Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity

被引:9
|
作者
Goiato M.C. [1 ]
Shibayama R. [1 ]
Filho H.G. [1 ]
De Medeiros R.A. [1 ]
Pesqueira A.A. [1 ]
Dos Santos D.M. [1 ]
De Araújo C.A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracątuba Dental School, UNESP, Aracątuba, Saõ Paulo
[2] Department of Mechanical Projects, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais
来源
关键词
biomechanics; dental implant; Digital photoelasticity; image analysis;
D O I
10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Photoelastic analysis was used to evaluate the biomechanical behaviour of implant-supported, double-screwed crowns with different connection systems and cantilever lengths. Three models were made in PL-2 photoelastic resin and divided into six groups, on the basis of the implant connection system (external hexagon [EH] or Morse taper [MT]), type of abutment (Mini Pilar [Neodent, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil] or "UCLA") and number of crowns in the cantilever (one or two). The implant-prosthesis unit was placed in a circular polariscope. Occlusal surfaces of the crowns were subjected to 100-N loads in the axial and oblique (45°) directions in a universal testing machine (EMIC). Generated stresses were recorded and analysed qualitatively in a graphics program (Adobe Photoshop). Under axial loading, all of the groups had similar numbers of fringes, which were increased when the crowns were subjected to oblique loading. The highest number of fringes was found during oblique loading in the EH + Mini Pilar group. In conclusion, although the type of implant connection system did not have a direct influence on the stress distribution for axial loading, the cantilever length did have a direct influence on stress distribution. Models with two crowns in the cantilever showed more stress, with a greater concentration of force on the cervical part of the implant. © 2016 Taylor and Francis.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 42
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Determination of strain around distal implants as abutments for partial and fixed implant-supported prostheses with posterior cantilever
    Koodaryan, Roodabeh
    Yasamineh, Neda
    Hafezeqoran, Ali
    Moharrer, Sheida Monem
    Noorazar, Seyed Gholamreza
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLOGY & RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (02) : 100 - 105
  • [42] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of implant-supported fixed prostheses with cantilever extension in anterior mandible: A retrospective study
    Wang, Siyuan
    Chen, Xiaoyu
    Ling, Zhaoting
    Xie, Yiwen
    Chen, Cong
    Shen, Xiaoting
    He, Fuming
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (09) : 1180 - 1192
  • [43] Cordless digital workflow for scanning implant-supported prostheses at the abutment level: A dental technique
    Cho, Won-Tak
    Bae, Eun-Bin
    Ahn, Jong-Ju
    Huh, Jung-Bo
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (04): : 428 - 430
  • [44] In Vitro Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses
    D'haese, Rani
    Vrombaut, Tom
    Roeykens, Herman
    Vandeweghe, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [45] Effect of cantilever length and alloy framework on the stress distribution in peri-implant area of cantilevered implant-supported fixed partial dentures
    Suedam, Valdey
    Moretti Neto, Rafael Tobias
    Capello Sousa, Edson Antonio
    Rubo, Jose Henrique
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2016, 24 (02) : 114 - 120
  • [46] FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF STABILITY AND FUNCTIONAL STRESS WITH IMPLANT-SUPPORTED MAXILLARY OBTURATOR PROSTHESES
    de Sousa, Andrea Alves
    Camara Mattos, Beatriz Silva
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 112 (06): : 1578 - 1584
  • [47] Different Interventions for Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla with Implant-Supported Prostheses: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
    Messias, Ana
    Nicolau, Pedro
    Guerra, Fernando
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2021, 34 : S63 - +
  • [48] Survival and complications of implant-supported cantilever fixed dental prostheses with zirconia and metal frameworks: A retrospective cohort study
    Horsch, Laura
    Kronsteiner, Dorothea
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (05) : 621 - 629
  • [49] Influence of Cusp Inclination on Stress Distribution in Implant-Supported Prostheses. A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis
    Falcon-Antenucci, Rosse Mary
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    Perri de Carvalho, Paulo Sergio
    Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
    Noritomi, Pedro Yoshito
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2010, 19 (05): : 381 - 386
  • [50] Implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses in partially edentulous arches. A seven-year prospective study
    Romeo, E
    Lops, D
    Margutti, E
    Ghisolfi, M
    Chiapasco, M
    Vogel, G
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (03) : 303 - 311