Study on progressive collapse of overall structure based on numerical simulation method and prediction of structural collapse

被引:0
|
作者
Guo, Yuxu [1 ]
Yang, Bo [1 ]
Dai, Zheng [1 ]
Alqawzai, Shagea [1 ]
Chen, Kang [2 ]
Kong, Deyang [3 ]
Tang, Xiangyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Civil Engn, 83 Shapingba, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 111 Renai Rd, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, E1A-02-16,1 Engn Dr 2, Singapore 117576, Singapore
来源
关键词
Steel frame structure; Progressive collapse; Numerical simulation; Collapse response; Simplified method;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111416
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study investigated the structural progressive collapse using finite element (FE) and theoretical methods. Firstly, an FE model was established based on the component method and layered shell element method. The reliability of modeling approaches was evaluated by comparing them with the previous experimental tests by the author. The NIST building was taken as an example to investigate the structural collapse behavior and the failure modes after different component failure scenarios including single column, double columns, multiple columns, and horizontal components based on the alternative path method. The results indicated that the failure of gravity columns and joints more easily triggered the progressive collapse of the structure. After the failure of double moment-resisting frame columns, the structure still demonstrated considerable robustness. The impact of floor fragments played a controlling role in the process of collapse propagation. A method for achieving rapid collapse of structures was proposed based on the structural collapse characteristics. The study found that a demolition strategy based on gravity columns can facilitate the rapid collapse of structures. After comparing the different simplified modeling methods, it was revealed that the 2D models underestimated the anti-collapse performance of structures compared to the 3D models. Under the same scenarios, the predicted structural collapse response of the 2D model was several times greater than that of the 3D model (up to 7 times). Meanwhile, the structural collapse occurred earlier in the 2D model. The anti-collapse performance of structures adopting different design codes also was compared. It was revealed that GSA 2016 has put forward requirements for higher collapse resistance of buildings. In this study, a new calculation method was proposed, namely the Collapse Probability Prediction Method Based on the Randomness of Structural Load (CPPM-RSL). In the CPPM-RSL, load reliability theory was employed to ensure that the structural collapse resistance design fell within the realm of structural engineering theory. Meanwhile, the CPPM-RSL offered greater engineering interpretability compared to previous methods. Additionally, a new simplified mechanical model was proposed to predict the collapse resistance of structures. The new simplified model did not depend on the computational results obtained from the finite element method (FEM) unlike the existing model. At the same time, the simplified method also exhibited high reliability as revealed by comparisons with the FEM. To solve highly nonlinear problems, machine learning (ML) algorithms were established to predict the anti-collapse performance and the collapse probability of structures based on the proposed theoretical model. Meanwhile, the applicability and performance of the multiple ML algorithms in estimating the structural collapse behavior were compared and evaluated. The results indicated that the LightGBM model exhibited stronger robustness and predictive ability.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Macromodel-based simulation of progressive collapse: RC frame structures
    Bao, Yihai
    Kunnath, Sashi K.
    El-Tawil, Sherif
    Lew, H. S.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2008, 134 (07): : 1079 - 1091
  • [42] Comparison and Study of Different Progressive Collapse Simulation Techniques for RC Structures
    Menchell, Kfir
    Massart, Thierry J.
    Rammer, Yves
    Bouillard, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 135 (06) : 685 - 697
  • [43] Progressive collapse resistance-based strut configurations of beam string structure and its numerical verification
    Jiang Y.
    Zhou H.
    Kang W.
    Zheng J.
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2021, 42 : 186 - 194
  • [44] Progressive-collapse simulation of reinforced concrete frame structure subjected to earthquake
    Ge, Dongdong
    Zhou, Zhongfa
    Miao, Qisong
    Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47 : 50 - 55
  • [45] Numerical simulations on three-dimensional composite structural systems against progressive collapse
    Fu, Qiu Ni
    Tan, Kang Hai
    Zhou, Xu Hong
    Yang, Bo
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2017, 135 : 125 - 136
  • [46] Lagrangian approach to structural collapse simulation
    Sivaselvan, Mettupalayam V.
    Reinhorn, Andrei M.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2006, 132 (08): : 795 - 805
  • [47] Numerical simulation of the progressive collapse of polymer composite sandwich beams under static loading
    Mines, RAW
    Alias, A
    COMPOSITES PART A-APPLIED SCIENCE AND MANUFACTURING, 2002, 33 (01) : 11 - 26
  • [48] THE STUDY OF PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE IN DUAL SYSTEMS
    Alimohammadi, Hossein
    Dastjerdi, Keyvan Yashmi
    Yaghin, Mohammadali Loftollahi
    CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 16 (01) : 79 - 85
  • [49] Progressive collapse test of a space frame structure
    Zhao X.
    Yan S.
    Chen Y.
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2016, 37 (06): : 1 - 8
  • [50] PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE EVALUATION OF AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING - NUMERICAL APPROACH
    Lupoae, Marin
    Baciu, Catalin
    Murzea, Patricia
    21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE THE KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION, 2015, 21 : 831 - 837