richard D.
    Dennison, Philip E.
    FIRE-SWITZERLAND, 2024, 7 (08):
  • [36] Dealing with epistemic uncertainty in risk-informed decision making for dam safety management
    Morales-Torres, Adrian
    Escuder-Bueno, Ignacio
    Serrano-Lombillo, Armando
    Castillo Rodriguez, Jesica T.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 191
  • [37] Importance measures in risk-informed decision making: Ranking, optimisation and configuration control
    Vaurio, Jussi K.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (11) : 1426 - 1436
  • [38] An Ito model of pit corrosion in pipelines for evaluating risk-informed decision making
    Fontes, G. S.
    Frutuoso e Melo, P. F.
    Alves, A. S. De Martin
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2015, 293 : 485 - 491
  • [39] Uncertainty in PRA and its implications for use in risk-informed decision-making
    Parry, GW
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT (PSAM 4), VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 2190 - 2195
  • [40] A hybrid approach for risk-informed decision-making in supply chain projects
    Zhang, Xu
    Bai, Sijun
    Qazi, Abroon
    Goh, Mark
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024,