Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: Digital photoelasticity

被引:9
|
作者
Goiato M.C. [1 ]
Shibayama R. [1 ]
Filho H.G. [1 ]
De Medeiros R.A. [1 ]
Pesqueira A.A. [1 ]
Dos Santos D.M. [1 ]
De Araújo C.A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Aracątuba Dental School, UNESP, Aracątuba, Saõ Paulo
[2] Department of Mechanical Projects, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais
来源
关键词
biomechanics; dental implant; Digital photoelasticity; image analysis;
D O I
10.3109/03091902.2015.1127440
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Photoelastic analysis was used to evaluate the biomechanical behaviour of implant-supported, double-screwed crowns with different connection systems and cantilever lengths. Three models were made in PL-2 photoelastic resin and divided into six groups, on the basis of the implant connection system (external hexagon [EH] or Morse taper [MT]), type of abutment (Mini Pilar [Neodent, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil] or "UCLA") and number of crowns in the cantilever (one or two). The implant-prosthesis unit was placed in a circular polariscope. Occlusal surfaces of the crowns were subjected to 100-N loads in the axial and oblique (45°) directions in a universal testing machine (EMIC). Generated stresses were recorded and analysed qualitatively in a graphics program (Adobe Photoshop). Under axial loading, all of the groups had similar numbers of fringes, which were increased when the crowns were subjected to oblique loading. The highest number of fringes was found during oblique loading in the EH + Mini Pilar group. In conclusion, although the type of implant connection system did not have a direct influence on the stress distribution for axial loading, the cantilever length did have a direct influence on stress distribution. Models with two crowns in the cantilever showed more stress, with a greater concentration of force on the cervical part of the implant. © 2016 Taylor and Francis.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 42
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SURVIVAL OF FIXED IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES RELATED TO CANTILEVER LENGTHS
    SHACKLETON, JL
    CARR, L
    SLABBERT, JCG
    BECKER, PJ
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1994, 71 (01): : 23 - 26
  • [2] Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Mandibular Complete Denture Using Different Cantilever Lengths and Occlusal Coating Materials
    de Medeiros, Rodrigo Antonio
    Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
    Pesqueira, Aldieris Alves
    Vechiato Filho, Aljomar Jose
    Bonatto, Liliane da Rocha
    dos Santos, Daniela Micheline
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2017, 26 (01) : 106 - 111
  • [3] EFFECT OF CANTILEVER LENGTH ON STRESS TRANSFER BY IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES
    WHITE, SN
    CAPUTO, AA
    ANDERKVIST, T
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1994, 71 (05): : 493 - 499
  • [4] Influence of the frameworks of implant-supported prostheses and implant connections on stress distribution
    Tonin, Bruna Santos Honorio
    Peixoto, Raniel Fernandes
    Fu, Jing
    de Mattos, Maria da Gloria Chiarello
    Macedo, Ana Paula
    DENTAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS, 2023, 60 (04) : 551 - 557
  • [5] Effect of cantilever length and framework alloy on the stress distribution of mandibular-cantilevered implant-supported prostheses
    Jacques, Leticia Borges
    Moura, Marcio Silva
    Suedam, Valdey
    Capello Souza, Edson Antonio
    Rubo, Jose Henrique
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (07) : 737 - 741
  • [6] Effect of different types of prosthetic platforms on stress-distribution in dental implant-supported prostheses
    Minatel, Lurian
    Verri, Fellippo Ramos
    Kudo, Guilherme Abu Halawa
    de Faria Almeida, Daniel Augusto
    de Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo
    Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2017, 71 : 35 - 42
  • [7] Retention Systems to Implant-Supported Craniofacial Prostheses
    Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
    Delben, Juliana Aparecida
    Monteiro, Douglas Roberto
    dos Santos, Daniela Micheline
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 20 (03) : 889 - 891
  • [8] Digital Impressions for Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses
    Lee S.J.
    Lee J.D.
    Current Oral Health Reports, 2017, 4 (2) : 136 - 141
  • [9] Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses
    Çaglar, A
    Aydin, C
    Özen, J
    Yilmaz, C
    Korkmaz, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2006, 21 (01) : 36 - 44
  • [10] THE INFLUENCE OF CANTILEVER LENGTH AND IMPLANT INCLINATION ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN MAXILLARY IMPLANT-SUPPORTED FIXED DENTURES
    Bevilacqua, Marco
    Tealdo, Tiziano
    Menini, Maria
    Pera, Francesco
    Mossolov, Alexei
    Drago, Carl
    Pera, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2011, 105 (01): : 5 - 13