Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity

被引:9
|
作者
Goiato M.C. [1 ]
Shibayama R. [1 ]
Filho H.G. [1 ]
De Medeiros R.A. [1 ]
Pesqueira A.A. [1 ]
Dos Santos D.M. [1 ]
De Araújo C.A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracątuba Dental School, UNESP, Aracątuba, Saõ Paulo
[2] Department of Mechanical Projects, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais
来源
关键词
biomechanics; dental implant; Digital photoelasticity; image analysis;
D O I
10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Photoelastic analysis was used to evaluate the biomechanical behaviour of implant-supported, double-screwed crowns with different connection systems and cantilever lengths. Three models were made in PL-2 photoelastic resin and divided into six groups, on the basis of the implant connection system (external hexagon [EH] or Morse taper [MT]), type of abutment (Mini Pilar [Neodent, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil] or "UCLA") and number of crowns in the cantilever (one or two). The implant-prosthesis unit was placed in a circular polariscope. Occlusal surfaces of the crowns were subjected to 100-N loads in the axial and oblique (45°) directions in a universal testing machine (EMIC). Generated stresses were recorded and analysed qualitatively in a graphics program (Adobe Photoshop). Under axial loading, all of the groups had similar numbers of fringes, which were increased when the crowns were subjected to oblique loading. The highest number of fringes was found during oblique loading in the EH + Mini Pilar group. In conclusion, although the type of implant connection system did not have a direct influence on the stress distribution for axial loading, the cantilever length did have a direct influence on stress distribution. Models with two crowns in the cantilever showed more stress, with a greater concentration of force on the cervical part of the implant. © 2016 Taylor and Francis.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 42
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative analysis of stress and deformation distribution in implant-supported telescopic systems made of different materials
    Bojovic, Milan
    Todic, Jelena
    Blagojevic, Milan
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2023, 80 (04) : 317 - 323
  • [22] Biomechanical Analysis of Implant-Supported Prostheses with Different Implant-Abutment Connections
    Dayrell, Andreza Costa
    Noritomi, Pedro Yoshito
    Ferreira Koyama Takahashi, Jessica Mie
    Xediek Consani, Rafael Leonardo
    Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz
    Fernandes dos Santos, Mateus Bertolini
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2015, 28 (06) : 621 - 623
  • [23] Accuracy of different digital acquisition methods in complete arch implant-supported prostheses: An in vitro study
    Pinto, Ricardo J.
    Casado, Sara A.
    Chmielewski, Krzysztof
    Carames, Joao M.
    Marques, Duarte S.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (01): : 172 - 177
  • [24] Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions: State of the art and future perspectives
    Roccuzzo, Andrea
    Fanti, Raffaele
    Mancini, Leonardo
    Imber, Jean-Claude
    Stahli, Alexandra
    Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro
    Schimmel, Martin
    Sculean, Anton
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2023, 16 (01) : 13 - 28
  • [25] CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF DIGITAL AND CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS FOR THE FABRICATION OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES
    Waleed, Al Qahtani
    Rami, M. Galal
    Ghada, E. Hamza
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL DENTISTRY, 2019, 23 (02) : 267 - 271
  • [26] The Impact of Implant Angulation on the Stress Distribution and Survival Rate of Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Study
    Chatterjee, Elashri
    Nasha, Amit
    Mustafa, Mohammed
    Chinthalapudi, Sai Lakshmi
    Padavala, Sushma
    Lakshmipuram, Achyuth Kumar
    Bhatnagar, Tarun K.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [27] Evaluation of Marginal Misfit of Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses Made Using Different Techniques
    de Luna Gomes, Jessica Marcela
    Dantas de Moraes, Sandra Lucia
    Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira
    Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido
    Grossi, Marcio Lima
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2019, 32 (04) : 345 - 348
  • [28] Stress on implant-supported fixed prostheses with different numbers of abutments after the application of acrylic resin
    Palmeiro, Marina Rechden Lobato
    de Barcellos, Leonardo Hoffmann
    Naconecy, Marcos
    Geremia, Tomas
    Cervieri, Andre
    Shinkai, Rosemary Sadami Arai
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 113 (04): : 323 - 328
  • [29] Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials
    Çiftçi, Y
    Canay, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2001, 14 (05) : 406 - 411
  • [30] Digital Workflow for Edentulous Patients with Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses: A Fully Digital Technique
    Jung, Seung Wook
    Fan, Yi-Qin
    Lee, Chunui
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2022, 10 (09)