Study on progressive collapse of overall structure based on numerical simulation method and prediction of structural collapse

被引:0
|
作者
Guo, Yuxu [1 ]
Yang, Bo [1 ]
Dai, Zheng [1 ]
Alqawzai, Shagea [1 ]
Chen, Kang [2 ]
Kong, Deyang [3 ]
Tang, Xiangyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Civil Engn, 83 Shapingba, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Jiaotong Liverpool Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 111 Renai Rd, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, E1A-02-16,1 Engn Dr 2, Singapore 117576, Singapore
来源
关键词
Steel frame structure; Progressive collapse; Numerical simulation; Collapse response; Simplified method;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111416
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study investigated the structural progressive collapse using finite element (FE) and theoretical methods. Firstly, an FE model was established based on the component method and layered shell element method. The reliability of modeling approaches was evaluated by comparing them with the previous experimental tests by the author. The NIST building was taken as an example to investigate the structural collapse behavior and the failure modes after different component failure scenarios including single column, double columns, multiple columns, and horizontal components based on the alternative path method. The results indicated that the failure of gravity columns and joints more easily triggered the progressive collapse of the structure. After the failure of double moment-resisting frame columns, the structure still demonstrated considerable robustness. The impact of floor fragments played a controlling role in the process of collapse propagation. A method for achieving rapid collapse of structures was proposed based on the structural collapse characteristics. The study found that a demolition strategy based on gravity columns can facilitate the rapid collapse of structures. After comparing the different simplified modeling methods, it was revealed that the 2D models underestimated the anti-collapse performance of structures compared to the 3D models. Under the same scenarios, the predicted structural collapse response of the 2D model was several times greater than that of the 3D model (up to 7 times). Meanwhile, the structural collapse occurred earlier in the 2D model. The anti-collapse performance of structures adopting different design codes also was compared. It was revealed that GSA 2016 has put forward requirements for higher collapse resistance of buildings. In this study, a new calculation method was proposed, namely the Collapse Probability Prediction Method Based on the Randomness of Structural Load (CPPM-RSL). In the CPPM-RSL, load reliability theory was employed to ensure that the structural collapse resistance design fell within the realm of structural engineering theory. Meanwhile, the CPPM-RSL offered greater engineering interpretability compared to previous methods. Additionally, a new simplified mechanical model was proposed to predict the collapse resistance of structures. The new simplified model did not depend on the computational results obtained from the finite element method (FEM) unlike the existing model. At the same time, the simplified method also exhibited high reliability as revealed by comparisons with the FEM. To solve highly nonlinear problems, machine learning (ML) algorithms were established to predict the anti-collapse performance and the collapse probability of structures based on the proposed theoretical model. Meanwhile, the applicability and performance of the multiple ML algorithms in estimating the structural collapse behavior were compared and evaluated. The results indicated that the LightGBM model exhibited stronger robustness and predictive ability.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Structural design methods to prevent progressive collapse
    College of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
    不详
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao, 2009, SUPPL. 1 (195-199): : 195 - 199
  • [32] The research on structural design to resist progressive collapse
    Guo, Zilong
    Cheng, Yuanbing
    Yin, Yixiang
    Qiao, Guanghua
    CIVIL ENGINEERING AND URBAN PLANNING III, 2014, : 517 - 521
  • [33] Structural collapse simulation under consideration of uncertainty -: Improvement of numerical efficiency
    Moeller, Bernd
    Liebscher, Martin
    Schweizerhof, Karl
    Mattern, Steffen
    Blankenhorn, Gunther
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2008, 86 (19-20) : 1875 - 1884
  • [34] Effects of Structural Bracing on the Progressive Collapse Occurrence
    Raminfar, Emad
    Izadi, Ardavan
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 23 (04): : 1 - 7
  • [35] PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE REVISITED - (THE PROBLEM OF STRUCTURAL FAILURE)
    AKROYD, TNW
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEER-PART A, 1981, 59 (12): : 387 - 391
  • [36] Experimental study and numerical analysis of progressive collapse resistance of composite frames
    Guo, Lanhui
    Gao, Shan
    Fu, Feng
    Wang, Yuyin
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2013, 89 : 236 - 251
  • [37] Numerical and experimental study on collapse of RC frame structure
    Hu, Kai
    Jiang, Li
    Qu, Ge
    Lu, Zheng
    Lu, Xilin
    Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures, 2014, 35 : 16 - 23
  • [38] Numerical Simulation uponExplosion and Collapse of Viaduct
    Ji, Shan
    Zhang, Guanghui
    Xie, Weiping
    Progress in Industrial and Civil Engineering III, Pt 1, 2014, 638-640 : 1085 - 1091
  • [39] NUMERICAL-SIMULATION OF LANGMUIR COLLAPSE
    ANISIMOV, SI
    BEREZOVSKY, MA
    ZAKHAROV, VE
    PETROV, IV
    RUBENCHIK, AM
    ZHURNAL EKSPERIMENTALNOI I TEORETICHESKOI FIZIKI, 1983, 84 (06): : 2046 - 2054
  • [40] Macromodel-based simulation of progressive collapse: Steel frame structures
    Khandelwal, Kapil
    El-Tawil, Sherif
    Kunnath, Sashi K.
    Lew, H. S.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2008, 134 (07): : 1070 - 1078