A Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength between a Luting Composite Resin and Both Machinable and Printable Ceramic-Glass Polymer Materials

被引:0
|
作者
Aydin, Nazli [1 ,2 ]
Celik Oge, Selin [1 ]
Guney, Ogulcan [3 ]
Okbaz, Onur [3 ]
Sertdemir, Yasar [4 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-01250 Adana, Turkiye
[2] Cukurova Univ, Abdi Sutcu Vocat Sch Hlth Serv, TR-01790 Adana, Turkiye
[3] Cukurova Univ, Fac Dent, TR-01250 Adana, Turkiye
[4] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, TR-01790 Adana, Turkiye
关键词
three-dimensional printing; 3D printed permanent resin; printable permanent resin; ceramic glass polymer materials; shear bond strength; self-adhesive luting composite; CURE ADHESIVE CEMENT; SURFACE; AGENT;
D O I
10.3390/ma17194697
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study aims to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and Weibull characteristics between a luting composite resin and both printable and two different machinable ceramic-glass polymer materials. A total of 36 substrates were prepared, with 12 in each group. Printable substrates (12 mm x 12 mm x 2 mm) were printed by using permanent crown resin (3D-PR). Machinable substrates were obtained from Cerasmart 270 (CS) and Vita Enamic (VE) blocks (2 mm in thickness). The bonding surfaces of substrates were polished and airborne abraded (50 mu m Al2O3). A self-adhesive luting composite resin (RelyX U200, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA, SLC) was applied on substrates with the help of a cylindrical (& Oslash;3 x 3 mm) mold. The SBS test was conducted using a universal test machine. The SBSs of three materials were compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (alpha = 0.05). The Weibull modulus was calculated for each material. The Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests were carried out for the failure mode analysis. There was no significant difference between the SBSs of the three materials (p = 0.129). The Weibull modulus was 3.76 for the 3D-PR, 4.22 for the CS, and 6.52 for the VE group. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the failure modes of the groups (p = 0.986). Mixed-failure fractures were predominantly observed in all three groups. The results show that the SBS of the SLC to printable 3D-PR is comparable to that of CS and VE material. Failure modes of printable 3D-PR show similar results with two different machinable ceramic-glass polymers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Resin Bond to Indirect Composite and New Ceramic/Polymer Materials: A Review of the Literature
    Spitznagel, Frank A.
    Horvath, Sebastian D.
    Guess, Petra C.
    Blatz, Markus B.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 26 (06) : 382 - 393
  • [32] In vitro shear bond strength between fluorinated zirconia ceramic and resin cements
    Tanis, Merve Cakirbay
    Akay, Canan
    Akcaboy, Turgut Cihan
    Sen, Murat
    Kavakli, Pinar Akkas
    Sapmaz, Kadriye
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2018, 10 (03): : 205 - 210
  • [33] Shear Bond Strength of the Repair Composite Resin to Zirconia Ceramic by Different Surface Treatments
    Arami, Sakineh
    Tabatabaei, Masoumeh Hasani
    Namdar, Fatemeh
    Safavi, Nassimeh
    Chiniforush, Nasim
    JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 5 (04) : 171 - 175
  • [34] The Influence of Luting Systems on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Dentin to Indirect Resin-based Composite and Ceramic Restorations
    D'Arcangelo, C.
    De Angelis, F.
    D'Amario, M.
    Zazzeroni, S.
    Ciampoli, C.
    Caputi, S.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2009, 34 (03) : 328 - 336
  • [35] TENSILE BOND STRENGTH BETWEEN GLASS IONOMER CEMENT AND COMPOSITE RESIN
    HINOURA, K
    MOORE, BK
    SWARTZ, ML
    PHILLIPS, RW
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1986, 65 : 344 - 344
  • [36] Shear bond strength of composite resin to high performance polymer PEKK according to surface treatments and bonding materials
    Lee, Ki-Sun
    Shin, Myoung-Sik
    Lee, Jeong-Yol
    Ryu, Jae-Jun
    Shin, Sang-Wan
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2017, 9 (05): : 350 - 357
  • [37] Shear bond strength of polymer-glass composite to cast titanium.
    Kurtz, K
    Kabcenell, J
    Watanabe, I
    Okabe, T
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 272 - 272
  • [38] Comparison of shear test methods for evaluating the bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic
    Kim, Jae-Hoon
    Chae, Soyeon
    Lee, Yunhee
    Han, Geum-Jun
    Cho, Byeong-Hoon
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 72 (08) : 745 - 752
  • [39] Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth
    Terata, R
    Nakashima, K
    Kubota, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2000, 13 (04): : 209 - 211
  • [40] Effect of the difference water amounts and hydrolysis times of silane coupling agent on the shear bond strength between lithium disilicate glass ceramic and composite resin
    Osotprasit, Pimchanok
    Lauvahutanon, Sasipin
    Sirimethawong, Yosnarong
    Chaiamornsup, Patcharanun
    Jiangkongkho, Pornpot
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2024, 43 (03) : 375 - 385